BigRic

Prolly just busy with the move.

What's up? Not a lotta OF posts recently.

James Denver was hot.

Ryan has continued to update his OF and is now doing so more frequently than three months ago. It now contains stuff you're not likely to find anywhere else, including XXX content. Wow.

You can also DM him and let him know what you'd like to see--custom content. "No disappointments this time. I promise "

I thought this thread was at death's door,

I think you have me to thank for a bump two pages back after things had gotten "chill" for eight months.

"narrative"

FWIW I think a little push back is appropriate regarding the notion that it's "helpful" to state (read: allege) an absence of full service. I think these "newer guys" have to do their homework, especially given the, um, reams of intel that's available. That what he "doesn't offer" for one not necessarily being what he "doesn't offer" for another underscores that.

+1 on what Epigonos said about individual basis and vibes.

And nice but more than a little funny to see the remarkable change in attitude about Ryan by a particular member.

[Edited for clarity. 8/1/18, 7:13 pm PST]

Yeah, sure! In the same Parallel Universe Of Missed Points in which you really are in agreement with TOG.

I don't know if (m)any of us needed the mini-lecture on sexuality. More importantly, I think you might be missing a broader point (obscured perhaps by an erection) more important than even the question of how any of us would definitively know about the urges, prowess, performance and Friday night shenanigans of those 3 or most any other men.

I think many purportedly straight providers know there are those gay men who are so titillated by being with a "straight" man that they identify as such even if "bisexual" might be a more apt descriptor for some. "Show me the money."

LOL. You really think all those 3 are straight? "[A] whole nother story," indeed.

"pivot"

When used (as I understand was originally done by its Aussie originators) as a response to a request, "No worries" is okay (although overused). I'm finding, however, it is often said by someone in response to criticism of their problematic/annoying behavior. They don't get it.

"reaching out"

"spot on"

"pivot"

(Hopefully helpful) PM sent, JdR.

Oh you definitely have a "dog in this race." Why else would you be posting? Close, but no dick (other than you).

"Methinks she doth protest too much."

After reading this thread of comments, I came to the conclusion that I would never hire BigRic for his services.

Nice try, asshole. I've been on here for years, traveled all over the country and seen good and not so good dancers and escorts do Adonis in multiple cities for years. If you haven't found and hired me already from this board, there's arguably little likelihood that you would do so based upon thread comments. If you wanted to be a client, you would be already. So proudly trumpeting herein how disinterested you are means little to nothing other than "shade."

The site doesn't really work that way for client development IMO. What it DOES do is empower cunts like you to do exactly what you just did: Sassily say you wouldn't hire someone in a thread about someone you're already interested in.

Here's a much better example of "petty" behavior.

Fanboy.

Blah blah blah.

Blah blah blah. Although I think your heart is in the right place, the means via which to "reach out" for a private conversation with me are available now and were available nine months ago. That onus is on your shoulders not mine.

So typical of a variety of discussion fora. You've publically taken issue with my comments and are now inviting me to a private conversation? Bill Cosby voice: Riiiiight.

Oh and by the LOL way: You freakin' tagged me in your original post! If you potentially might not like what I have to say, don't freakin' ask for my input!

Thanks. But threads tend to have lives of their own. I think this proprietary OP attitude about subject matter nine months after starting a thread is . . . misguided.

Re ". . . on a thread I started asking for help in contacting this particular dancer." If you've had trouble finding not-hard-to-find Nicky after nine months (even given his break), I'd submit you have bigger issues. And the issue of why you're arguing with me publically if all you wanted was to talk to/meet Nicky privately remains.

But thanks for the unpacking comments/apology.

I found the "compliment" disingenuous and patronizing. If you don't know WTF I'm talking about, what's the basis for your disagreement? Why not inquire about what has (repeatedly) happened instead of behaving like a fanboy and basically saying my comments are, excuse me, inappropriate?

You've essentially said my comments are camp humor that shouldn't be taken seriously. How dancers treat customers and customers treat dancers should be taken seriously for the sake of all having a good time regardless of what happens away from the club.

That's wonderful that you strive to be respectful to all dancers. Not all customers do. If the critique doesn't apply to you, it's not clear why you're repeatedly engaging on the subject.

"Perhaps a tad" needless to say, SO not into your version of "awesome."

The precipitating behavior is petty. The critique is not.

No. Not sharing his Fb.

And my loc is not a secret, bro.