José Soplanucas

I am glad the local racists are having their party. So the people who did not get to know them in the P forum now they do.

Harry and Meghan? Your compass to look for victims is pointed in the right direction (for a blind Supremacist).

And what about recognizing the hard work invested by so many independent creators by paying the monthly fee? I pay with pleasure ten bucks for Rhyheim's OF.

I try to. I love when water boils.

+1 They charge extra for foreigners, but the difference is nothing for us. It is the most affordable way I know to feel generous. They are happy, and I feel well about myself.

You are advocating for a very healthy option but very selfish too. The fact that you can cope well with intolerance has nothing to do with the fact that we must cooperate in fighting to expand our rights. This conversation constantly switches to how thin the skin of the discriminated against minority is. However, this is actually about denouncing the mindset of the intolerant. Calling out the bigots is not playing the victim card. So, even if you can ignore the assholes, I hope you join the fight against assholness.

I agree, and that is what I mean by always making a judgment according to the circumstances. As I shared, I have asked these questions countless times and never offended anyone. But I see how the question can be constructed as offensive. For instance, if I were in Buenos Aires, I would never ask about their origin to certain workers out of the blue. Because of local racism, some nationals hide their origin to avoid unfair discrimination against them. In this conversation, I find it very telling that those who recognize a potential offensive nuance in this question and advocate for tact acknowledge that it is harmless in many contexts. Blind fundamentalism is on the other side.

So gracious of you!

So you agree on the existence of real victims who may find offensive this line of questioning in certain circumstances. And you agree that this is a legitimate concern and not another "Cult of Victimhood" construction. And you agree that we must be tactful when asking this question, considering the circumstances. Hopefully, you do not think that only Black American descendants of slaves deserve a gracious and exceptional pass. Hopefully, you think that even when, in your personal experience, only this group was "touchy" about it, there may be other groups that, in certain circumstances, could also be offended by this kind of questioning. If that is the case, we have never agreed more.

I quote you to preserve your eloquence from possible future editions. Booo, touchy people.

The issue is expanding our understanding of others' circumstances. If you live in the USA, White Supremacy and structural racism are a universal experience. If you feel like you are not experiencing it, perhaps you are on the "lucky" side of the equation. It is true some are going too far and are overreacting to potential and even imaginary nuances. We have work to do there. Often, the critics of "victimhood" are blind to recognizing when victims exist.

Similarly, micro-aggressions can be easily disguised as genuine curiosity. It is all about the circumstances.

Perhaps. "usually" moderates my statement.

@Unicorn, I hope to catch you before your first drink in your breakfast. I am implying that another right-winger fell victim to his hypocrisy.

It is about finding the right balance. It is good to be more aware and empathic of others' problems and concerns. We cannot pledge ignorance or lack of intent nowadays if we say insensitive things. But as you say, some do not cease to expand the field of their sensitivity.

I think you are underestimating the hard work of maintaining a high-quality OF.

You are having too many drinks. I am implying something that may violate the rules and that is not good for the moral integrity of some right-leaning actors.

As with everything else, it depends on the context. Usually, no one asks a White person for their ethnicity. Depending on the context, it may be constructed as discriminatory. I wonder if @Unicorn misunderstood what the lecturer was saying. Indeed, it is a question that requires tact, but as other posters shared, I have asked it countless times in friendly conversation with no issues.

OF gets "only" 40% of the fee. 60% is for the creator, whether or not he publishes anything.

Adios Gay Porn Studios - ILikePinga -welcome independent porn ILIKEPINGA.COM Adios Gay Porn Studios! Although they will continue to exist, the pandemic has taught us how little we do... INDEPENDENT PORN BOOM - ILikePinga -a 2020 tailored 4 masturbation ILIKEPINGA.COM INDEPENDENT PORN BOOM. This year, independent artists’ talent took over the pornosphera. Welcome to...

This seems like a sentence written two years ago. I sympathize with your feeling about the studios not knowing what good porn is, but they are not libraries anymore and are fully back into the business.

Your whole business cracks. That is why independent porn creators take the different sites' rules very seriously. Take a look at these summarizing tables: https://twitter.com/sophie_ladder/status/1545433694911229952 If you are into niche porn, you should have a very close look at it.

Please, let me know, and I may join you.

This thread should be an hommage to our gone friend @AdamSmith.