Venite

Now I also realize why RM hides written reviews in the US lol. Clients may not be careful with their words, and may openly describe the encounter as smex for m0n&y…….

Yup, exactly. It’s legal, so prices are visible, and providers coalesce around the common visible price point(s).

I suspect pricing might be similar in many places where smex for m0ney is legal because of learning on the part of suppliers (in this case, providers). The presence of publically advertised rates makes people adjust their prices to whatever optimal point generally exists. Unlike in the US, where providers can’t publish rates because that would often imply that the smex being advertised is in exchange for $$. Thus, providers in the US are more spread out in what they decide to charge, given no visible common price trend for them to follow. An absolute sidebar….. it’s been so peaceful in Daddy’s Den recently!

Brazilian_beefXL - Male Escort, Gay massage - Boston | Rent.Men RENT.MEN Brazilian_beefXL Gay Escort in Boston, Massachusetts, available for Gay Escorting,Modeling,Erotic Massage. | Find... This guy fits the bill.

It could be that his English is not great or he’s not confident in it.

Have seen him while he was in SF. Amazing 🍑

Agreed 🔥

Fiber in natural and man-compiled forms is a great dietary supplement

His dick might be 7 inches. Definitely doesn't look like 8.

11.5 inches was definitely doubtful.... too. I suspect he was trying to compliment his exceptional conventional attractiveness (he really is a hottie), with exceptional genitalia, to secure one or two hyperwealthy folks and not deal with the rest.

I indeed was looking for a scientific explanation for why his penis discontinuisly increases in girth after the base lol! I finally got it 🤣

I believe Adam Killian once had a rentmen profile. Anyone ever have the lucky chance of hiring him?

Looks like that rate dropped lol. I'm actually curious if anyone has seen him on here? I'm especially curious if he has topped anyone, given the picture of his hard (?) penis above.

I had to go in the middle of our meeting, but of course still compensated him. He was indeed a great kisser.

Discussed here Threads combined by moderators.

He may be taking notes on this thread at this very moment…..

My last reply here is just to highlight something fundamental here: there is simply uncertainty on both sides. Yes, you as a (presumably truthful) provider are worried (rightfully) that the client is going to make you travel /douche/ spend other money/ etc for nothing. A client on the other side (who happens to be truthful) is worried that you are NOT a truthful provider. Having been burned before, he says no to you. Either side, by acquiescing to the other, is taking a leap of faith. As Vin suggested, I would just put yourself in less of a position to force clients to make such a leap of faith. I suspect you are just here because of the harsh reality- that clients may indeed regularly decline you because you ask for a deposit, and you are frustrated about this standard. You may wish to seek out hyper wealthy clients then like @Cretus or something lol , who seem receptive to deposits. But the general game is simply going to be what it is. Inwish you a lot of success @TallMuscl37 Thanks @Daniel84 for your illuminating interaction on here- I learned something as a client myself.

Note that by “ I meant that relative to Company of Men(CON) users, a randomly chosen member of the entire RM population is going to be likelier to be flaky/duplicitous than them. This doesn’t equate to the statement “the average person is potentially a flake”. It is just saying that a randomly chosen member of the entire RM population is likelier to be a flake/scammer than a COM member. Yes, feel free to keep asking for deposits love.

.I meant population of providers *also* contains untrustworthy people, not clients. lol newbies should be able to edit

What I meant by average was “representative along certain dimensions”. I believe the “averages RM user, as @Cretus mentioned, is likelier to be flaky, or even themselves duplicitous (I have heard about constant scam calls too and freeloaders looking to trick you into a free sex phone talk). I simply wouldn’t fault us for not willing to send a deposit when the population of clients itself *also* contains some duplicitous, anti-social (the psychological definition ), and criminal individuals. We don’t know who we are interacting with. Maybe it’s frustrating to providers who *are* actually honest, but we can’t tell if you’re a deceitful person or not in the first interaction. combined with not wanting to leave paper trails, not wanting to have your money stolen by someone who you can’t verify is sufficient reason to not give deposits for most situations. The market will eventually decide, and you can feel free to keep asking for deposits, just as many of us will feel free to say no.

One good thing here is that this fraught conversation shows just how hated deposits are by even the “company of men” clients. Just imagine how terribly received they are by the average person on RM. Definitely see when they can be useful, and I certainly empathize with @Daniel84. It just seems like a line of work that you will have to deal with flakers and occasional wastage of travel and money IMO.

I'm a newbie. I don't have deletion privileges.

My first post yay. I’m based in SF and he happened to be around recently. I Had an Ok experience with him. A bit catty sometimes, unfortunately.