rvwnsd

As I said in one of the recent threads on RM reviews, when judging whether reviews look suspicious or not I use the following criteria: How long have the reviewers been members? If the reviewers are long- or medium-term RM members then I regard them as legitimate. How many reviews has the reviewer posted? How many different guys has the reviewer reviewed? How many reviews does the escort have and over what period of time? One tactic to gauge the legitimacy of a review/reviewer is to ask the reviewer for feedback. I've done that and have gotten everything from an essay to a one-word answer. The one-word answer guys usually warm up after some back-and-forth. If they don't reply or reply with very little detail, I question the legitimacy. (Not to them, of course) In this particular example, I would look at both the positive and negative reviews and apply the criteria above. If the majority of the positive reviews seem legit, I would chalk the one negative review up to a lack of chemistry, an escort who had an off day, an asshole client, or an asshole ex-friend/ex-boyfriend/fellow escort.

Given you and you the answer to Is "Yes, you have." That's no joke and no sarcasm.

One would think he would be, you know, hairy in his pics when his stats and ad say he is hairy. But, no, smooth as polished granite. Plus, you are right @Gymowner - he looks a LOT older than 27.

One would think he would be, you know, hairy in his pics when his stats and ad say he is hairy. But, no, smooth as polished granite. Plus, you are right @Gymowner - he looks a LOT older than 27.

What is this "watch" you speak of?

What is this "watch" you speak of?

No, he meant that no one believes them, as in the overwhelming majority of Forum members do not believe the reviews regardless whether they see the comments.

I submitted a positive review for a guy I hired from RM and it was rejected because (they said) there was no evidence of contact through RM. Never mind that we did, in fact, make contact through RM. I mentioned it to him and he told me not to sweat it because no one believes those reviews anyway.

No info other than JaseShep is a very recent (think today) arrival to Phoenix

Apparently, the funeral luncheon jokes will be salty and it will be a roast. Dry humor, most likely.

Right. Ballard and Fremont are names of two Seattle neighborhoods.

Coming soon: reviews from RainyRyan, MistyMike, FremontFred, and BallardBoyBilly.

Maybe it does tricks?

I thought the same thing.

Looks like France is looking to implement a national facial recognition program.

At the dawn of the internet a friend made up some raunchy name and proceeded to use it when he signed up for Facebook. He then tried to "friend" his friends, but no one would accept because it was so outrageous . Finally, after a work colleague explained exactly why he would not accept the friend request the guy closed the account and used his real name when creating a new one. BTW - the guy was in his late 40's at the time.

Are you trying to say that spoiled food introduced a rare, mind-altering bacteria into his system and the side-effect caused him to jump? OK, done making light of the guy's demise. It is tragic that someone decided to end his life. I'm sure more will be revealed as the story unfolds. On the other hand, if one has a terminal illness or is experiencing unbearable physical pain and wants to end it on their own terms, what better place than on a party boat? Go out while enjoying oneself.

Agree 100%. When "not clicking" occurs, I do not give a negative review. It doesn't feel fair to negatively rate a guy because there was no chemistry.

OMG - you totally had me there. Took a few minutes to realize that was a joke! Very good, very good. But seriously, restraint and consideration are two characteristics that many folks could stand to develop.

It's both, really. If memory serves correctly, someone resurrected a 15 year old thread recently. To me, starting a new thread on someone who has been inquired about in the distant past is fine, but three threads about the same guy in as many days is just too much. Not sure what this is all about (other than being annoying as hell) but I wish it would stop. PS: One of the multiple threads was innocently started by a long-time member who apologized for doing so. He didn't see the other thread. However, the others...

Proof that "...a once and a [sic] lifetime experience ..." is not always a good thing.

Wow - started advertising on January 20 and already received a bad review. That's gotta be a record. Or someone messing with him.

This is the first I've heard of that site. If I'm not the only one, that could explain the reason behind their demise.

I agree with everything you said and would like to add the following: If no experienced reviewer ever hired an escort whose reviewers were all first-time reviewers Then the escort would never have a review from a multiple reviewer And the cycle would continue Therefore someone has to hire and review the escort so that he has at least one review from a multiple reviewer Obviously, this is not a formal scientific/mathematical hypothesis (nor is the format correct) but it does make common sense, Or at least as much sense as the prevailing wisdom that one should be suspicious of an escort who has all first-time reviews.

The pictures look very familiar as does the ad copy. It seems like someone asked about a different ad that had these pics/this copy in the very recent past.