Jump to content

Crossing the line with Eye-Candy


Guest ReturnOfS
This topic is 7023 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Guest ReturnOfS
Posted
Posted

No legal line that I can think of, but I wish everyone of them would cross the street and come over to my place and we can talk about it.

As I understand the rules as they have been implented at this site, no aroused cock shots and no actual sex can be protrayed (at least for now) If I am wrong about this I hope someone higher up will clarify the picture (sorry for the pun ;( ) for us.

Posted

Actually, the current legal snafu revolves around record-keeping. As originally written, the law says this site would have to have legal proof of age on file for every "pornographic" image whether posted by Daddy or by you guys.

 

There isn't enough clerical help in the country to handle the record-keeping burden that represents.

 

However, the new "secondary producer" definition has been provisionally struck down and that's the part that drags this site into hot water. Unfortunately, absolutely nothing has been resolved completely and it's all still being argued by lawyers.

 

When you're done sending money to relief organizations for various natural disasters, send a few bucks to the Free Speech Coalition. They're making visible progress on this.

 

And no, none of these images would be a problem. :7

Posted

Most of them are relatively safe to the best of my understanding. It's all going to boil down to what is the legal defination of "lascivious exhibition of the genitals".

 

In the case of these photos, What I see is a model displaying some very nice examples of swim/under wear. Of course, there are many people across the USA that would disagree.

 

Daddy

Posted

>Given the new age of Big Brother regulating our free Internet

>porn, do you guys think that any of these pieces of eye-candy

>cross the legal line?

 

I'm not certain - I need more photos to determime if they've "cross the legal line"

Guest ReturnOfS
Posted

>Do those pictures remind anyone else of the style of old

>Asian porn?

 

What does old Asian porn look like anyway? Do you have any examples that you could post?

Posted

Nope, sorry. But I have seen a style they have, which of course has a name I can't remember, where the cock is draped. Maybe it had to be by law and they made an art of it, maybe not. However, it is the only kind I remember seeing come out in magazines from - and I can't remember whether it's Japan or China but I think it's Japan. Does anyone get the feeling that I can either keep noodling or one of you guys who has actually visited that part of the world could help us out with a bit of info here? Or maybe Deej? Or does his expertise only extend to American porn? Helppp....

Posted

I don't know nuthin' bout no Japanese porn.

 

Bur remember there was a time (not THAT long ago) where the closest you could get to "gay porn" in the US was bodybuilders in skimpy posing straps.

Posted

Ah, well, as Holmes said, once you eliminate all the other possibilities, you are left with the truth. Or some such thing. Notice I didn't put it in quotation marks. Thanks anyway, Deej.

I suppose our next recourse would be to start a thread in the Asian section. We don't seem to be getting any help from the Phuket men over here.

  • 5 months later...
Guest ReturnOfS
Posted

1000th Post Bump!! :-)

Guest ReturnOfS
Posted

1000th Post Bump!! :-)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...