Reviews: Information on Barebacking and HIV

[Guest HonkingGoose]

Reviews contain various data about escorts (age, weight, cock size, cut/uncut, phone number, email address etc.) some supplied by the escort, some by the reviewer, and some by both. Two important items are missing: Does the escort bareback? What is his HIV status? Both the escort and the reviewer could provide information about barebacking--the escort saying what he would do, and the reviewer saying what was done--no barebacking; barebacking bottom, barebacking top. Only the escort (I think) could report on HIV status--negative/unknown or positive.

 

I would certainly find this information useful. Others?

[bootdad]

HONKING GOOSE - WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU CHECKED IN WITH REALITY ???

[JT Brooklyn]

Bootdad..LOL Life is a "Crap Shoot"..Some of us, from time to time forget to remember it! Happy New Year! :+

[+ deej]

Content of the reviews are up to the reviewer. Daddy doesn't write them.

 

HIV status is protected under HIPPA so if this site attempted to become a repository of that information it would be on shaky legal ground, and the information is guaranteed to be outdated and useless almost immediately.

 

Some escorts choose to disclose their status in their advertising. Others will disclose during conversation. It is laudable that they share but that is their prerogative. It cannot be forced upon them.

 

The only safe assumptions when having sex is that your partner is positive and/or has previously been unsafe, so use protection at all times.

[CT Dick]

>The only safe assumptions when having sex is that your partner

>is positive and/or has previously been unsafe, so use

>protection at all times.

 

Deej is 100% right.

 

Would you really be unsafe with an escort who "said" he was negative? Would you hire one who said he was poz? I don't see many readers answering "yes" to either question.

 

Dick

[Boston Guy]

HG:

 

People lie about sex more than almost anything else. And, as others have noted, the information you seek can change in a heartbeat (almost literally).

 

I find the best approach for myself is to assume that all guys are HIV+ and willing to bareback and engage in all kinds of risky behaviors. Then I take appropriate precautions.

 

I used to ask guys what their HIV status was and volunteer my own (negative). I don't even bother doing that any more unless the other guy is someone I'm interested in dating more than once or twice. By not asking, I avoid putting the other person in the position of maybe wanting to lie to me or possibly feeling uncomfortable. And, no matter they might say in answer to my question, I would take exactly the same precautions. Even guys who insist they are negative and could show a test from two weeks ago could have gotten infected yesterday or the day before. So I just play it safe.

 

A safe 2006 to you.

BG

[willatwork37]

It's actually HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability.

[+ nycman]

>It's actually HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and

>Accountability.

 

...Act.

 

Hence, the double "A" in HIPAA