Who Is Dallas Observer?

[+ Lucky]

Don't you think that if you were going to question the integrity of the management here that you might start by being honest yourself? A few days ago, without a shred of evidence, Dallas Observer started a thread complaining that the pic of the day on the review site was selected by payola. He talks like he has been a poster here for awhile, and when questioned about it in another thread he stated:

 

"My oh my. This screen name is new but I am not. I've been a semi-regular poster undr a previous userid. When I returned from my 5 month trip to Japan I had blanked out on that name and signed up new under this one. Since then I do recall my previous name but no sense confusing people more.

 

-Dallas Observer"

 

SO really...if you took a five month break, why bother coming back at all to a site where you questioned the integrity of management? And just how do you "forget" your user ID if you were a "semi-regular" poster here? And what is so confusing about telling us what it was?

 

OR perhaps your new name is just created so you can stir the shit under a different cover?

[FourAces]

>>

>OR perhaps your new name is just created so you can stir the

>shit under a different cover?

>

>

 

I vote for this one. Oh wait I thought you were talking about you creating this post, nevermind.

[+ Lucky]

Quelle surprise! Four Aces was the first to respond. The same guy that "backed up" Dallas Observer's allegation with a six-month old post by a discredited escort. The same guy that left Hooville to form his own website about escorts because he was so unhappy with Daddy! The same guy that was tarred and feathered and run from his own website by the urchins he attracted to it! Now he's back here pretending like he never left! And living in Dallas now, of all places!

 

Quelle surprise!

[FourAces]

Lucky, Do these belong to you?

 

http://www.perfessorbill.com/covers/sgrapes.jpg

[+ Lucky]

I like these better:

 

http://www.londonstimes.us/toons/cartoons/Simeon_GrapesWrath_N_Love.jpg

 

 

Now answer the question!

[SAdler]

LOL. This feels like the first episode of Will and Grace this season....Ya know, the scene where Will says everything of importance or substance and then either Jack or Grace repeat EXACTLY what he's said and punctuate it with "There I've said it" and it becomes their thought.

 

In this case Lucky gets to play both Jack AND Grace and "there I've said it" is replaced by creating new threads

 

P.S. thanks "m4m-reality/DallasObserver". I've gotten 22 messages today saying that they were interested because of the multiple pictures you posted people only had the one before. Appreciate the publicity. Keep up the good work.

 

By the way, we now know that you're the same person as M4MReality since the tone of your writing and EXACT phrase choices are identical in your posts here and there. I would have posted this on your blog but I dont want to be a victim of your shameless information collecting on the site-meter

[Guest alanm]

Those 22 messages were surely the result of those great pictures, but his description of you as "soulless" probably helped also. Warning: Soulless may be the new sexy marketing term for escorts. That's a word I am more used to seing in a bad novel, usually by Ann Rice, than on an escort review site.

 

It is funny that his blog would backfire in such an unusual way.

[woodlawn]

>Quelle surprise! Four Aces was the first to respond. The same

>guy that "backed up" Dallas Observer's allegation with a

>six-month old post by a discredited escort.

 

Vincent Michael discredited? Since when? Can you fill us in on any occasions when anything he said on either board has been proved false? If not, why isn't he at least as credible as a character like you?

 

And what is the relevance of the fact that his post is several months old? He described his past experiences as an advertiser here. Does the fact that he posted this description several months ago mean it is somehow no longer an accurate description of what he experienced? Your posts often make little sense, but with this one you seem to have reached a new low.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The same guy that

>left Hooville to form his own website about escorts because he

>was so unhappy with Daddy! The same guy that was tarred and

>feathered and run from his own website by the urchins he

>attracted to it! Now he's back here pretending like he never

>left! And living in Dallas now, of all places!

>

>Quelle surprise!

[SAdler]

>Those 22 messages were surely the result of those great

>pictures, but his description of you as "soulless" probably

>helped also. Warning: Soulless may be the new sexy marketing

>term for escorts. That's a word I am more used to seing in a

>bad novel, usually by Ann Rice, than on an escort review site.

 

LOL. Well of course I attribute it to the pictures ... these blog vendettas are pure comedy. If anything it's amusing to see what these people do instead of having a normal life. Chcgo's vendetta Blog about BN has these hypothetical dialogues that literally roll me out of bed laughing.

 

But soulless is definitely the new black. Kinda goes hand in hand with future career goals in private criminal defense. Before Woodlawn (or anyone else goes) off on how that's the last thing I should be doing I'll remind him that I've only just gotten an undergraduate degree and he's getting worked up and arguing with someone who's pre-law and probably half his age at least. Kind of ironic that I'm at least in his ball-park to warrant his effort arguing.

 

>It is funny that his blog would backfire in such an unusual

>way.

 

Neal's ( http://earthtwo.blogspot.com/2005/12/it-appers-that-i-have-fan-at-hbmc-i.html ) was pretty helpful too. Some reference his by name and others just say blog so I can't differentiate but it was BETTER than getting coverboy last night (and I certainly didn't pay for that )

[Cooper]

As someone who actually reads all the posts on this MC, I always find Lucky's comments to be interesting, informative, witty, and right on target. No sour grapes found here.

 

Cooper

[FourAces]

>

>LOL. Well of course I attribute it to the pictures ... these

>blog vendettas are pure comedy. If anything it's amusing to

>see what these people do instead of having a normal life.

 

And your life is filled with some much promise yet have time to make countless posts each day and read each blog?

 

 

>But soulless is definitely the new black. \

 

No it isn't Souless is you spot on.

 

>Neal's (

>http://earthtwo.blogspot.com/2005/12/it-appers-that-i-have-fan-at-hbmc-i.html

>) was pretty helpful too. Some reference his by name and

>others just say blog so I can't differentiate but it was

>BETTER than getting coverboy last night (and I certainly

>didn't pay for that )

 

Let me understand you, you didn't pay for your spot on BoN's blog but accordinig to your own words you did pay for it when you were coverboy? I'm sure many will appreciate your confirmation of what Vincement Michael wrote on Escortspeak.com

[FourAces]

>As someone who actually reads all the posts on this MC, I

>always find Lucky's comments to be interesting, informative,

>witty, and right on target. No sour grapes found here.

>

>Cooper

 

It's nice to see you support your friends, your good friends on this board. Someone might as well continue to mislead the readers about various posters, right on.

[Cooper]

Sorry Four Aces, but I tell it like it is. It seems that anyone who doesn't agree with you is suddenly your enemy.

[+ Lucky]

Yes, it is nice to get some support from friends. At one point I even thought that 4Aces was my friend as well, but turns out he fooled me! At least he is only posting under one name today...I think!

[woodlawn]

> Kinda goes hand in

>hand with future career goals in private criminal defense.

 

You ought not to make disparaging remarks about criminal defense attorneys. You never know when you might need one.

 

>Before Woodlawn (or anyone else goes) off on how that's the

>last thing I should be doing I'll remind him that I've only

>just gotten an undergraduate degree and he's getting worked up

>and arguing with someone who's pre-law and probably half his

>age at least. Kind of ironic that I'm at least in his

>ball-park to warrant his effort arguing.

 

 

I agree that you are "at least" half my age. But you should stop using the word "ironic" until you learn what it means. Have our colleges stopped teaching their students English? That would explain a lot.

 

For the record, I'm not arguing with you when I post about your nonsensical distortions of various legal concepts. I am trying to prevent others who read this board from getting into trouble by assuming that your comments on the law have any connection to reality.

[Guest alanm]

>>Neal's http://earthtwo.blogspot.com/2005/12/it-appers-that-i-have-fan-at-hbmc-i.html

>>) was pretty helpful too. Some reference his by name and

>>others just say blog so I can't differentiate but it was

>>BETTER than getting coverboy last night (and I certainly

>>didn't pay for that )

>

>Let me understand you, you didn't pay for your spot on BoN's

>blog but accordinig to your own words you did pay for it when

>you were coverboy? I'm sure many will appreciate your

>confirmation of what Vincement Michael wrote on

>Escortspeak.com

 

Since Scott's posting was in response to something I wrote, let me respond. He was joking about paying to be coverboy. Joking!!!!!!

Nuance is sometimes lost in transferring spoken language to print, but not this time. Jeeeeez.

[joel304]

>For the record, I'm not arguing with you when I post about your nonsensical distortions of various legal concepts. I am trying to prevent others who read this board from getting into trouble by assuming that your comments on the law have any connection to reality.<

 

Woodlawn,

 

I love your writing style! You often make my day.

[SAdler]

>You ought not to make disparaging remarks about criminal

>defense attorneys. You never know when you might need one.

 

Woodlawn, I’d like you to meet my friend sarcasm ... Sarcasm, Woodlawn. Glad you two can meet. It appears Woodlawn is just now getting to know you given the content of his responses the past year or so.

 

Of course I’m not disparaging them – I’m making a joke based on public opinion considering I said myself that it’s a field I wanted to go into. Lighten up ... just a little innocence project. I know it’s difficult. Scheck-et Bevakasha.

 

>I agree that you are "at least" half my age. But you should

>stop using the word "ironic" until you learn what it means.

>Have our colleges stopped teaching their students English?

>That would explain a lot.

 

Well being I’m not an English major it’s not a major focus of mine in college. However I will say I had and always will have a grasp on it especially enjoyed when the concept thereof blows right over your head. The irony lies in the fact you’re discrediting me and making insults based on novice and youthful errors as if that’s a point to contest. I never claimed to have a couple generations of knowledge behind me but you still argue concepts (and often back down) with a mere “child” as it were.

 

>For the record, I'm not arguing with you when I post about

>your nonsensical distortions of various legal concepts. I am

>trying to prevent others who read this board from getting into

>trouble by assuming that your comments on the law have any

>connection to reality.

 

Then attempt to do so in a respectful manner without poignant insults and everyone will be happy. There, I’ve solved the problem. Or is there another excuse for the apparent bug up your ass? :7

[+ Lucky]

Scott says:

However I will say I had and always will have a grasp on it especially enjoyed when the concept thereof blows right over your head.

 

(Now that's irony!)

[SAdler]

[jackhammer91406]

Whiplash

 

You know, FA, I have followed your posts here for some time and also heard about some of what went on at the site you founded ( wasn't it originally called revolt or something? hmmm) when you became unhappy with how things were managed here and I gotta tell you, you have jumped back and forth so much and so fast I have whiplash from trying to decide what the hell you are talking about.

 

Between hyping blogs by who knows who, and backing up accusations about management here made by who knows who, and then taking whacks at posters here in the name of accuracy (is that what you want to call it) what is up with you man? And all of these bloggers that you are hyping, what evidence do you have that they know what the heck they are talking about? My favorite line in Arthur Miller's THE CRUCIBLE talks something about telling a lie and swearing to it as the easiest means to defame someone.

 

For anyone to say they were close with Hooboy does not grant instant credibility to anyone. They can all state their opinion, but it doesn't make it fact. As for the escort who stated he felt he had a quid pro quo agreement with Hooboy for placement as cover boy, let me ask the legal eagles; Without written proof, doesn't this amount to little more than hearsay? After all, the kid just said he always felt that he got that treatment, he never said anything was expressly said or agreed to.

 

I know it has been sport here for some time to speculate on how many id's people have and who once posted as who. What the hell man? All these petty bitch slap fests by new or resurrected id's give me a headache.

 

I'm with Cooper on this one.

 

And by the way Cooper, I just noticed your new avatar and it's great.

[woodlawn]

>>You ought not to make disparaging remarks about criminal

>>defense attorneys. You never know when you might need one.

>

>Woodlawn, I’d like you to meet my friend sarcasm

 

Based on the difficulty you have expressing sarcasm, I'd have to say you don't know it well enough to introduce anyone else to it.

 

 

>Of course I’m not disparaging them

 

A career criminal really can't afford to do so.

 

 

>Well being I’m not an English major it’s not a major focus of

>mine in college.

 

I think we all realized that quite some time ago.

 

 

> The irony lies in the fact you’re

>discrediting me and making insults based on novice and

>youthful errors as if that’s a point to contest.

 

Again, you need to consult your dictionary about the meaning of the word "irony."

 

> I never

>claimed to have a couple generations of knowledge behind me

>but you still argue concepts (and often back down) with a mere

>“child” as it were.

 

I'd love to see you post some examples of discussions in which I have "backed down." Well?

 

 

>>For the record, I'm not arguing with you when I post about

>>your nonsensical distortions of various legal concepts.

 

 

>Then attempt to do so in a respectful manner without poignant

>insults and everyone will be happy. There, I’ve solved the

>problem. Or is there another excuse for the apparent bug up

>your ass?

 

 

Scott, someone who engages in personal attacks on other posters as often as you do really can't get away with lecturing the rest of us about treating people with respect. If you don't see the blatant hypocrisy in your behavior here, it isn't only your education that is lacking, it's your eyesight.

[LoneStar]

Why is it so important to you? Are you writing a book? Are you making a list? Are you planning on sending him some money? Are you going to hire him?

 

Why the obsession?

 

After all just who is Lucky? Who is this guy that has so much time on his hands he has made 6000 posts? What importance does Lucky play in this revolving forum?

[LoneStar]

>Yes, it is nice to get some support from friends. At one

>point I even thought that 4Aces was my friend as well, but

>turns out he fooled me! At least he is only posting under one

>name today...I think!

 

Sounds like a case of monkey see monkey do, is it time for your next show? I want to watch.

[+ Lucky]

We now know who Dallas Observer is: the loneliest man in Texas. Get some help dude. All of these screen names you use, your blogs, your rants over on escort speak, your threat to call Scott Adler's parents...your threat that I am going to have a very unlucky year...your continuing attempt to smear the management here...yes, get some help! Get Four Aces, Dallas Observer, Lone Star, Ben Adler, and all of your other personalities in one room with a good shrink. Good luck.