I OBJECT

[Becket]

Too much information would be considered a review.

 

~Boomer ~

 

 

Things have changed around these parts regarding reviews. I continue to be confused as to the administrators intentions with this site. I understand....it's not my sandbox and it's all free. Still I remain confused and a bit frustrated.

[jawjateck]

Disabled PM feature years ago. No regrets at all about that decision.

[+ José Soplanucas]

Disabled PM feature years ago. No regrets at all about that decision.

 

I noticed. I am starting a blog and tried to reach out to you to ask for your advise and experiences, but I was not able to.

[jawjateck]

I noticed. I am starting a blog and tried to reach out to you to ask for your advise and experiences, but I was not able to.

 

Sorry friend. For most guys, it would not be a problem, but this site has a history with a few insurgents who are nastier in private than they are in public.

[Beancounter]

I used to provide info via the PM system here on the Forum but of late I'm hesitant to do so. It dawned on me that I don't know anyone on this board personally and I wasn't sure where the information would end up or how it would be used.

 

One Forum member continued to pump me for information after I had already provided what I knew. It made me pause and ask myself who this individual really was. And the implied suggestion that I was holding back or lying did not set well with me.

 

My personal philosophy that I now follow is "Buyer beware". I, and I alone, am responsible for the choices I make.

[MikeyGMin]

One Forum member continued to pump me for information after I had already provided what I knew. It made me pause and ask myself who this individual really was.

I'm trying to remember whether we've ever had any PM conversations.

 

The same thing happened to me. I was happy to make the recommendation and verify the pictures were accurate and it was a very good BFE, but the follow-up message ask very detailed and graphic questions. I didn't respond because:

1. I don't really know who you are.
   
2. Your experience may vary. Just because we did certain things doesn't mean they are always on the table.
   
3. I'm not going to make conjectures about what they might be willing to do.
   

However, most of the inquiries are of the basic nature and don't make me feel uncomfortable. Also they stem from some positive comment I've made, which I would not have done if I didn't think the escort wasn't worthy of additional business.

[KennF]

There is a huge difference between simply verifying that the escort is legit, the photos are accurate, and he delivers on what he advertises; and going into a blow-by-blow (pun intended) account of the session.

 

People can do whatever they want here that doesn't violate the rules, but I have to admit that I find it annoying also. It's better than when people post "I sent you a PM." That one makes me crazy. Just send the damn PM, they will get it, the rest of us don't need to know about it.

 

Not sure I agree with you fully here.

 

If someone posts that they PM'd someone, then, as has been mentioned, others MAY ask for that information privately. If the 411 request goes uncommented, then you don't know.

 

Just my opinion.

[MikeyGMin]

Not sure I agree with you fully here.

 

If someone posts that they PM'd someone, then, as has been mentioned, others MAY ask for that information privately. If the 411 request goes uncommented, then you don't know.

 

Just my opinion.

Good point.

[+ bashful]

Frankly I want to know what he is willing and what he is not willing to do and how well he performs.

 

Based on my experience, what happened between an escort and the reviewer may not happen between you and an escort.

[+ José Soplanucas]

Not sure I agree with you fully here.

 

If someone posts that they PM'd someone, then, as has been mentioned, others MAY ask for that information privately. If the 411 request goes uncommented, then you don't know.

 

Just my opinion.

Good point. I did not think of that.