Vegas fake

[oldhat]

It had to happen eventually. I allowed fake pictures to override my caution.

 

The rogue in question is:https://rent.men/Mr_Pleasure (812-675-5074)

 

He also had a BP ad up: http://nevada.backpage.com/MenSeekMen/arabic-american-upscale-model-escort-massage-and-release-alan/25721489

 

We look forward to your review: https://www.daddysreviews.com/submit

[dcbbvers]

thanks for the heads up -- Im heading to Vegas in a month and those pics are smoking hot. what a shame.

[dcguy20]

I wonder who the guy in the photos is?! Very hot.

[+ nycman]

Headed to Vegas next week.

 

Thanks for the warning!

[coriolis888]

I wonder who the guy in the photos is?! Very hot.

 

 

Good question; who is he?

 

Even using some of the most sophisticated image search programs (Google is not very good), the photos in his ad are not found. Considering that the escort did not match the photos, it is possible that the person who has the bogus ad got a "clean" set of photos from someone whose photos are not on the internet. I cannot think of any other reason image search software cannot locate the origin of the photos.

 

There is another red flag in the escort ad. He boasts about being a "Mixed Brazilian" but in his profile under languages spoken he says he speaks English and Spanish. Spanish is not the language of Brazil - In Brazil, Portuguese is spoken.

 

Too bad you went through the hassle but at least that con man did not get your money.

 

-

[Becket]

Vegas fake is being redundant.

[curiousheartguy]

Vegas fake is being redundant.

Here! Here!

The rentboy scene in Vegas is full of fakes and flakes.

Don't know why, I guess the boys assume that the town is full of drunk, stupid people that are ready to just throw money away

[Guy Fawkes]

I'm getting tired of having to cleanup negative reviews in the message forum.. I'm going to start giving out time-outs to people that write them and the people that encourage them.

I encourage all of you to read the "Terms and Rules" in the lower-right hand corner of every page.

[hwic04]

The original post may have violated the terms and conditions, so I have no argument deleting it, as I'm sure it said a lot more than "he's fake." But can we at least know which is the fake ad?

[+ azdr0710]

But can we at least know which is the fake ad?

 

Looks like a moderator restored the info in the first post