411 on ScottB from DC--now traveling

[Despardo]

https://rent.men/ScottB

 

Any first hand experiences?

[Strafe13]

I just asked about him (among others) in my 411 thread about guys in or visiting New York City.

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/411-on-these-10-nyc-hunks.114934/

[MidwestCoastal]

Bump... any recents? I have a trip to Florida soon and love huge cock!

[+ azdr0710]

Ahh, the old tape measure trick....

[MidwestCoastal]

Well... let's hope we can get verification of the measurement!

[Strafe13]

I saw him in February while we were both passing through Los Angeles. He was a nice enough guy, and he was polite but we cut the session short due to a lack of chemistry. I found him to be honorable though, since he offered to not charge anything; I insisted that he keep half the hourly fee. Feel free to inquire through a private conversation for more details.

[marylander1940]

I saw him in February while we were both passing through Los Angeles. He was a nice enough guy, and he was polite but we cut the session short due to a lack of chemistry. I found him to be honorable though, since he offered to not charge anything; I insisted that he keep half the hourly fee. Feel free to inquire through a private conversation for more details.

 

I think he did that as a gesture of goodwill for you not to give him a negative review or say anything negative about him on here...

 

If 93 guys gave him 5 stars maybe your expectations were too high.

[Strafe13]

I think he did that as a gesture of goodwill for you not to give him a negative review or say anything negative about him on here...

 

If 93 guys gave him 5 stars maybe your expectations were too high.

 

Of course it was a gesture of goodwill. He probably did it for the same reason that a restaurant will comp your meal if you barely touched it.

 

I don't know if you offered the second part of your opinion in a sincere manner, or to be snarky. But I've been in this game long enough to know that i didn't enter the session with Scott any unrealistically high expectations. Appointments sometimes just don't work out, and I'm not going to go into further detail on a public thread because I don't want anyone to misconstrue my words as a negative review or commentary on the guy. I've no hard feelings against him whatsoever.

[marylander1940]

Of course it was a gesture of goodwill. He probably did it for the same reason that a restaurant will comp your meal if you barely touched it.

 

I don't know if you offered the second part of your opinion in a sincere manner, or to be snarky. But I've been in this game long enough to know that i didn't enter the session with Scott any unrealistically high expectations. Appointments sometimes just don't work out, and I'm not going to go into further detail on a public thread because I don't want anyone to misconstrue my words as a negative review or commentary on the guy. I've no hard feelings against him whatsoever.

 

Your post sounded negative, thank you for making it clear.

[Strafe13]

Your post sounded negative, thank you for making it clear.

 

Please don't speak down to me. I didn't provide any specific information in my post from which one could reasonably infer that I approached the session with expectations that were too high. You came up with that all on your own. I didn't describe any scenes that I wanted to engage in, nor did I say that Scott failed to follow through with any agreed upon activity. In fact, I said nothing at all about what I expected, but instead offered to share details via private conversations. It looks like you read more into my post than was intended (or was even there), and then reflexively defended the escort from what you erroneously perceived to be a slight, by patronizing me as having had high expectations. That was insulting and uncalled for.

 

I did my best to be fair and kind to this escort, while also giving information to the OP that I thought would be helpful. My post wasn't glowing because I obviously didn't have an amazing experience, but that doesn't mean that I said anything negative about Scott either. I said that he was a "nice enough guy," whom I found to be both "polite" and "honorable." I also phrased my post to make it clear that we left on amicable terms, and that I didn't blame him for the less than stellar experience ("we cut the session short due to a lack of chemistry" and "I insisted that he keep half the hourly fee"). If the language I pointed out above is negative then I'd shudder to see really negative comments.

 

I think it's important that when a poster makes a 411 inquiry, he/she receive information from multiple perspectives, and not just the overly positive ones, or a hijacked thread about how someone who's never even met the escort doesn't like his tattoos or hairstyle. The main point of my post was to show that this escort was still professional even when a session didn't go very well. That Scott declined to charge me, impressed upon me that he doesn't see clients as just walking ATMs, but appreciates them as real people. I hope that the other posters who sought info on Scott came away with that as well.

 

I'll add that I also found Scott to be adorable and a sweet guy, and I wouldn't necessarily rule out trying him again. To that point, we'd even discussed my potentially hiring both him and his boyfriend (also a pro) for a 3-way at some future date. (I couldn't see him again on that trip because I was flying out the next morning, but I often visit his home base area.) I've no idea if they're still together, but I'm open to following through.

[marylander1940]

Please don't speak down to me. I didn't provide any specific information in my post from which one could reasonably infer that I approached the session with expectations that were too high. You came up with that all on your own. I didn't describe any scenes that I wanted to engage in, nor did I say that Scott failed to follow through with any agreed upon activity. In fact, I said nothing at all about what I expected, but instead offered to share details via private conversations. It looks like you read more into my post than was intended (or was even there), and then reflexively defended the escort from what you erroneously perceived to be a slight, by patronizing me as having had high expectations. That was insulting and uncalled for.

 

I did my best to be fair and kind to this escort, while also giving information to the OP that I thought would be helpful. My post wasn't glowing because I obviously didn't have an amazing experience, but that doesn't mean that I said anything negative about Scott either. I said that he was a "nice enough guy," whom I found to be both "polite" and "honorable." I also phrased my post to make it clear that we left on amicable terms, and that I didn't blame him for the less than stellar experience ("we cut the session short due to a lack of chemistry" and "I insisted that he keep half the hourly fee"). If the language I pointed out above is negative then I'd shudder to see really negative comments.

 

I think it's important that when a poster makes a 411 inquiry, he/she receive information from multiple perspectives, and not just the overly positive ones, or a hijacked thread about how someone who's never even met the escort doesn't like his tattoos or hairstyle. The main point of my post was to show that this escort was still professional even when a session didn't go very well. That Scott declined to charge me, impressed upon me that he doesn't see clients as just walking ATMs, but appreciates them as real people. I hope that the other posters who sought info on Scott came away with that as well.

 

I'll add that I also found Scott to be adorable and a sweet guy, and I wouldn't necessarily rule out trying him again. To that point, we'd even discussed my potentially hiring both him and his boyfriend (also a pro) for a 3-way at some future date. (I couldn't see him again on that trip because I was flying out the next morning, but I often visit his home base area.) I've no idea if they're still together, but I'm open to following through.

 

The main reason of your post now is clear, I thought things went wrong as in no chemistry or something like that

Edited June 18, 2019 by marylander1940