Jump to content

This is Unbelievable


quoththeraven
This topic is 3503 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted
Imma go out on a limb and say some of you who are going to grasp your pearls and say this was such a tragedy also feel that guns are bad and only pigs should have guns.

 

Hugs,

Greg

I am a bit confused by your logic. These two people wound up dead, presumably that occurred partly because they had a gun. So how did gun ownership help?

Posted
I am a bit confused by your logic. These two people wound up dead, presumably that occurred partly because they had a gun. So how did gun ownership help?

 

Reread the aeticle. But this time after a couple cups of coffee. Also note what QTR posted.

 

Hugs,

Greg

Posted
Reread the aeticle. But this time after a couple cups of coffee. Also note what QTR posted.

 

Hugs,

Greg

I did read the article and several others because I did not know the source of the article. I am not trying to justify the police shooting. I am questioning your logic in thinking a gun helps. Now I will have a coffee. I think you need something to wake you up the real cost of gun ownership.

Posted

The original poster's headline said "unbelievable." Yes, I agree, this article is unbelievable.

 

To me, the source of this article is questionable. It links to a couple of mainstream news sources (including the LA Times and NBC Los Angeles) which report the same basic facts, but don't lead the reader to the same conclusions about the incident. While the officials seem to indicate that the victims were "unconscious" when the police arrived this article describes them as "asleep." I believe that these two terms lead the reader to very different conclusions about what was going on. The author at thefreethoughtproject.com implies that the officers arrived at the scene, found the victims "asleep" and shot them to wake them up. The other articles don't speculate about what transpired between the officers' arrival and the shooting; they seem more factual.

 

If the facts supported it, another story about police malpractice would surely be getting broad attention in a wide array of media outlets, but as far as I know, this story doesn't have "legs." I'm not trying to deny that our nation has serious problems with racially charged police brutality, but I think this article is speculation disguised as journalism. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

Posted
This stuff just has to stop.I used to say that not all cops were"pigs"as friends referred to them.I am not so sure anymore.

 

You have friends who call cops "pigs?" And that doesn't concern you? Yikes.

 

I suspect that this isn't story from "free thought project" -- which is right up there with Alex Jones and Media Matters for credibility -- isn't the whole story.

Posted
Imma go out on a limb and say some of you who are going to grasp your pearls and say this was such a tragedy also feel that guns are bad and only pigs should have guns.

 

Hugs,

Greg

 

It wouldn't work here, but there are plenty of countries where the police by and large don't have guns. The UK is one of them. I believe Japan is another.

 

The police rely too much on weaponry (including supposedly non-lethal weaponry) and not enough on calming the situation down.

 

I am a critic of US gun culture and would be happier if only hunting weapons were legal, but I see police brutality and misconduct as another aspect of gun culture.

Posted
I am a bit confused by your logic. These two people wound up dead, presumably that occurred partly because they had a gun. So how did gun ownership help?

 

As I read it, the assertion they had a gun was either a lie or an excuse. If they had such a easily-reached gun, how is it the police didn't see it or remove during the 45 minutes before the shooting?

 

This sounds more like a massacre. Keep in mind police once beat up an unarmed man who only knew Hindi, not English, because he didn't understand their instructions to get on the ground, and his lack of compliance infuriated them.

Posted
Imma go out on a limb and say some of you who are going to grasp your pearls and say this was such a tragedy also feel that guns are bad and only pigs should have guns.

 

Hugs,

Greg

 

Guns are bad, and except in rare cases there is no reason to own one. None.

 

("Pigs," whatever that's supposed to mean, are irrelevant.)

Posted
This (calling cops pigs)was years ago.It was something I argued against.Its getting harder to do these days.

 

The 1970s called. They want their insults back.

Posted
Guns are bad, and except in rare cases there is no reason to own one. None.

 

("Pigs," whatever that's supposed to mean, are irrelevant.)

 

Did the use of the word 'pigs' for policemen gain national attention at the Democratic Party convention in 1968 in Chicago, with Mayor Daley shouting insults on the floor of the convention at Sen. Ribicoff? I believe the senator had called out the Chicago police for the treatment of the anti-Vietnam war protesters.

 

Pres. Johnson (at his ranch in Texas) worked behind the scenes to secure the nomination for Vice President Humphrey. I am not excusing the use of the word, "pigs." But, earlier in 1968, MLK and Sen Robert Kennedy were assassination, LBJ did not seek reelection and there were over 500,000 American military in Vietnam. And a few months later voters elected Nixon.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...