Jump to content

Baby Puts Martha in Her Jail


Lucky
This topic is 7682 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Guest ReturnOfS
Posted

OK, so when will he pose nude for Playguy? :p

Posted

Agreed. I'd bet the farm that he's a bottom-boy through & through~

 

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. I was a bit surprised to see him get off with only a slap on the wrist and a little financial loss. He was such a sniveling little turd throughout the trial and really seemed to milk his 15 minutes of fame for all it was worth. Anytime he spoke to the media, he simply came off as some overt homosexual who felt 'heroric' for tattling on Martha Stewart.

 

Honestly, if he felt he was going to permanently bring her down, he was delusional. Stewart has built a HUGE empire, all by herself. While she's away vacationing at Club Fed, i'm sure she'll make plans to be back on top after everything's said and done. IMO, she was a governmental scapegoat, plain & simple. As she said at her press conference after the sentencing... She will be back.

 

I'm sure we'll soon be seeing Baby on some gay-themed, MTV-based reality wash-up show. In any case, it never pays to be remembered as the snitch and methinks this kid has possibly made himself tough to employ in the future. Maybe the prediction of him coming into escorting isn't that far off base.

 

... Just don't trust him with any personal info ;)

 

 

Warmest Always,

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas

Guest rohale
Posted

>Yes.

>I`m willing to do a first review !!:-) :-)

>Bet he`s a bottom. ??

 

 

I'd get in line for a second review:-)

Top or bottom, as long as the guy wants to be pumped or pump someone, no complaints from my end.

 

Rohale

Guest zipperzone
Posted

>He was such a sniveling little

>turd throughout the trial and really seemed to milk his 15

>minutes of fame for all it was worth. Anytime he spoke to the

>media, he simply came off as some overt homosexual who felt

>'heroric' for tattling on Martha Stewart.

 

Hold on a second here! What would you have advised him to do?

He was under oath, don't forget. Should he have lied on the stand so he could be charged with pergury?

Posted

>I'd get in line for a second review:-)

>Top or bottom, as long as the guy wants to be pumped or pump

>someone, no complaints from my end.

 

Bet yah, he enjoys three ways :9 getting from both ends }(

Posted

No. He shouldn't have lied~

 

I simply didn't like his personality throughout the trial and thought it was a case of meglomania gone overboard. He probably would have admitted that he and Martha 'got it on' in the event that CNN would have given him another 5 minutes of TV time.

 

Honestly, this whole trial was really nothing more than a longer version of any reality show you can find on Fox. It formed some great 'characters' and twisted the plot enough to keep America's attention. Next up: The Michael Jackson Case. In the event of a delay, i'd settle for Robert Blake and his schmaltz.

 

Cynical... Me? Perhaps, but only when it comes to these sorts of unsavory people. I just didn't get a good vibe from Baby throughout this whole Martha circus. Whether he's a great fuck is a totally different issue, so if anyone's got the goods on that one, feel free to share with the group :)

 

 

Warmest Always,

 

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas

Posted

My feeling is that he loathed Martha and was out to get her.

 

A smart move on his part would have been to take the Fifth at the initial interview. Since the Feds prefer to go after a big fish like Martha rather than somebody unknown, it's likely they would have offered him immunity in exchange for his testimony against Martha, and he'd be off the hook.

 

Well, $2000 is a weekend's work for a good escort/companion, but I'm not sure he could command that much to start with.

Guest rohale
Posted

When Martha Stewart first became famous through her syndicated morning show on gardening. The general television audience mainly compromised of soccer moms really enjoyed what they saw. The Nielsen Ratings showed. The problem is everytime someone becomes successful and especially women, there is a portion of the public that becomes resentful. With Martha Stewart, her troubles began when her brother started talking to news maker magazines like Dateline and Prime Time Live and talked about her violent temper. He then spoke to the tabloid press. Then matters snow balled out of control. The tablod press started poking their noses into her financial dealings. Remember while this was taking place, there was another scandal being exposed, we call it Enron. Now the federal government wanted to show the public that they will not tolerate corporate pirating. Who do they target first none other than Martha Stewart herself. To justify the governments position, they accused her of insider trading. In her case she got caught red handed about tip offs on the Stock Exchange. The problem is insider trading happens all the time but they targeted her because a large segment of the public were starting to wane of her presence because all we ever heard was her financial success. The genius of the matter is it worked. We all know about the trial. Her partners got off virtually scott free, whilst she will spend six months in jail. I wonder what the federal government will do when gets out next year. Probably go after her again, and make a sport out of it for their amusement. Ah to be successful in this time and graceless age.

 

Rohale

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...