Harry Potter

[Guest skrubber]

If it weren't for that whole age thing, I'd do him.

[NASAguy]

The older he gets, the sexier he becomes that's for sure.

[guptasa1]

I've always had a thing for guys who look like Harry as well (of age obviously).

[Funseeker 22]

Must be those glasses ?

[trilingual]

Daniel Radcliffe is growing up to be a beautiful young man.

 

Prisoner of Azkaban is by far the best of the three films, so far. Darker, much more action-packed, and the characters are much more captivating and realistic than in the first two films. It really was quite brilliant!

[Guest icon513]

The director is the same guy who did "Y Tu Mama Tambien" -- one of the sexiest films of the past couple years...perhaps he's brought some of that edgy sexiness to Harry Potter (I haven't seen it yet, but will).

[VaHawk]

LMFAO! I'm glad to see that the "age thing" is stopping you and others from pursuing an actor, that you all, in all likelihood, aren't going to meet!

 

Glad, also, to see that the "age thing", isn't prevalent on this site. It is so truly refreshing to come to a gay site where the drool factor for under aged teens/guys who look like underaged teens, is less than 5 on a scale of 1 to 10. :o

[Guest rohale]

I totally agree that Daniel Radcliffe gets better with age. If he carries on acting and choses some intelligent roles, he has the potetential to be a Cary Grant or Hugh Grant of his generation. He also has a reputation of being arrogant on a film set.

 

When the first Harry Potter movie came out. I was one night watching the " Late Show With David Letterman ". The late great actor Richard Harris was the main guest on the program. Mr Harris seemed to have a bone to pick with Mr Radcliffe. It seemed that on the very first day of shooting for the first Harry Potter movie, the actors had a read through. Now bear in mind that Richard Harris was already established and an experienced actor before the Harry Potter movies. At the read through, Mr Harris reads a line and Radcliffe decides to become a critic. He starts giving a lecture to Mr Harris and his inability to make the lines effective. Richard Harris is telling this to Dave and the audience is cracking up. Mr Harris quite rightly pointed that no one else complained but Mr Radcliffe and later it was Radcliffe who almost lost his job because director Chris Columbus didn't think Daniel could keep with thespian performers like Richard Harris and Maggie Smith. It was nice to see Harris point that out on Letterman. Radcliffe will be a future hottie with the potential to be a huge SOB.

 

Rohale

[VaHawk]

>I totally agree that Daniel Radcliffe gets better with age.

>If he carries on acting and choses some intelligent roles, he

>has the potetential to be a Cary Grant or Hugh Grant of his

>generation. He also has a reputation of being arrogant on a

>film set.

 

LMFAO! No way this nerdy, pukey little boy toy could even dare to be compared to Cary Grant!!!! who was ONE of a kind! Anyone who would compare this pukey kid to Cary, should pull the tampon out of his ass and shoot his shit into the nearest commode!

 

Hugh Grant, maybe, as imo, he is a real pukey, lily assed actor, who basically plays the SAME character in EVERY movie!

 

>At the read through, Mr Harris reads a line and Radcliffe decides to

>become a critic. He starts giving a lecture to Mr Harris and

>his inability to make the lines effective. Richard Harris is

>telling this to Dave and the audience is cracking up. Mr

>Harris quite rightly pointed that no one else complained but

>Mr Radcliffe and later it was Radcliffe who almost lost his

>job because director Chris Columbus didn't think Daniel could

>keep with thespian performers like Richard Harris and Maggie

>Smith. It was nice to see Harris point that out on Letterman.

> Radcliffe will be a future hottie with the potential to be a

>huge SOB.

 

What the HELL is your point? No FUCKING WAY that this twerp Radcliffe has any right to criticize the acting ability of the acting icons of Richard Harris and/or Maggie Smith. Isn't that why the audience cracked up?! I don't doubt that he is already a HUGE SOB!, but until he branches out into other critically acclaimed acting roles, I will consider him to be NOTHING other than the British equivalent of McCauley Caulkin in the Home Alone movies! In other words, a one time WONDER in a one time defining role, with no realistic expectations to exceed his limited niche!

[Guest rohale]

>

>LMFAO! No way this nerdy, pukey little boy toy could even

>dare to be compared to Cary Grant!!!! who was ONE of a kind!

>Anyone who would compare this pukey kid to Cary, should pull

>the tampon out of his ass and shoot the shit in the commode!

>

>

>Hugh Grant, maybe, as imo, he is a real pukey, lily assed

>actor, who basically plays the SAME character in EVERY mo

>

>What the HELL IS YOUR POINT? NO FUCKING WAY that this twerp

>Radcliffe has any right to criticize the acting ability of the

>acting icons of Richard Harris and/or Maggie Smith. Isn't that

>why the audience cracked up?! I don't doubt that he is

>already a HUGE SOB!, but until he branches out into other

>critically acclaimed acting roles, I will consider him to be

>NOTHING other than the British equivalent of McCauley Caulkin

>in the Home Alone movies! In other words, a one time WONDER in

>a one time defining role, with no realistic expectations to

>exceed his limited niche!

>

>

>

 

Nah, I think the tampon is perfectly fine where. As long as it's up there cleaning the prostate, no problem. Shooting the shit to the commode, too lazy for the target and besides it's too far for a shot.

 

Cary Grant is considered one of a kind nowadays but back then when he was under contract with MGM, they only saw him as an actor who could deliver in romantic leads. Grant often found himself being offered roles that Humphrey Bogart and Howard Leslie would turn down. Grant was never a commercial successs at the box office compared to some of his peers but a good face for the camera.

 

Radcliffe maybe a pukey kid but he still has the chance to prove himself in the next year or so. It's too early at stage to tell if he could be just another one hit wonder.

 

As for Letterman's audience, it was the way Richard Harris was telling the story, Harris couldn't give a fuck what people thought of him. That's how he always did interviews and he was brilliant.

 

Rohale