Jump to content

RB Tony Callandro---NYC


Guest RexB
This topic is 3437 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Hey Rex, Do you have a spare room or would he have to share your bed?:eek:

 

~ Boomer ~

Boomer,

Actually, I do have a spare room but I don't think my partner would go for having another roommate living here regardless of how defined his six-(or eight)pack was.

Posted
I think he is strictly muscle worship. The only review of him (I've seen) can be found at this blogspot....

http://www.philadelphiabodybuilding.blogspot.com/2012/06/hiring-jersey-shore-college-guido-brawn.html

 

That is indeed a great blogspot, thanks for posting. Keep in mind that the description of the session with Tony on this blog dates all the way back to 2012. As do many reviews about him on the muscleservicestation.com forum ... It is certainly taking Tony a long time to pay off the student loans.

  • 6 months later...
Posted

I met Tony Callandro this afternoon after all this time. Quite Satisfactory. Thanks to keeping an email from him at the time I started this topic (August 2015) I recently sent Tony a message asking if he's currently seeing clients and he is. He's also up for meeting new clients so he gave me permission to post his email address here: [email protected].

Posted
A straight guy who is willing to let you feel his muscles for $400 an hour?

 

He's a lot more interactive than just letting you feel his muscles. In fact, he's the most or at least one of the most interactive escorts of the 54 (yes, I'm keeping count) that I've met. Also, setting up a meeting with Tony is a pleasure. He's quick to respond, writes in full clear sentences with punctuation (a rare courtesy these days) and is a happy person who is a joy to be with.

 

He has a channel on YouTube with 2 vids posted, so far. They seem to be a few years old, but impressive regardless

 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcASLyhRwaqDJIThbLOYltw

 

Tony looks fantastic today, better than on those Youtubes. His lower body is very impressive, too, from the front AND from the rear (yum).

Posted

Tony has promised to send me some pics that I can make available to anyone who requests them. I haven't gotten them yet but should have them later today.

He lives in northern New Jersey. He doesn't do incalls. He came to my place in Brooklyn yesterday.

Posted

I have received a first batch of photos from Tony. He's going to take more and send them to me soon. Anyone who is interested send me your email address in a private message and I'll send the pics to you.

Posted

Tony sent me another group of pictures that he took yesterday. (That's two batches of pics in all, for those who have already contacted me and received both sets of pics.)

For the rest of you, be sure to include your email address in your private message to me if you'd like to receive them.

Posted
He's a lot more interactive than just letting you feel his muscles. In fact, he's the most or at least one of the most interactive escorts of the 54 (yes, I'm keeping count) that I've met. Also, setting up a meeting with Tony is a pleasure. He's quick to respond, writes in full clear sentences with punctuation (a rare courtesy these days) and is a happy person who is a joy to be with.

 

I don't mean this to be a criticism. But for this to have real meaning to most of us we'd need to know who a majority of these other 53 are and what kind of activities you like to do. Otherwise statements like this don't mean a lot.

 

My vague recollection is that you are more into a muscle worship type of experience which is certainly fine. But someone who is 'most interactive' in your view of encounters may, with the exact same level of activity, be a 'least interactive' guy to those who aren't into muscle worship.

Posted
I don't mean this to be a criticism. But for this to have real meaning to most of us we'd need to know who a majority of these other 53 are and what kind of activities you like to do. Otherwise statements like this don't mean a lot.

 

My vague recollection is that you are more into a muscle worship type of experience which is certainly fine. But someone who is 'most interactive' in your view of encounters may, with the exact same level of activity, be a 'least interactive' guy to those who aren't into muscle worship.

 

I'm not going to go listing all the guys I've hired and blaring out on the forum what I do with the guys I meet, no matter whose leering eyes are hungry to see them. When I use the term 'interactive' I use it to mean that from the git-go the guy is freely communicative and responsive to questions or requests placed before him by text or email, not one who is communicatively constipated and responds with one-word replies if he replies at all within a week. I mean that he displays some enthusiasm for setting up an appointment and going through with it by checking in and putting in his part of the energy needed to make the thing happen, rather than me having to chase him down for every answer and having to repeatedly ask questions that are vital to my making a decision about whether to hire him. Everybody knows what I'm talking about and how much better the final experience is if you didn't have to drag the other party into it. By 'interactive' I mean that no matter what kind of activities, sexual or otherwise, that we engage in he's got some willingness to participate with gusto. I don't use it to mean that he will do EVERYTHING sexual in every direction---top, bottom, active, passive, whatever.

 

I don't mean this to be a criticism, but I can't help but notice that there's an attitude that the only REAL sex is anal penetration and that everything else is foreplay and somehow not complete or total. Well, who the fig decided that? It's an attitude I don't share in one jot, so commandeering the term 'interactive' to mean he'll fuck or get fucked is perverting language to suit one group's sexual preferences.

Posted
I'm not going to go listing all the guys I've hired and blaring out on the forum what I do with the guys I meet, no matter whose leering eyes are hungry to see them. When I use the term 'interactive' I use it to mean that from the git-go the guy is freely communicative and responsive to questions or requests placed before him by text or email, not one who is communicatively constipated and responds with one-word replies if he replies at all within a week. I mean that he displays some enthusiasm for setting up an appointment and going through with it by checking in and putting in his part of the energy needed to make the thing happen, rather than me having to chase him down for every answer and having to repeatedly ask questions that are vital to my making a decision about whether to hire him. Everybody knows what I'm talking about and how much better the final experience is if you didn't have to drag the other party into it. By 'interactive' I mean that no matter what kind of activities, sexual or otherwise, that we engage in he's got some willingness to participate with gusto. I don't use it to mean that he will do EVERYTHING sexual in every direction---top, bottom, active, passive, whatever.

 

I don't mean this to be a criticism, but I can't help but notice that there's an attitude that the only REAL sex is anal penetration and that everything else is foreplay and somehow not complete or total. Well, who the fig decided that? It's an attitude I don't share in one jot, so commandeering the term 'interactive' to mean he'll fuck or get fucked is perverting language to suit one group's sexual preferences.

 

 

You are right that there can be many definitions of interactive. But at least 80% of your definition here is about pre-meeting arrangements. There are other ways to state this-such as 'the guy responded promptly to questions and corresponded well."

 

I must admit (mea culpa here) that I probably wouldn't have responded to your initial post, but I was having a definite senior moment (I would have classified it as a 'middle-aged' moment. But I don't know anyone who is 110:(). When I read your recommendation, I knew something struck me as being off. My head was buzzing with the question, "Why when RexB says an escort is interactive, does it ring a warning alert in my mind?"

 

It was only when I started writing my previous post that I really remembered you prefer a more limited set of activities than many of us. There's nothing wrong with that.

 

However I'm willing to venture that a large number of us on here usually refer to the word 'interactive' as meaning how the escort acts when we are actually in each other's presence and how far he will go in sharing himself. But I guess that's really neither here nor there in the final analysis. I'm not an immortel from the Académie Anglais, I can't prescribe how a word is used.

 

I just need to remember that I probably won't ever be interested in your picks except on an aesthetic basis. And you definitely have picked an aesthetically fine gentleman in young Mr. Callendro. :rolleyes:

 

Gman

Posted
...statements like this don't mean a lot.

 

Gman, I'd say your critiques of my comments are about as lacking in meaning as you purport my comments about the interactiveness of escorts to be. I'm not in the mood to defend my comments or attack anyone's (same thing really) so I think I will now just blow up this newly-acquired photo of Tony Callandro's butthole that I am the sole owner of to full screen size and do a bit of evening contemplation in my quest for meaning.

Posted
Gman, I'd say your critiques of my comments are about as lacking in meaning as you purport my comments about the interactiveness of escorts to be. I'm not in the mood to defend my comments or attack anyone's (same thing really) so I think I will now just blow up this newly-acquired photo of Tony Callandro's butthole that I am the sole owner of to full screen size and do a bit of evening contemplation in my quest for meaning.

 

 

May you and Tony have a pleasant evening.

 

Gman

Posted
Who's Tony exactly and does he have a profile somewhere?

 

I think he is simply a guy in good shape who does private meetings in the Philadelphia area to raise money for his expenses.....see the phillybodybuilding blog link upthread (was posted in 2012, evidently).....no current profile (his privacy preference, I suppose)....may've had old profiles (like the old rentboy ad above) to get his foot in the door, but no more, currently

Posted

I first became aware of Tony through his Rentboy ad where I emailed him and started up a brief correspondence on the subject of getting together and then followed by an amiable long period of no contact until just a couple of weeks ago when I wrote Tony asking if he still sees clients and meets new ones. He said yes to both so I booked him for an outcall to my house. He didn't seem to be aware of Rentmen until I asked him if he advertised and he said he didn't because he didn't know of where to place one. I told him about Rentmen and followed up by text to remind him. Well today he said his first Rentmen ad should be up next week listed as serving NYC, but that in June he's moving to Philly so the listing would change location then, too. In the meantime he's equally willing to travel to either of those cities and to travel anywhere, as a matter of fact, during these four months before he starts a new job. Some may remember with a chuckle a line in Tony's RB ad stating that he was meeting clients to put himself through graduate school. Now he has his doctorate and is meeting clients to pay off student loans. So before the job starts in June Tony's availability is open to extensive travel.

As soon as Tony alerts me that his ad is up I'll post the link to it here.

Posted

Tony was definitely a great guy I enjoyed my time with him and I think he's very much a great hire! I definitely recommend him the cons I would say are that he's not the smartest guy but I give him a 10/10 for sure.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...