Headless Escorts

[TruHart1]

Raul's Clients including WG2

 

And WG2 is special too - he does share on occasion.

 

I have to say here that I have met a few of Raul's clients and I've found they are ALL special people!

 

TruHart1

[rvwnsd]

There are 9578346823982292792042082040840824 escorts at any given time who show their face. Only about 15 of us don't.

 

Actually, 9578346823982292792042082040840823 show their faces and 16 of you don't. I counted.

 

But seriously...I've hired guys who did and did not show their faces and have yet to be disappointed, although I have met guys who photograph much better than they appear in real life. I suppose a face pic is very important if you are looking for an specific facial type. If you have varied tastes (like me) or your definition of "handsome" varies from that of the Hollywood ideal (like me) it is less important. That being said, most of the men whose ads did not show their faces turned out to be quite good-looking.

 

Two cases in point: Bryan in LA ( www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=579922 ) and the afore-mentioned Raul G Manzo. I did not see Raul's face pic before I hired him. I went on instinct and on the multiple conversations and email exchanges we had and found him to be very attractive. Bryan provided a face pic before we met, but if memory serves correctly I decided to hire him (but might not have articulated that decision to him, for what it is worth) before seeing it. At any rate, I find him very handsome and think he is one of the most attractive men I have met in a very long time.

[Guest]

I think it wouldn't be a surprise to those who spend a lot of time on this message board that both face and body are very important to me. It's very rare for me to hire someone who doesn't show both his face and his body, unless I'm in a market where that just isn't possible (i.e. small towns), and, even then, I would have to have some indication that I would find the guy attractive. I can fully understand why an escort wouldn't want to show his face. After all, once you do, you're definitely not anonymous any more, no matter what fake name you use. And if you ever come into the public eye under your real name, such as if you become a legitimate model, actor, politician, etc. (or getting arrested), everyone will instantly know about your past. After all, hiring escorts and watching porn are NOT activities that only a small minority of the public does. But if I shell out my $$, I really want to know what I'm getting. When I'm about to spend $200 or more, I am no mood to do the hiring blind. I may be in a minority, but the penis itself is much, much lower in importance than face or body for me. If I led a public life in which I wouldn't want others to know I'm hiring escorts (for example, if I were a politician), then I could see the interest in hiring a headless escort to take out about town. Even then, I think that most people would assume that if I go out with someone who's a good 20 years younger than I am, that there's some sort of financial transaction going on.

[Rod Hagen]

If you like a faceless escort's ad, ask the escort to device you a face photo.

[rvwnsd]

If you like a faceless escort's ad, ask the escort to device you a face photo.

 

Wait a second, Rod. Are you suggesting we use our communication skills and ask for something we want?

[+ quoththeraven]

I've thought of four more well-known escorts who don't show face pics. Given that two of the nine have already been identified, either by name or implicitly, here's the list:

 

Raul G. Manzo

Chris Eisenhower

Juan Bruno/Juan Vancouver

Legendary Dave

Steven Draker

Rod Hagen

Dane Scott

SteveEscort

Kyle Vong

 

I'm sure there's others, but these are the ones I've thought or been reminded of since this thread was started.

[Becket]

For me it's THE most important thing, aside from not being an ***hole. I can deal with most any other size and shape. I do enjoy a curved erection when I can get 'em. Who was that guy in Nashville a few years back? He has since retired. His was amazing. cheers