Today's Mikey/Aaron review

[docred]

I must be a major cynic, but does anyone else find today's review of this guy as more than a bit weird??

 

Today's review is so similar to his second review that it's hard to take seriously. Both are grammatically badly written...basically both are one long sentence with no punctuation. Both use simple words and give over-the-top critiques.

 

These two reviews follow his first review in which the client claims to have been ripped of for $500. That one, sadly, has the ring of truth about it.

 

Daddy, please take a second look at this!

 

docred

[instudiocity]

I must be a major cynic, but does anyone else find today's review of this guy as more than a bit weird??

 

Today's review is so similar to his second review that it's hard to take seriously. Both are grammatically badly written...basically both are one long sentence with no punctuation. Both use simple words and give over-the-top critiques.

 

These two reviews follow his first review in which the client claims to have been ripped of for $500. That one, sadly, has the ring of truth about it.

 

Daddy, please take a second look at this!

 

docred

Um, that's yesterday's Mikey/Aaron review.

 

Please check the review process listed here: http://www.daddysreviews.com/faq

 

So when you question two reviews, you're questioning two phone numbers, two email addresses, and possibly, two MAC addresses along with two IP addresses. Trust Daddy to do the vetting, he knows much more about the posters than you could possibly know. And if he questions the review he will put a big ole Referee throwing a flag right there on the review.

 

flag.gif

[Frankly Rich]

Even if Daddy was suspicious, that wouldn't be enough to withhold the review, would it? Sometimes he just gives us the info and lets us decide. Who would even hire this guy after his first review anyway?

[docred]

Um, that's yesterday's Mikey/Aaron review.

 

So when you question two reviews, you're questioning two phone numbers, two email addresses, and possibly, two MAC addresses along with two IP addresses. Trust Daddy to do the vetting, he knows much more about the posters than you could possibly know. And if he questions the review he will put a big ole Referee throwing a flag right there on the review.

 

flag.gif

 

 

Thanks for the hand slap, instudiocity :o

 

How hard is it to use someone else's computer to post another review? Even a know-nothing such as myself might figure that out perhaps.

 

And my point was simply to draw attention to the review, and possibly nudge Daddy into checking further.

[TruHart1]

...Sometimes he just gives us the info and lets us decide. Who would even hire this guy after his first review anyway?

 

Hear hear, Frank! It behooves everyone to take note that Mikey appears to have so little regard for his professional reputation that he failed to post any kind of rebuttal or denial regarding that first review, which is actually just an accusation that he is nothing but a low-life crook, an outright thief stealing from unsuspecting clients! Why would anyone who read that first review ever hire this escort, let alone write a good review of him?

 

TruHart1

[imrthr]

I must be a major cynic, but does anyone else find today's review of this guy as more than a bit weird??

 

Today's review is so similar to his second review that it's hard to take seriously. Both are grammatically badly written...basically both are one long sentence with no punctuation. Both use simple words and give over-the-top critiques.

 

These two reviews follow his first review in which the client claims to have been ripped of for $500. That one, sadly, has the ring of truth about it.

 

Daddy, please take a second look at this!

 

docred

 

If you own or have access to one of a number of program that searches for plagiarism, the reviews will result in an interesting finding. Plagiarism programs are not found on "freeware" and, depending on which company wrote the program, can be costly. My friend putting the latest two "reviews" into one such program reveals that the text of the reviews was "most likely' written by the same person. The same person defined as the escort or a friend.

-

-

[+ Gar1eth]

I must be a major cynic, but does anyone else find today's review of this guy as more than a bit weird??

 

Today's review is so similar to his second review that it's hard to take seriously. Both are grammatically badly written...basically both are one long sentence with no punctuation. Both use simple words and give over-the-top critiques.

 

These two reviews follow his first review in which the client claims to have been ripped of for $500. That one, sadly, has the ring of truth about it.

 

Daddy, please take a second look at this!

 

docred

 

Um, that's yesterday's Mikey/Aaron review.

 

Please check the review process listed here: http://www.daddysreviews.com/faq

 

So when you question two reviews, you're questioning two phone numbers, two email addresses, and possibly, two MAC addresses along with two IP addresses. Trust Daddy to do the vetting, he knows much more about the posters than you could possibly know. And if he questions the review he will put a big ole Referee throwing a flag right there on the review.

 

flag.gif

 

Not that I don't trust Daddy- and I'm definitely grateful for all the hard work he does. But as they say, even Homer nods at times. I would say that the possibility of Reviews #2 and #3 being written by separate people is zero to none. How often have two consecutive reviews read like someone high on speed who has no idea what the use of a comma, semicolon, or even a period is for? Personally unless the reviews were fake, I can't ever remember reading two such alike consecutive reviews.

 

Gman

[maninsoma]

Not that I don't trust Daddy- and I'm definitely grateful for all the hard work he does. But as they say, even Homer nods at times. I would say that the possibility of Reviews #2 and #3 being written by separate people is zero to none. How often have two consecutive reviews read like someone high on speed who has no idea what the use of a comma, semicolon, or even a period is for? Personally unless the reviews were fake, I can't ever remember reading two such alike consecutive reviews.

 

Gman

 

I agree. I just read all three of his reviews and it's clear that the last two were written by the same person. It's very easy to submit reviews from different devices on different networks using different email addresses for verification, so looking at that information isn't a foolproof method of weeding out fake reviews.

[Samai139]

When I saw yesterday's coverboy I wondered who would be attracted to him and so I read the reviews. I had the same reaction as others on this thread. Who would hire an escort after reading that first review? Someone who doesn't read the reviews? It made no sense to me but I put it down to "different strokes for different folks." Today's comments have certainly raised a lot more questions.

[zeyfur]

The style of writing of both reviews, sentences not separated by full stops , seem to be more than just a co-incidence.

[Michael Wayne]

I hope no one confuses this Mikey with me. just checking......