So many "satisfactories"

[gallahadesquire]

There seems to be a rush on the word "satisfactory" in daddy's reviews of late.

 

What I find interesting is that the reviews themselves are great ...

"I'll definately8 rehire him" kind of thing.

 

I though "Recommended" would be more appropriate.

 

Any input, fellas?

[Bosguy]

There seems to be a rush on the word "satisfactory" in daddy's reviews of late.

 

What I find interesting is that the reviews themselves are great ...

"I'll definately8 rehire him" kind of thing.

 

I though "Recommended" would be more appropriate.

 

Any input, fellas?

 

I agree and likewise don't understand why a very good review gets a satisfactory. Maybe we should have 4 categories: Highly recommended/ Recommended/ Satisfactory/ and Not Recommended. Daddy and moderators could set guidelines for use of each category, and the reviewer should have the option to give a brief reason why he chose that particular category. Just a thought

 

Boston Bill

[thickornotatall]

sometimes it's just "meh" sometimes a golden rush of hormones at the time cool to a flow of lava...just meh....Just being really honest is the most important part....Some reviews are so deep that I feel as if I were there...or read like a biilboard on I-95.....I read for "accuracy"....in terms of height/weight/being on time...and yes...cock size..when some writes 6-7"..and another write 9-10....I wonder what's up with that.....

Be honest for the next person that may hire....If you have a good "story" submit it to Readers Digest....

[rvwnsd]

I agree and likewise don't understand why a very good review gets a satisfactory. Maybe we should have 4 categories: Highly recommended/ Recommended/ Satisfactory/ and Not Recommended. Daddy and moderators could set guidelines for use of each category, and the reviewer should have the option to give a brief reason why he chose that particular category. Just a thought

 

Boston Bill

 

A very good review gets a "satisfactory" because there is no rating called "very good." I suggest splitting the rating from the recommendation, as follows:

 

Rating: Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, Very Good, Exceptional (or something like that)

Recommended: Yes or No

[+ Axiom2001]

I agree and likewise don't understand why a very good review gets a satisfactory. Maybe we should have 4 categories: Highly recommended/ Recommended/ Satisfactory/ and Not Recommended. Daddy and moderators could set guidelines for use of each category, and the reviewer should have the option to give a brief reason why he chose that particular category. Just a thought

 

Boston Bill

 

I ditto Bosguy's suggestion and would hope that Daddy would honor it! I think the suggested words add much more credence to the reviews.

[+ bigjoey]

Agree; often I would have given an "exceptional" rating rather than just "satisfactory" but had to settle for "satisfactory".

[Irtwo]

Agree; often I would have given an "exceptional" rating rather than just "satisfactory" but had to settle for "satisfactory".

 

But why would you not just put "recommend"?

[+ bigjoey]

Sorry, I should have said "recommended"; the point was there is no way to show when someone is "exceptional" except in the body of the review. However, for the reader who is just looking at the ratings and not reading the full review the exceptional nature of the escort is missed. The ratings could use another classification to call out the very best. There are some amazing men out there that deserve a special classification of recognition.