BAD ESCORT CALL!!

[Doug69]

>Actually, David, I think we do understand the facts.

 

I must say - being new here, the only thing I had read about what David did was that he gave some false information to the DMV in what appeared (although what I read was unclear) to be an attempt to get lower insurance rates or some such thing. I was not aware of the more extensive schemes he was engaging in, which would have mitigated if not eliminated my defense of him. Nonetheless, there is still this point . . .

 

>My only point is that if you're going to go through

>life dealing with every problem that comes up by pulling

>various scams it's pretty ironic for you to come here and

>complain when someone else scams you.

 

I don't think that what David is doing is right, but at the same time, he's very young, poor and, it seems clear, is acting out of desperation, need, and confusion -- rather than malice.

 

Regardless of how many things he's doing that are wrong, it doesn't justify or render any less blameworthy the deceitful, harmful conduct engaged in by this lying client.

 

One other thing I feel compelled to note: it is interesting how you were so dismissive of perjury in civil proceedings on the ground that this offense is exceedingly common, and yet you don't seem to apply this permissive attitude to David's equally common (at least) offenses. Why is that?

[woodlawn]

>Regardless of how many things he's doing that are wrong, it

>doesn't justify or render any less blameworthy the deceitful,

>harmful conduct engaged in by this lying client.

 

 

I didn't say that it does justify it. For the fourth or fifth time, my only point is that it's mighty ironic for someone who goes through life pulling scam after scam (and who even finds it funny -- "I'm just visiting, officer . . . hehehe") to ask for sympathy when he gets treated the same way he routinely treats others.

 

Harmful conduct? This joker tricked David into taking his shirt off and wasted some of his time. I hope that's the worst thing that ever happens to him in the course of his career as a prostitute. If it is, he can think himself fortunate indeed.

 

 

>One other thing I feel compelled to note: it is interesting

>how you were so dismissive of perjury in civil proceedings on

>the ground that this offense is exceedingly common, and yet

>you don't seem to apply this permissive attitude to David's

>equally common (at least) offenses. Why is that?

 

On the contrary, if you read my post you will see that I specifically stated I have no wish to berate David for the scams he's pulled since there are plenty of people who do the same and worse. A couple of people here have complained that your responses sometimes suggest you haven't read the post you're responding to. In this case they might be right.

[bigguyinpasadena]

David,please don't feed the trolls.

Good luck on your trip.

To bad some of these fellas are so old that they can't remember their days of youthful hijinx(or perhaps they were all model citizens-WHAT A BORE!)A stick up the ass will do that to you?

Iknow ,I know,Now who is feeding the trolls!

[Guest Bitchboy]

This fuck is still alive??? Shit. I had so hoped he was a D.C. drug dealer I read about recently. I guess not. Am I correct?

[bigguyinpasadena]

Bitchboy,to whom are you refering?

[Guest Bitchboy]

Certainly not you, big guy - you have to follow those little dotted lines to see where the comments refer. I daresay the target won't miss it. He never does. Does he??

[Gigiloz4me]

Two things... First, It was nice of you to pay your buddy for taking the trip. When friends help me out with my business, they get paid. Second... don't let idiots like that make you jaded otherwise they 'win' in some twisted way... they'll get theirs.