Red Flag on Sean #3 Response to Bad Review Today: Moderators Please Correct

[William]

Daddy Sez: "Private Information removed"

That Sean #3 would play such a dirty trick, and slip it by the Moderators, who do a careful job of screening for this sort of thing, speaks volumes about his professionalism and suggests some degree of sociopathy as well.

 

Just my thoughts . . . .

[Kevin Slater]

It is my understanding that moderators moderate this message forum, not the associated review site. For that, you want to send a message to Daddy at [email protected].

 

Kevin Slater

[excelntsvc]

I will admit that I wonder about the name and town ... but I did not find Sean's response to be condescending ... it comes down to a he said vs he said ... somewhere in the middle is the "real story"

[anotherjohnindupont]

"Maybe he is angry because he was expecting me to move to (alleged first name of the client, in the English language it applies to males and females alike), and change my name to (beginning of the alleged city where the client lives)… LOL, I don't think that would go well in (abbreviation of the client's alleged state, 1/50).. Haha..."

 

Nostradamus was more clear.

 

Even when I was young I couldn't cum twice and top a guy, I could barely cum once and top the guy after 30 mins, but maybe I'm not that sexual.

[maninsoma]

That was my response, too. Apart from the questionable revelation of client information, I thought the response was better than most that get posted in response to negative reviews.

 

I will admit that I wonder about the name and town ... but I did not find Sean's response to be condescending ... it comes down to a he said vs he said ... somewhere in the middle is the "real story"

[+ deej]

[email protected][/email].

 

Kevin Slater

 

This is correct.

[seeker630]

I will admit that I wonder about the name and town ... but I did not find Sean's response to be condescending ... it comes down to a he said vs he said ... somewhere in the middle is the "real story"

 

I thought the escort's response was fairly balanced UNTIL the sentences about changing his name & moving to the client's presumed city - that seemed to come out of nowhere and did seem a bit condescending to me! And if that was indeed the client's last name, then it was indiscreet, IMO.

 

I did notice that Sean lists his age as 24 but his reviews here go back at least 7 years (& he was listed in his 20's then).

[Frequentflier]

I thought the escort's response was fairly balanced UNTIL the sentences about changing his name & moving to the client's presumed city - that seemed to come out of nowhere and did seem a bit condescending to me! And if that was indeed the client's last name, then it was indiscreet, IMO.

 

I did notice that Sean lists his age as 24 but his reviews here go back at least 7 years (& he was listed in his 20's then).

 

I don't think I've ever seen a different picture than what's been showing in his ad for - like - forever. I noticed this morning that even though his ad has a phone number on M4RN (suggesting its active), there is an N/A in the Advertiser since field. Maybe Sean figured out clients can do the math. Other than the reviewer we don't know what he really looks like. I think a fair number of guys get more attractive as they mature (me for example...haha) and an escort that is using old photos might be worried about something they shouldn't be. Out of shape is a completely other issue. I don't know how many people Sean dupes with old pictures and a well understated age, but unless he's out of shape he might get more clients with real pictures.

[Jaker27]

Whenever they pull the "I'm Bi" out that makes me a little suspicious. Like why would you put that even in there. I get what went down though. It was non receptacle or one sided sex. No denying that. The question is what was said or expected beforehand. Since this guy seems to be a newby it's my guess we had a major communication issue going on.

[Guy Fawkes]

Cleaning up your ca-ca...

 

Gentlemen,

 

Why am I cleaning up your ca-ca? It has been well known for over a decade that the message board and the website are separate entities.

 

It is also well known over that same decade that I don't like private information showing up on the message center.

 

Now we have a rather gentle man on the east coast, that has been absolutely scandalized because somebody couldn't be discrete. This is the type of bullshit is what caused Hooboy and now myself to wonder if your worth the fucking effort.

 

I'm not going to give time outs when I'm so pissed off that I'm spitting nails.

 

Yes, I missed the references. It was the reviewer that had to explain the references. He was the only one that was qualified to do so.

 

But having it become a point of contention in the M/C without a single damn one of you sending an email so that I could drag my ass out of bed and fix it, is unforgivable.

 

Now give me some lip; earn a time-out.

 

http://www.shipmentoffail.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/081809-elephant-shit-catcher.jpg