411 on Hothorndog NYC

[Irtwo]

This guy looks familiar, but I'm not sure. Anyone have info/experience? Thanks.

 

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=342877&iid=180359&scid=91654683&sp=5&pos=95&locid=1569

[ross06]

Looks too good to be true

[+ poolboy48220]

The ad says cut but he doesn't look cut in the antepenultimate picture. My gut tells me the pictures are not him.

 

Pet peeve: I'm a fan of the furry boys, and the number of ads whose "Body Hair" description doesn't match the pics always bugs me. I guess it's a matter of debate if a wisp of treasure trail qualifies as "Somewhat hairy", but to me, the body hair description refers to chest. I do like the "Legs Only" that often appears on Daddy's Reviews. it's very specific. (And I do love hairy legs too )

[Nvr2Thick]

hothorndog

 

don't understand his handle. Why would one of these ho's call himself thorn dog?

[William]

Just my two cents, but the ad screams "red flags":

 

1. Yes, the third photo from the end depicts an uncut penis, not the cut one claimed in the ad.

2. The ad makes very vague promises, followed by a laundry list of activities. Some of the earmarks of a "worship my body and get off quickly" kind of experience.

3. Rather tentatively, the photos themselves make me suspicious. Some of them look like model ads, but not the same models necessarily. Can someone (with more technical ability than I have) run a photo check to see if these body shots have been taken from model ads?

4. And of course no reviews anywhere. Like the other factors, this is far from dispositive--but like them it suggests that anyone contacting this guy should proceed with caution.

[Lewis H]

First pic is from an underwear brand called Jack Adams.

http://www.underwear-swap.com/2012/07/10/jack-adams-bodyflex-mesh-jockstrap/

 

Fourth pic from the bottom has been around a while, and I think I've seen Igor Renzi/Guccissimo also use it on occasion (might be a Rick Day, his favorite source for Personal Pics Of Some Other Person)

 

Cock pic second from the bottom has been around since 2009 at least, various porn sites.

 

If the second to the fourth pics are him (and they seem consistent) he may just be too lazy to take pics of his dick, or just wanted to augment his ad with found photos. He still might be hot, just lazy. lol

[Irtwo]

Thanks guys He's very tempting. The fact that he accepts credit cards, I thought, maybe gave him some credibility, but I don't know.

[BaronArtz]

As Eliot Spitzer found out, paying for certain services by credit card is not a good idea. In addition, I don't see how that would help his credibility.

[Glenn1441]

I busted this dude using photos that aren't his. The telltale photo, now removed, is a photo that Simon NYC has featured in his ad for some time now. I've hired Simon and though his photos are flattering and can give the impression they are not of him, they are. The associate who takes his photos knows how to make the most of perspective and vantage point. At any rate, Mr. Horndog was forced to take down the photo as Simon followed through and was able to prove the photo was his. And Horndog's response to me when I queried him? Well, put it this way: He lied. So there you have it. Seems we have an epidemic of late of, ahem, 'borrowed' photos.

[Irtwo]

Did this happen some time ago? I don't see any photos missing from the link. I'm still thinking (hoping) that Lewore may be right, that Horndog maybe just wanted to augment his real photos with some found photos.

[Glenn1441]

Just the other week. The photo in question was a small thumbnail. Torso-shot of a man removing a white t-shirt. That photo does in fact belong to Simon NYC. Horndog was forced to take it down.