Jump to content

Patrick Bateman/NYC REVIEW or Lack of


JT Brooklyn
This topic is 4433 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Todays Review..IF I was to ever lay out $400 for One Hour with a Working Guy... I definitely would be giving DETAILS! :rolleyes:

 

This Review reads like nothing more than an AD..IMHO of course!

 

I'd much rather DO Today's cute Cover Guy Diego/FT Laud for 2 Hours and tell the tale!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, the review was too general, but I do have to say I agree with the reviewer. I've been with Pat, and although I never wrote a review, I do have to say I would recommend him.

 

I second that -- I was with Pat a few times and always had a hot experience with him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No - His pics are kind out old --- But he still looks as hot :)

 

It has always been my thinking that a Dude who puts himself in the "Top Tier Rate Wise" better keep Current Pix's in his AD! ;)

 

We as Clients are Paying Big Bucks for the NOW not the WHEN looks wise! Still looking Hot does not cut it..Maybe at $200 it might for some...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 ADS running at the same time on Rentboy plus whatever other sites..This dude has an Exspensive Marketing Plan that the $400 an Hour guys SEEM TO BE supporting :confused

 

"Dorian Grey"? Strange Stage Name Choice as that Name always relates to a much Older Guy than he looks? Unless Bateman isn't 29 anymore :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat is great, but I guess for those who have never been with him want to hear a few more details about the encounter maybe? Especially because 400 is a bit steep for an escort, so maybe just saying basically "he was great" is too general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm the one who posted the review of Pat Bateman. Sorry if it was too general or uninformative. I'm pretty new here and am not sure what else needs to be said. Happy to provide more info if you'd like.

 

Welcome, robgold. There's lot of debate about how much detail to put in a review, and different people have different comfort levels. The purpose of a review, in my opinion, is to share your experience in such a way as to allow readers to determine if THEY would likely have a satisfying encounter with the escort. Most readers will want to know if the escort was a good kisser, oral, top and/or bottom, etc., I think. What an escort adverstises is not always what he actually does, so it's good to have confirmation. People also want to know about attitude, hygiene, and how the reality measured up to the ad (both pictures and text).

 

Think about a restaurant review. "I had a good meal at the China Garden" vs. "I had the dumplings and they were excellent, as was the Kung Pao chicen and the Mongolian beef, which was moderately spicy'."

 

I believe that the more details you provide, the better. And that goes for what you say about yourself as well - top, bottom, versatile, oral only? If you only say YOU were plaesed, but we don't know your preferences, we can't infer much. Bateman advertises as versatile but there's much of a clue in your review as to what he actually did to you or for you.

 

Just some things to think about when you write your next review. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome, robgold. There's lot of debate about how much detail to put in a review, and different people have different comfort levels. The purpose of a review, in my opinion, is to share your experience in such a way as to allow readers to determine if THEY would likely have a satisfying encounter with the escort. Most readers will want to know if the escort was a good kisser, oral, top and/or bottom, etc., I think. What an escort adverstises is not always what he actually does, so it's good to have confirmation. People also want to know about attitude, hygiene, and how the reality measured up to the ad (both pictures and text).

 

Think about a restaurant review. "I had a good meal at the China Garden" vs. "I had the dumplings and they were excellent, as was the Kung Pao chicen and the Mongolian beef, which was moderately spicy'."

 

I believe that the more details you provide, the better. And that goes for what you say about yourself as well - top, bottom, versatile, oral only? If you only say YOU were plaesed, but we don't know your preferences, we can't infer much. Bateman advertises as versatile but there's much of a clue in your review as to what he actually did to you or for you.

 

Just some things to think about when you write your next review. :)

 

I really wish this escort had given a little more thought into choosing his name—every time I see this thread it gives me a twinge of unease. And especially with Twinky Von Psycho making the rounds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish this escort had given a little more thought into choosing his name—every time I see this thread it gives me a twinge of unease. And especially with Twinky Von Psycho making the rounds...

 

The name wass unfamiliar to me until I Googled it - i never saw the movie or read the movie.

 

His new name is equally weird. Perhaps meant to imply he retains his youthful looks, but as someone else pointed out, it also implies he might be MUCH older than he appears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The name wass unfamiliar to me until I Googled it - i never saw the movie or read the movie.

 

His new name is equally weird. Perhaps meant to imply he retains his youthful looks, but as someone else pointed out, it also implies he might be MUCH older than he appears.

 

My initial reaction to seeing the name for the first time was: "is this a joke?" It would be the equivalent of naming yourself Charles Manson, Escort. And while I suppose there's a small chance he might not be familiar with his fictional counterpart—I doubt it. And that makes the idea of hiring him that much creepier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Magnus
My initial reaction to seeing the name for the first time was: "is this a joke?" It would be the equivalent of naming yourself Charles Manson, Escort. And while I suppose there's a small chance he might not be familiar with his fictional counterpart—I doubt it. And that makes the idea of hiring him that much creepier.

 

Yeah, but Christian Bale was smoking' HOT in that movie....

http://a1.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/profile01/151/16a42b1657574424aa81085bd6c68788/p.jpg

 

http://intothegloss.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads2/2012/03/shower.jpg

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pHOkId-M_Ig/T1ScdUOX6kI/AAAAAAAABMs/kqqXsZTdg3Q/s640/christian-bale-american-psycho-la-guarida-de-kovack.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but Christian Bale was smoking' HOT in that movie....

http://a1.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/profile01/151/16a42b1657574424aa81085bd6c68788/p.jpg

 

http://intothegloss.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads2/2012/03/shower.jpg

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pHOkId-M_Ig/T1ScdUOX6kI/AAAAAAAABMs/kqqXsZTdg3Q/s640/christian-bale-american-psycho-la-guarida-de-kovack.jpg

 

Nope. Creeeeepyyyy. NO like, no like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...