What happend to complete descretion assured???

[Guest joeburger]

I am learning that some clients, not mine, are very open and candid about the business of others especially other escorts. Whatever happened to complete descretion? None of my clients talk, gossip, what not, nor do they want to cross paths with other clients. My clients don't ask me about other clients and ask questions that are none of their business about my sessions with others. I ensure complete descretion with my clients. Why is it that I'm hearing that some clients don't pay the same respect to some of the escorts out there???

 

 

Joeburger

[jjkrkwood]

I am learning that some clients, not mine, are very open and candid about the business of others especially other escorts. Whatever happened to complete descretion? None of my clients talk, gossip, what not, nor do they want to cross paths with other clients. My clients don't ask me about other clients and ask questions that are none of their business about my sessions with others. I ensure complete descretion with my clients. Why is it that I'm hearing that some clients don't pay the same respect to some of the escorts out there???

 

 

Joeburger

 

I'm sure the talk is not ONLY about escorts. Some people just have a very "SHARING" personality and will discuss anything with anyone. Its their Nature.

[+ glutes]

Why is it that I'm hearing that some clients don't pay the same respect to some of the escorts out there??? Joeburger

 

It is called 'word of mouth'...

[JT Brooklyn]

There are those "Working Guys" I'm sure especially in Big Markets who donot mind the "Free Publicity" at all.

 

IF you are doing Biz in Central Mass I can see where it may be more of a problem than a good thing.

[jgoo]

Well a great deal of the message board forum involves discussing escorts, including direct experiences. I guess those of us that participate may be considered indiscrete but I've never thought of it that way. Certainly there is a line in disclosing information but otherwise it is very useful to share opinions, experiences, etc. So I am somewhat at a loss to understand what the OP finds unacceptable.

[jjkrkwood]

Well a great deal of the message board forum involves discussing escorts, including direct experiences. I guess those of us that participate may be considered indiscrete but I've never thought of it that way. Certainly there is a line in disclosing information but otherwise it is very useful to share opinions, experiences, etc. So I am somewhat at a loss to understand what the OP finds unacceptable.

 

My understanding was that he has issues which indiscretions outside this site, since this site IS designed for discussions about escorts. Perhaps his clients were seeking "pillow talk" about other escorts during their sessions. Personally, I only discuss my experiences with escorts outside this site with Friends who also hire. Otherwsie they would have no clue what the hell I was talking about, nor would they care. But while MY taste in escorts is VASTLY different from any of my friends, there wouldnt be any threat of us being with the same guy.

[jgoo]

My understanding was that he has issues which indiscretions outside this site, since this site IS designed for discussions about escorts. Perhaps his clients were seeking "pillow talk" about other escorts during their sessions. Personally, I only discuss my experiences with escorts outside this site with Friends who also hire. Otherwsie they would have no clue what the hell I was talking about, nor would they care. But while MY taste in escorts is VASTLY different from any of my friends, there wouldnt be any threat of us being with the same guy.

 

I guess I have problems understanding any distinction between discussing experiences on the forum, over private messages, phone talk, discussion over a beer, etc. Again, as long as a line that protects identity isn't crossed then they all seem the same (with the caveat of anonymity here and perhaps a wider dispersion of the points discussed). I don't think that because this site is designed to discuss escorts makes it more or less acceptable to those who may feel discussing an escort experience isn't being discrete. I just personally never consider when I talk about an experience with an escort here or anywhere else as being indiscreet.

[jjkrkwood]

I guess I have problems understanding any distinction between discussing experiences on the forum, over private messages, phone talk, discussion over a beer, etc. Again, as long as a line that protects identity isn't crossed then they all seem the same (with the caveat of anonymity here and perhaps a wider dispersion of the points discussed). I don't think that because this site is designed to discuss escorts makes it more or less acceptable to those who may feel discussing an escort experience isn't being discrete. I just personally never consider when I talk about an experience with an escort here or anywhere else as being indiscreet.

 

Understood JG, but who really knows why Anything bugs Anyone ? It just does. I have no problem with it and always felt any publicity is good publicity. At the very least it brings the persons name to the forefront.

[Guest JackF]

I'm extremely confused.....

[josephga]

I would actually view those who write those play by play reviews as not being discrete

[jjkrkwood]

I'm extremely confused.....

 

Come sit by me. I'll straighten you out.

[corndog]

OK, I think I might get a lot of trouble for this opinion, but I think that escort/client discretion is somewhat of a one-way street.

 

If an escort has put himself out there by advertising his services, I don't feel that it indiscreet for people to discuss the details of those services, as long as the escorts "stage name" is used, and no information, like their address, that could link the escort name to the real identity is divulged.

 

Clients, on the other hand, don't generally have public pseudonyms and I believe that protection of their privacy is generally assumed to be part of the service offered.

[Bart]

I wish we had a bit more context from Joeburger as to what in particular was bothersome otherwise we are left to speculation and gossip. But I do disagree with a couple of points made here.

 

First to corndog, I could not disagree more with your statement that discretion is a one way street. A client should always respect a gentleman's privacy. Such as, a client has no right to snoop in a gentleman's luggage or overnight bag. If the call is at the gentleman's place, then he has entered the gentleman's private residence and should respect that. No going through cubbards, looking through his medications. If gentleman has in the course of the meeting discussed personal areas of his life such as who is dating, or issues with his family or his past, that information was given with the thought that the client would be discreet.

 

I will read on here how clients will describe a gentleman as distant in conversation, well how can a guy relax if he feels there is an individual taking notes on the conversations, soon to be in the latest gossip rag.

 

I also disagree with the statement that giving a detail review is not being discreet. The worst reviews for me are ones when the reviewer says I am keeping details to myself. Than why bother with saying anything but "I confirm all the statistical information is correct." I dont understand what is not being discreet in giving a review with some sexual details. This is an escort review site for guys looking for sex with another guy, how about reviews with some sex in it. God knows we are upset if a guy does not show his junk in his photos.

 

So I get the feeling Joe was referring to personal information being disclosed that is completely unrelated to the subject of hiring an escort.

[wayout]

Yes, a bit more context from Joeburger would be useful.

 

Discretion is not a one way street as everyone (both clients and escorts equally) deserve protection of their privacy. However, for better or worse, there is an acceptance (well perhaps more of an interest) in comparing notes on escorts and their performance, appearance, demeanor, etc. that does not translate equally to comparing notes on clients.

[corndog]

First to corndog, I could not disagree more with your statement that discretion is a one way street. A client should always respect a gentleman's privacy.

 

Just to be clear, I think privacy and discretion are very different topics. I totally agree that privacy should be respected.

[+ glutes]

What about a escort that 'outs' a client (clients profession and method of payment), to his other clients?

[jjkrkwood]

It kind of escapes me as to HOW clients will know who escorts are talking about unless its the clients friend or someone FAMOUS... Otherwise, its just conversation about some stranger, so what difference does it make. What if the escort made reference to a person without naming them ? What would that be considered ? therefore I think there is alot MORE to the OP than meets the eye, as has been said. Obviously some VERY personal line was crossed?

[rocky]

Joeburger; Mr. Journeyman; you don't think your clients are talking with others..let's be realistic. I'm someone who engages escorts, i.e. I pay them for a service. I indeed discuss these services with others as is done here. And I know for a fact that those I have engaged, i.e. escorts, as much as I think it's bad business have discussed my business with their other clients, which I find wrong. But it's happening all the time. Maybe it's the price we pay. I will say I confronted one of my regulars when I was told by one of his regulars about some of my certain habits; and I wasn't happy. Did it stop, I have no idea.

[Guest joeburger]

thankyou for all the responses. i will shed more light with more context but i was trying to be careful not to hint about anyone in particular because it really is about one guy. i wasn't referring to the discussions on the forum. i really meant outside the forum and how some tend to over step their boundaries in a client/escort business relationship.

[JT Brooklyn]

thankyou for all the responses. i will shed more light with more context but i was trying to be careful not to hint about anyone in particular because it really is about one guy. i wasn't referring to the discussions on the forum. i really meant outside the forum and how some tend to over step their boundaries in a client/escort business relationship.

 

I think maybe you should have been this specific in the First Place..BUT a No Name discussion usually goes nowhere BUT ya do get Opinions!

[+ Gar1eth]

What about a escort that 'outs' a client (clients profession and method of payment), to his other clients?

 

Ahh Glutes,

 

Gee, I wonder which escort you might be referring to.

 

Your a very naughty boy.

 

http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/lanak/lanak1104/lanak110400068/9312068-naughty-boy-with-a-bruise-under-his-eye-holding-a-slingshot-and-aiming-at-something.jpg

 

Gman

 

PS ? Does the formerly outed client still contribute to the Forum? I can't remember his nom de Forum for sure, but it seems like I haven't seen it in a long while.

[+ glutes]

Ahh Glutes,

 

Gee, I wonder which escort you might be referring to.

 

The offended client I do recall, but I can't remember which escort it was.

 

Perhaps jimboiNOTbn or KMEM can remember said escort. Hopefully they have WI-FI in their (respectively) Cessna Citations and Learjets...

[MiamiLooker]

The offended client I do recall, but I can't remember which escort it was.

 

Perhaps jimboiNOTbn or KMEM can remember said escort. Hopefully they have WI-FI in their (respectively) Cessna Citations and Learjets...

 

LOL....I'll bet the escort remembers them. A dossier on each of his clients can come in handy when trying to remember a birthday or the size of a bank account.

[+ glutes]

LOL....I'll bet the escort remembers them. A dossier on each of his clients can come in handy when trying to remember a birthday or the size of a bank account.

 

Or when writing his blog, or a hawking a "Tell-All" book around. Get those tail numbers right!

 

http://www.schemedesigners.com/images/Westman-Citation.jpg