Jump to content

Kolt reviewed today 8/29


Charlie
This topic is 5092 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is the second review, both by first time reviewers, and what I find odd is the discrepancies in almost all the stats, not great differences, but still... In his ad, all the photos show someone with apparently dark hair, but one reviewer calls it blond, the other light brown. One gives no height, the other 6'1", the ad 6'. One says 150-160 lbs, the other 160-170 lbs. One says cock is 7-8", other 8-9". Add says $150/hr, one review says $200/hr; ad says $300/evening, review says $500/evening. I realize none of this shouts fake, but I still wonder why nothing agrees exactly. (The reason I looked him up was because he looked vaguely familiar to me, though I don't know why.)

Posted
This is the second review, both by first time reviewers, and what I find odd is the discrepancies in almost all the stats, not great differences, but still... In his ad, all the photos show someone with apparently dark hair, but one reviewer calls it blond, the other light brown. One gives no height, the other 6'1", the ad 6'. One says 150-160 lbs, the other 160-170 lbs. One says cock is 7-8", other 8-9". Add says $150/hr, one review says $200/hr; ad says $300/evening, review says $500/evening. I realize none of this shouts fake, but I still wonder why nothing agrees exactly. (The reason I looked him up was because he looked vaguely familiar to me, though I don't know why.)

 

Maybe one reviewers asshole is deeper than the others????

Maybe the guy was running a One Day Sale, like Macy's does often ?

Whats a 10 lb difference ? Maybe it was his time of month and he was bloated?

Whats and inch diff in height? - Maybe he was wearing heels that day ?

 

I'm just sayin ............

Posted

Just a few observations. The escort himself describes his hair as dark blond in the stat section of the ad. So the newest reviewer is just parrotting that information. Based on the photos my hair is a similar shade or slightly lighter. And I refer to it as light brown to brown. I've seen other people refer to it as dark blond.

 

The escort stats he is 160. So one reviewer describing it as 150-160lbs is really no different than the client describing it as 160-170lbs. The operative 160lbs is in each range.

 

The ad says $300 for 3 hours. The reviewer that said an evening appointment was $500 hired for longer than 3 hours ( I just read the review again it was an overnight). To me when I request an evening appointment with an escort I'm thinking more along the lines of 4 to 5 hours. "Evening" means something different to different people. One escort I know means 6 hours when he quotes an evening rate. The review that states an hour was $200 is from January 2010 perhaps Kolt has lowered his rates since 2010 in light of the current economy. The review from May 2010 sates $300 for an "Other" time period. So I see no problem with the difference in rates.

 

The differences in dick size happens a lot in reviews. The ad doesn't really state so there's no way to know for sure. But supposes it's 8 inches. The both the reviewer that states it's 7-8 inches and the reviewer that stats it's 8-9 inches are correct because it's 8 inches. As I recall, the review for doesn't allow for an exact measurement, it just gives the options of various ranges or it did the last time I submitted one.

 

And height is determined by clicking on heights from a drop down list, it's quite easy to click on 6'1" when you meant to click on 6'.

Posted
Just a few observations. The escort himself describes his hair as dark blond in the stat section of the ad. So the newest reviewer is just parrotting that information. Based on the photos my hair is a similar shade or slightly lighter. And I refer to it as light brown to brown. I've seen other people refer to it as dark blond.

 

The escort stats he is 160. So one reviewer describing it as 150-160lbs is really no different than the client describing it as 160-170lbs. The operative 160lbs is in each range.

 

The ad says $300 for 3 hours. The reviewer that said an evening appointment was $500 hired for longer than 3 hours ( I just read the review again it was an overnight). To me when I request an evening appointment with an escort I'm thinking more along the lines of 4 to 5 hours. "Evening" means something different to different people. One escort I know means 6 hours when he quotes an evening rate. The review that states an hour was $200 is from January 2010 perhaps Kolt has lowered his rates since 2010 in light of the current economy. The review from May 2010 sates $300 for an "Other" time period. So I see no problem with the difference in rates.

 

The differences in dick size happens a lot in reviews. The ad doesn't really state so there's no way to know for sure. But supposes it's 8 inches. The both the reviewer that states it's 7-8 inches and the reviewer that stats it's 8-9 inches are correct because it's 8 inches. As I recall, the review for doesn't allow for an exact measurement, it just gives the options of various ranges or it did the last time I submitted one.

 

And height is determined by clicking on heights from a drop down list, it's quite easy to click on 6'1" when you meant to click on 6'.

 

It's not 8" for sure...

Posted

If we're going to talk about data accuracy, the Kolt review discussed above is dated 8/22, and not 8/29 as per this original post's headline. :-)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...