Why ask for a thread to be closed?

[instudiocity]

Your post is not only rude, it does not make any sense.

 

Among other things, you contradicted yourself and you used a word (contenence) that does not fit with what you attempted to say.

 

Maybe he misspelled countenance for contenence? Because your countenance definitely has changed to a more aggressive posture. Had you looked up the word contenence you'd have discovered that he was saying you are sexually repressed.

 

You wrote - - ",who am I to judge? I do not."

 

Are you that dense? Your post is a judgment post. You judged me in your post.

Certainly you must sense judgment, because there isn't any button to click anywhere on the page to make it a JUDGEMENT POST! Which you would certainly have needed to check as well when stating repetitiously, "Your post is a judgment post. You judged me in your post. The ancient languages employed the same repetition but they didn't have exclamation marks!

 

Your response began with a judgment (although it contained an incorrect word that made your response senseless) yet it is clear that you don't understand that you made a judgment in your post.

 

Oops, that makes it double exclamation marks!!

 

As a matter of fact, your post makes about as much sense as the pathetic posts made by Ryan Cade. Maybe you two should meet and attempt to get a group discount on mental health treatments.

EXCUSE ME? How do two nuts meeting generate a group discount on anything? "Two nuts meet in the woods, a tree falls and out of no where appears a mental health provider and group therapy on a fallen log begins. KMEM and Ryan Cade remain because they've got 'wood' between their legs"?

 

I am really surprised that you chose to show such immaturity. In some of your prior posts that you made, you appeared to be reasonably normal. Obviously, that is no longer the case.

I'm not sure KMEM chose to show anything. But I do believe if he made prior posts, HE MADE THEM. But wait, I don't get the rest of that paragraph. KMEM shows immaturity, but he APPEARS to be reasonably normal. Did he choose to appear before while now he chooses to show immaturity? That must be why English has the word, childish but not the word ADULTISH!!!

 

AMEN![/size][/size][/u][/i][/b](emphasis added)

By the way, I do not know who Arthur is. Is that another signal of your pseudo intellect?-

Pseudointellect must be signaled while TRUE Intellect must be demonstrated.

Hurry and make an appointment with Ryan so that you two can find a good mental health worker - you both are on the edge.

I'm still trying to figure out how KMEM and Ryan Cade together make a mental health worker? Don't they need a third?

By the way, you failed to respond to the issues concerning your use of the wrong word and the contradiction in your prior post. You wrote that you do not judge but yet you did. Cat got your tongue?

What? He contradicted his prior post? Which one? I'm sorry but there is no antecedent assigned to the term 'prior post'. KMEM is a Count, he's got at least 2,651 posts. Do I need to read them all?

I am still puzzled why you have gone over the edge like you have recently. You formerly seemed okay in prior posts. Ever since Ryan started his bizarre posts, you seemed out of sorts and began making posts that were also bizarre.

I believe we might ask the same thing of you. But I shan't. When people are puzzled, leave them in pieces... that's my motto!

Maybe you and Ryan are the same people using a different screen name. You both compose some really strange postings similar to what one would expect from a high school drop out.

-

Methinks you shouldn't attempt to be the arbiter of what is proper English. Your posts in this thread seem to demonstrate the consequences of multiple servings of adult beverages. Now KMEM and Ryan are the same people? That mental health provider better have a specialty in multiple personality disorders. And Daddy is going to need to explain that last part. Daddy, how do people use the same screen name?

[OneFinger]

This sounds like a topic of discussion from the "other" M4M board that you seem to regularly (and more often) participate in. Give Lucky a kiss for me...

 

Lucky's not my type. You're on your own to pucker up and give him a kiss.

 

And, my participation on that site is about an infrequent as my postings here. You have a problem with people going to multiple sites? Do I now have a new cyber-stalker??

 

Get a fucking life!!!

[imrthr]

Maybe he misspelled countenance for contenence? Because your countenance definitely has changed to a more aggressive posture. Had you looked up the word contenence you'd have discovered that he was saying you are sexually repressed.

 

 

Certainly you must sense judgment, because there isn't any button to click anywhere on the page to make it a JUDGEMENT POST! Which you would certainly have needed to check as well when stating repetitiously, "Your post is a judgment post. You judged me in your post. The ancient languages employed the same repetition but they didn't have exclamation marks!

 

 

 

Oops, that makes it double exclamation marks!!

 

EXCUSE ME? How do two nuts meeting generate a group discount on anything? "Two nuts meet in the woods, a tree falls and out of no where appears a mental health provider and group therapy on a fallen log begins. KMEM and Ryan Cade remain because they've got 'wood' between their legs"?

 

 

I'm not sure KMEM chose to show anything. But I do believe if he made prior posts, HE MADE THEM. But wait, I don't get the rest of that paragraph. KMEM shows immaturity, but he APPEARS to be reasonably normal. Did he choose to appear before while now he chooses to show immaturity? That must be why English has the word, childish but not the word ADULTISH!!!

 

AMEN!(emphasis added)

Pseudointellect must be signaled while TRUE Intellect must be demonstrated.

I'm still trying to figure out how KMEM and Ryan Cade together make a mental health worker? Don't they need a third?

What? He contradicted his prior post? Which one? I'm sorry but there is no antecedent assigned to the term 'prior post'. KMEM is a Count, he's got at least 2,651 posts. Do I need to read them all?

I believe we might ask the same thing of you. But I shan't. When people are puzzled, leave them in pieces... that's my motto!

Methinks you shouldn't attempt to be the arbiter of what is proper English. Your posts in this thread seem to demonstrate the consequences of multiple servings of adult beverages. Now KMEM and Ryan are the same people? That mental health provider better have a specialty in multiple personality disorders. And Daddy is going to need to explain that last part. Daddy, how do people use the same screen name?

 

 

 

Based on what you just wrote and posted, it appears that you are another person who cannot or does not understand what you read.

 

I had no idea this forum attracted so many intellectually challenged individuals. Then again, it does not require intelligence to be a member of a public forum. It is more of a hit or miss situation.

 

Many people who post on this forum have more than one screen name. I do not understand why that concept is confusing to you. Oh, yes I do understand (you are dumb).

 

You and nitwit KMEM can console each other from this point on. It is a waste of my time and effort to attempt to communicate with you and nitwit, KMEM. It is obvious that you two cannot "connect the dots" so to speak.

 

Write or say what you want to this response. I will not respond again so you two nitwits can have the last words (as dumb as those last words will be).

 

In closing, I must say that you two freaks fit the classic example of what is commonly known as a total asshole, in the literary sense. In the factual sense, I suspect the same word applies.

-

[instudiocity]

imrthr=I'M Really, Totally, Handsomely, RIGHT!

[+ ArVaGuy]

Many people who post on this forum have more than one screen name. I do not understand why that concept is confusing to you. Oh, yes I do understand (you are dumb).-

 

On what fact do you base this assertion that "many" on this forum have multiple screen names? And why would anyone need such in the first place? However, it's clear that only a coward needs to hide behind multiple screen names if they seek to attack or disparage others. Individuals who create these multiple personas for this purpose are simply pathetic.

IMO it reveals a character flaw that obviously those who engage in such do not have the courage to stand up and state their convictions or opinions for fear of ridicule and/or revealing their true nature. Only the weak need to hide in such a manner. A real man will take on an issue or opponent directly.

So if you (or anyone else) are hiding behind a false identity your statements have no value because they are not supported by the courage of your convictions. What's it like to hide in such a closet?

[imrthr]

.

[+ deej]

As I said, I do not engage in multiple screen names

 

Yeah, you do.

[+ ArVaGuy]

Yep, no doubt about it, you are [deleted] under another screen name.

[imrthr]

 

Yeah, you do.

 

 

I do?

 

That is news to me.

 

I heard that you like to joke around but I don't see the humor in your joke.

 

-

[instudiocity]

I do?

 

That is news to me.

 

I heard that you like to joke around but I don't see the humor in your joke.

 

-

 

Ha ha. I love deej's sense of humor!!

 

imrthr aka mvan1. LOL!

 

Hey imrthr does that mean you've got a gay son posting here from your home? Maybe your BF is engaging less grammatically correct men in your absence? OR maybe it's just one of your multiple personalities? Hey, you could get a group discount from a mental health professional ALL BY YOURSELF! Ha ha!

[orbital sander]

Lucky's not my type. You're on your own to pucker up and give him a kiss.

 

And, my participation on that site is about an infrequent as my postings here. You have a problem with people going to multiple sites? Do I now have a new cyber-stalker??

 

Get a fucking life!!!

 

I treasure every post that you make here....

[MiamiLooker]

Simply because everything and more had been said? Otherwise, just to observe the social graces? Suggestions are NOT commandments.

 

Best regards,

KMEM

 

So, you don't know either?

[MiamiLooker]

I asked that the thread be closed because nothing worthwhile can come from further discussion. As a clinical psychologist I know whereof I speak. The continued discussion of this thread has only brought out the basest of emotions, and the entire issue is one that should, in my humble opinion, have been handled between the two individuals involved in a private and frank discussion. It was my suggestion to close the thread, and I first did that in a private message to the moderator and then in a public posting. As has been pointed out, I guess none of the terms of service have been violated. I have been a "lurker" here for years, and only recently have been posting and adding comments to posts when I thought that something I had to say might add to the value of the discussion. I see no reason to tear anyone down, be it a client or escort. I would certainly NEVER reveal private information about another person that could be construed to be inflamatory, derogratory, etc. That is best done on a one and one basis.

 

Handling conflict is one of the most difficult of all personal interactions. I have spent years helping individuals and groups handle conflict. Just as we all have different personalities, styles of communication and personal preferences, we have different ways of handling conflict. But, science has shown us that the best way of handling the most intense forms of conflict between two people is to handle it directly, privately, and with a large degree of tact and control.

 

This is the last post I will make on this subject, and I will not read any further posts on this subject, and I suggest others ignore future posts as well.

 

I respect your qualifications, however, I was a bit surprised that you looked at the thread (http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?75994-Unexpected-not-suprising-underhanded-cleverly-protected-by-a-well-crafted-persona) with such a limited perspective. There were numerous issues brought up and worthy of discussion. Subsequent posts have touched on many of them. You even made additional posts after asking others not to. So, I'll ask again: rather than asking that a thread be closed, why not allow it to just run it's course (it appears the one under discussion is winding down)?

[Diverdan]

Hey Miami Looker,

You are right... there were/are numerous issues that have been raised in these posts, but IMHO, they have all been peripheral to the basic thrust. Perhaps some good will come from all the rants, name calling, etc., but my original point still stands. When conflict exists it is best resolved between the people directly involved and not with a whole community who were not party to the interaction. Only two people know what really happened, and we have heard many others speculate on the motivations of these two guys and many others who have chimed in. In this case, the conflict was originally between two people and it would have been much better if had been left that way and resolved, if possible only between those two. I think all of these kinds of threads will wind down, and I hope that reputations are not ruined in the process. You are also right that I made additional posts after vowing that I would not, and in retrospect, I wish I had not made those additional posts. So, you see, I am not perfect either, but my wish is that we all will be able to move on and not let this ruin any one's life.

[instudiocity]

snip... snip...[/size][/font] ...but IMHO, they have all been peripheral to the basic thrust. Perhaps some good will come from all the rants, name calling, etc., but my original point still stands.

 

snip... snip...but my wish is that we all will be able to move on and not let this ruin any one's life.

 

I agree with Diverdan, we should all get back "to the basic thrust!"

[OneFinger]

Let me show you a secret.

 

Scroll all the way to the top of this page. (We'll wait.) Scroll all the way back down to the bottom and make a list of all the advertisements you see along the way.

 

Did you come up with the same number of advertisers as I did? I'll bet you did!

 

While there is no advertising in the forum, the link to this portion of Daddy's site is contained on the Daddy's M4M Reviews page. Since that DOES advertise, I made the assumption that clicks on the reviews and clicks in the Forum were combined for a total website count.

 

Are you saying that assumption is wrong and stats for the forum don't affect advertising revenue for the entire Daddy-related websites?

[OneFinger]

I treasure every post that you make here....

 

Yup, sounds like a cyber-stalker to me.

[instudiocity]

Just guessing at your question's answer, I'm sure Deej can give you the correct answer, but click-counts would apply to the page the ad is on. So there would only be one-click for folks going from Daddy's home page to the MC. Since they pay by the 1000 clicks, there couldn't be a whole heck of a lot of revenue from us demanding page after page of bitch-fest here.

 

A friend is on a horoscope website, he gets paid $30/1000 clicks. That's $0.03 per click. Fortunes are made in the 100's of 1000's of clicks per day.

[OneFinger]

Just guessing at your question's answer, I'm sure Deej can give you the correct answer, but click-counts would apply to the page the ad is on...

Great info!! Thanks so much for the clarification. Never have understood how people make money on website. But, apparently, it's not that much.

[instudiocity]

Great info!! Thanks so much for the clarification. Never have understood how people make money on website. But, apparently, it's not that much.

 

My horoscope guy? Get's about 300,000 clicks a month to share between himself and the produciton company. About 2 days a week of work for $4,500 a month ain't chicken feed. Now if for the same work, 1,000,000 clicks a month is more like $30K/month gross.

[+ deej]

Are you saying that assumption is wrong and stats for the forum don't affect advertising revenue for the entire Daddy-related websites?

 

Click-throughs generate income for websites when you click on a link or picture and land on a site that pays for the click-through. That is why some webmasters will post images that entice you to click to see the "full" thing on another site.

 

We don't do that.

[+ ArVaGuy]

Click-throughs generate income for websites when you click on a link or picture and land on a site that pays for the click-through. That is why some webmasters will post images that entice you to click to see the "full" thing on another site.

 

We don't do that.

 

 

Here's one user who very much appreciates that you guys don't use such tactics. While I'm sure there are plenty of ways to maximize revenue many of these ploys become an annoyance. I very seldom click through on any site to an advertising link. On a few rare cases when I did, usually accidentally, my virus program (Avast!) will sound warnings for various viruses or trojans.

 

Also there are some sites and message boards that get into what I view as conflicts of interest issues. There is a very popular board dedicated to the muscle fetish which will not allow agencies to post a notice about traveling guys unless they purchase a banner advertisement on the site. The moderators will delete the posts and send nasty warnings. Fine, I understand the business side of such but it borders on extortion with the heavy handed tactics.

[+ deej]

Here's one user who very much appreciates that you guys don't use such tactics. While I'm sure there are plenty of ways to maximize revenue many of these ploys become an annoyance. I very seldom click through on any site to an advertising link. On a few rare cases when I did, usually accidentally, my virus program (Avast!) will sound warnings for various viruses or trojans.

 

Well, there are other ways. Popups (or pop-unders) are rife in the porn world. They were wildly popular in the 90's and they became a primary attack vector for virus authors. As a response, sites that force a popup are not trusted by users because they are never any more trustworthy than the popups they generate (or the never-ending parade of other popups that may ensue).

 

God knows I've clicked the wrong thing and seen that never-ending parade of popups. I don't revisit the site. It's a very "last decade" way to generate revenue and destroy trust in a site.

 

We don't do popups either.