Why bother part 2

[Philly Guy]

I am curious.

 

I wonder how many of you would even bother to read Daddy's Reviews and Maleformale .... if all of the reviews were like the dreaded; He was beautiful, did not watch the clock, was fun to have dinner with, was a great conversationalist, but the details of our sexual encounter will remain between us.

 

My guess; even the prudes like the Professor would say: "What the fuck, where did all the creeps go? What am I going to do, take the escort's word for the fact that they prefer old, fat guys with small dicks and body odor with alcohol on their breath?

[Epigonos]

I NEVER hire an escort for a single hour. I always hire a guy for lunch or dinner and a couple of hours of play time. With that type of scenario I want reviews that tell about BOTH the escort’s personality and his sexual prowess. For the lunch gig I want to know if the guy is intelligent, interesting and can carry on a decent conversation. For the bedroom gig I want to know what he does in bed and how good he is at doing it. I would like both of these descriptive items provided in a review but if one has is to be weaker I would prefer that it be the former NOT the latter. If I read a review I want more than pretty photographs, a physical description of the escort and pretty compliments regarding his personality and intellect.

 

This discussion is, however, much like the one we have had in the past regarding our individual requirements regarding escort’s photographs. Many of us have different photo requirements so having different review requirements is much the same.

 

Hiring an escort is such a personal thing that it is almost impossible to make a lot of generalizations regarding what we “all” want to read in a review.

[Bart]

Philly

I understand your point about the reviews, but I think you are being a little hard on some of the reviewers. At least we have some information to go on.

 

I love long detailed reviews with lots of sex. That is how I write my reviews and I have written over 30 of them. Not one was stingy on details. It is my oportunity to write porn and I love it.

 

However, those reviews took me an hour to write. Most of my meetings are 3 hours or longer.

 

If you see an escort for an hour how long should it take to write a reviews 10 minutes. Some people are not going to do more than that so lets at least get the basics covered. He was great with communications, the fee, pictures matched I listed the activties he does and we did them all. Okay I can take that.

 

Believe it or not, I have seen reviewers taken to task in the forum for writing on and on and they just want the facts. There are also escorts who do not want details written. I have met 3 of them. I had great meetings with them. They asked that if I write a review mention nothing of the sex. They were worried it would be held against them in two of the cases and the other one just does not want it made public what he does.

[ariadne1880]

Hey where are the "thread police?" You know the people who chime in and say "how come you started another thread on the same topic when one already exists?" You know who you are.

 

There is no doubt that the very first post in the original thread is what set some us -- and certainly me -- off. It was unwarranted. It takes time and effort to write a review. It takes time and effort to just think about writing the review. It took me a couple of weeks to really think about what I wanted to say. Then I sat down and composed what I thought was a thoughtful review that reflected my experience. Many, many people don't even bother to write reviews. I felt good about what I had written.

 

Then to have this "Bob" person who -- to the best of my knowledge -- has never written a review (although) that doesn't matter come along and tell me that what I had taken the time and effort to write was "worthless" and then have the usual suspects chime in and be even more insulting ... well, to be quite frank, it really PISSED ME OFF.

 

So, I apologize if I went over the top in some of my responses but under the circumstances I wonder who wouldn't have done the same.

 

Mark

[pierrot]

I guess different people have different criteria. However for me, I couldn't care less whether the escort can discuss Proust or likes pork chops or is a "gentleman".

I hire an escort for good sex, not friendship. Of course I want him to be pleasant and easy to get along with. If he's an axe murderer, I need to know it.

But it's a description of him and what he does in the sack that is the real info I need to find out from a review. Is he versatile, well-hung, open to oral, anal, other things, etc? Does he look like his photos? Handsome, old, young, etc.

It seems disingenuous for the "prudes" to think this sort of description is out of place in a review. I mean we're sitting here reading a web site about male prostitutes for God's sake, if you're prudish you're in the wrong place.

The reviews that keep the details for themselves are useless to me. I can't see why the reviewers bother to write at all beyond some need to share their rather pathetic crush on some guy they paid $250 an hour to have dinner with them.

[Bob]

I never realized my original post would release such a firestorm, but it made for some interesting reading. It's always fascinating to observe how people are put together, especially the wiring in the brain. Ours all work differently. Even something so unimportant as how to write a review brings out such divergent thoughts. Some folks seem to enjoy being coy. They are a little bit like the child with the new toy parading around the school yard but refusing to share. I did appreciate the poster who referred to me as a bully. It made my day. Casper Milquetoast here. But I'm striving to improve. Pierrot seems to have put it all in proper perspective.

[ariadne1880]

Well, I guess that's what makes you an "asshole" then to use philly guys word. What makes you an asshole is your need to insult someone who takes the time to write a review. If the review isn't to your liking, then don't read it, or move on. Don't go public with your whining and gripes.

 

And it's sad day when not sharing every intimate sexual detail is considered "prudish."

 

If you want to find out what sex is like with a particular guy then go have sex with them yourself. What makes you think that a review about sex will mirror the experience you might have? That's what is called "living vicariously" through someone else's experience.

 

A review should be about the experience the reviewer had and whether or not the escort met the reviewers expectations. It shouldn't be about answering every single question a potential reader of the review might have. If you couldn't get a sense of my experience from my review then either you are incapable of reading with comprehension or you are a complete idiot.

 

Telling a reviewer how he has to write his review in order to satisfy you is just about the most arrogant thing I have ever heard.

 

Mark

[JT Brooklyn]

I never understood why some "Working Guys" though FEW..

go out of their way for OVER THE TOP REVIEWS? They know who they are by the Over The Top AMOUNT they have recieved! IF that wasn't the case, we would have alot more guys getting more than 2-3 Reviews a Year!

 

Then when they get an "Honest" This was my experience with...from a First Time or WHOEVER guy..They have the "cujones" to say.. well just read the Good Ones and ignore the so-so ones! LOL

 

EVERY ENCOUNTER IS DIFFERENT! The Review GUARANTEES VERY LITTLE!

 

My Opinion of the "Review" Section has always been: It's a Listing of WHO is Working IT. not HOW they are Working IT!

;-)

[Philly Guy]

>I guess different people have different criteria. However for

>me, I couldn't care less whether the escort can discuss Proust

>or likes pork chops or is a "gentleman".

>I hire an escort for good sex, not friendship. Of course I

>want him to be pleasant and easy to get along with. If he's an

>axe murderer, I need to know it.

>But it's a description of him and what he does in the sack

>that is the real info I need to find out from a review. Is he

>versatile, well-hung, open to oral, anal, other things, etc?

>Does he look like his photos? Handsome, old, young, etc.

>It seems disingenuous for the "prudes" to think this

>sort of description is out of place in a review. I mean we're

>sitting here reading a web site about male prostitutes for

>God's sake, if you're prudish you're in the wrong place.

>The reviews that keep the details for themselves are useless

>to me. I can't see why the reviewers bother to write at all

>beyond some need to share their rather pathetic crush on some

>guy they paid $250 an hour to have dinner with them.

 

That, My Friend, sums my thought up exactly. At $300 an hour, I for one, cannot afford to make a mistake. I usually test the waters for an hour and then subsequently hire for longer.

 

Based in their reviews I hired Benjamin N for an overnight and hired Ryan in Phoenix and Brandan Steele for full day appointments. I would never have done that if I had not seen several quality reviews that could solidify my judgement.

[rvwnsd]

In his rebuttal to a scathing review, an escort named Vincent made the following comment:

 

"...I do not promise that I will do everything I do with a particular individual with someone else..."

 

That sums up the relative value of a review. What occurs between escort "A" and client "1" might be very different from that which occurs between escort "A" and client "2." While I agree that the escort's preference for pork chops over chicken breast doesn't really matter to me when determining whether there is a sexual match, there are guys who hire escorts for companionship and for those guys the non-sexual qualities are likely very important. On the other hand, if I am trying to figure out whether a guy will show up and be clean, sober, coherent, etc, a review that focuses solely on his sexual performance will not help me.

 

If you are curious about what an escort will or will not do with you, then ask him. Yes, there are guys who don't like to discuss sex or won't do so on the first conversation. If you aren't certain whether a guy will discuss your preferences in advance, then the reviews that detail the pre-encounter conversations/e-mail exchanges will provide you with this information. I recognize that this requires a little work, but nothing worthwhile occurs without expending some effort.

[Guest CURIOUS35]

A review is a critical evaluation of a text, event, object, or phenomenon. Reviews can consider books, articles, entire genres or fields of literature, architecture, art, fashion, restaurants, policies, exhibitions, performances, and many other formse.g. this blog.

 

A review makes an statement... an argument. The most important element of a review is that it is an exposition, perhaps a summary of the encounter. it is a dialogue and discussion with the work's creator as he narrates it for his audiences.

 

You as a reader, can offer agreement or disagreement and identify where you find the work exemplary or deficient in its knowledge, judgments, or organization. You should clearly state your opinion of the review in question, The only caveat is be aware of the intent of the reviewer! People who post here have their individual styles...some are sexually graphic...some are coy and prudish... some may be wanting in style..others may be aprose revelation worthy of a NYTimes Best Smut seller list! ONE MUST choose the reviews he reads based on the author or perhaps the style.

 

Typically, reviews are brief. In newspapers and academic journals, they rarely exceed 1000 words, although the encounter may be lengthier. Reviews in this blog vary in tone, subject, and style, although they share common features jumping board -- an encounter with an escort!

 

Judging on the various post si Have read in this blog. the reviews can be a concise summary of the encounter. This includes a relevant description of the escort as well as the place of tryst. I fill in the blanks of the revelation by reading the requisite info on the model/escort. the bullet answers are very revealing. What can be said in a paragraph is actually there in a word or two. Much like a successful resume-- short but powerful! :_

 

Second, and more importantly, a review offers a critical assessment of the feelings of the reviewer This involves his reactions to the escort under review: what strikes you or not is dependent on what you are looking for. Some reviewers are not XXX rated description laden reviewer and some are. Some reviewers will tease you of their encounter -- I, for one, would e-mail the reviewer and ask for clarifications. ( out of 10 I get a first hand detail of what happens -- see, some reviewers are ecstatic just making the review. They write the review as the see fit (if they are happy--- THEY ARE HAPPY!) and the forget the details. Much less like a bride doing all the preparations of the wedding andbeing too tired for sex in the evening!

 

 

I also read the description of the author...It is a revelation to me in many ways. I look at the escorts pictures , his summary of wndowments and skills and I read in between the lines.

 

One thing I would never do though is to explicitly shut down someone, who just wants to share his happiness. true the site is about escorts; but it is also about US!

 

I am not posting this to prolong an already agonizing thred (s)...I decided to post it to clarify where many people stand! And everyone is entitled to their own opinion!

[Epigonos]

CURIOUS35 makes an extremely cogent point. Whenever I read a review in which I find the escort appealing I ALWAYS read with great interest the reviewers self description. If the writer describes himself as 30 years old, gym built, 6’ tall, weighing 185 lbs., good looking and having a nine inch cock I know the review isn’t terribly relevant for me as I possess only two of those attributes. I am always most impressed by positive reviews written by guys about MY AGE who have similar stats. I am 67 years old and I want to know how well the escort plays with clients my age. I just happen to be 6’ tall and weigh 185 lbs. but if I weighted 300 lbs. I’d want to know how the escorted related to heavy clients. Therefore, for me the description of the client in as important as the description of the escort.

[Guest CURIOUS35]

>CURIOUS35 makes an extremely cogent point. Whenever I read a

>review in which I find the escort appealing I ALWAYS read with

>great interest the reviewers self description. If the writer

>describes himself as 30 years old, gym built, 6’ tall,

>weighing 185 lbs., good looking and having a nine inch cock I

>know the review isn’t terribly relevant for me as I possess

>only two of those attributes. I am always most impressed by

>positive reviews written by guys about MY AGE who have similar

>stats. I am 67 years old and I want to know how well the

>escort plays with clients my age. I just happen to be 6’ tall

>and weigh 185 lbs. but if I weighted 300 lbs. I’d want to know

>how the escorted related to heavy clients. Therefore, for me

>the description of the client in as important as the

>description of the escort.

 

 

:-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

 

Thank you! I know I am not alone in my ways! Somewhere...somehow.. someone will tie his shoe the way I do : I do not untie them at all, ergo I don't tie my shoe!

 

 

:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

[D.A.C.]

Damn boy, your'e a whiney old queen...ain't ya.

No wonder you have too pay for dick...who the hell would want to be around you without being paid...jeeesshhh

[Guest zipperzone]

>Damn boy, your'e a whiney old queen...ain't ya.

>No wonder you have too pay for dick...who the hell would want

>to be around you without being paid...jeeesshhh

 

Right on! You've hit the nail on the head.

[Lookin]

. . . take the escort's word for the fact that they prefer old, fat guys with small dicks and body odor with alcohol on their breath . . .

 

Such an angel exists?? I’d nearly given up hope!

 

 

But seriously folks, my view is that each review is a gift. Someone has taken the time to offer something he felt might be useful to someone else. If it helps me, I’m grateful. If it doesn’t, I can let it stay there for the next person. Unless it’s deliberately misleading, no harm done.

 

The one review I wrote is full of juicy detail, and I like those best. But that’s partly selfish too, because I loved writing it, and love reading them. When I read a review from someone who wants to keep the details between him and the escort, that suggests to me that the client is somewhat more romantic than sexual. And that tells me something about the client as well as the escort who gave him what he was looking for.

 

With luck, an escort I’m interested in will have a review or two. And more is better. I don’t see the benefit from discouraging any reviewers at all.

[TruYun]

> then ask him.

 

 

And hope you are getting an honest answer. It is amazing what an escort will agree over the phone and not deliver in person. The same goes for what a review says an escort did then but does badly or not at all now. I do not refer to far out kinks. The fact is that every meeting with an escort is a gamble.