Frustration

[Louis]

I find this sort of thing very frustrating. Lynden appears to be a great escort, but I have no idea what he does. His profile mentions versatile. All I know from the review is that he looks good....then we have this......

 

The rest I perfer to leave between him and me. He is perfect at reading signals and fulfilled my every desire with class and distinction. If you want the best call Lynden.

 

Like give me a break...

Loouis

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Since the dawn of this site it's a regular thing for people to bitch about the quality of reviews. Some people prefer writing reviews that rival Penthouse Forum and then there are some who simply want to give a public 'thanks' and keep the details one-on-one.

 

I'd recommend simply sending this escort an email. Ask him directly what his works his mojo and then decide if he's your stud-puppet

 

 

BN

[Louis]

The same thing happens on the Canadian Male reviews too. Im not trying to bitch as much as trying to show how useless that sort of thing is.

I like reading reviews, provided they had enough substance to make a person read the review want to hire that particular escort. Long reviews are not neccessary. But just a few words, like...."he's a great top".. "he's a great bottom".. or "he is very versatile'.. three to four words, says it all without getting into the nitty gritty.

I belong to several railway Yahoo groups, and the people who run those groups give guidlines as to how to make submissions, whether it be reports on what hey have seen or pictures they have taken.

Maybe there should be a reviewer's guidlines section or area, that reviewers have to read before making a review. I am sure that if these shy people were asked to use words like top, bottom or versatile, that they may use them.

Don't get me wrong I appreciate all the hard work that goes into running a site. I know what kind of work is involed, and you do a great job....so I don't want to sound critical and sound like I don't appreciate what you are doing...to the contrary, your hard work is appreciated.....:-)

Louis

[+ deej]

>Maybe there should be a reviewer's guidlines section or area,

 

Nobody reads what's there now. What makes you think they'd read MORE? LOL

 

>that reviewers have to read before making a review. I am sure

>that if these shy people were asked to use words like top,

>bottom or versatile, that they may use them.

 

Well, technically they are asked. There's a space in the review form itself where reviewers are asked to choose. In the very review you're talking about, that choice is indeed filled in.

 

>Don't get me wrong I appreciate all the hard work that goes

>into running a site. I know what kind of work is involed, and

>you do a great job....

 

Ben often THINKS he runs this site, but that is not the case. }(

 

I agree that "between us" reviews are frustrating but they are still important data points. They tell you the escort has worked recently and that the client was (or wasn't) happy with the experience. And this review actually DOES answer the specific question you had about it.

[buckguy]

He apparently did a bukkake video for "Crusingforsex.com" this past weekend, maybe that's a start toward answering your question.

[Guest zipperzone]

>The same thing happens on the Canadian Male reviews too.

 

???? Canadian Male reviews? Is there a site I'm not aware of?

[seeker630]

>

>I agree that "between us" reviews are frustrating but they are

>still important data points. They tell you the escort has

>worked recently and that the client was (or wasn't) happy with

>the experience. And this review actually DOES answer the

>specific question you had about it.

 

Ok - he talks, he kisses, he undresses. That's what he does?

 

What's ambiguous to me is that the Role information (top, bottom,versatile) is, according to the guidelines, supposed to be based on what the escort *advertises - and not necessarily what he delivers. Sometimes the informaiton about the client himself can help out - if the client had a fantastic time and describes himself as a bottom...we can make some assumptions about what the escort does. But if someone says 'I had a great time' and you have no idea what he *likes...the take-away informaiton is pretty limited.

 

Kinf of like a an anonymous restaurant review that says - I enjoyed my dinner' at the pan-Asian restautant on Main St. Ok, there's an Asian restuarant & someone liked it.

 

Sorry - I share the frustration (obviously).

[Louis]

Go to this web site. It has quite a few Canadian escorts listed. Over twenty pages.

It also has a review section.

http://www.thegaymalebody.com/go/adult/01014/Escort%20Agency/1/rating/

Louis

[Guest zipperzone]

>Go to this web site. It has quite a few Canadian escorts

>listed. Over twenty pages.

>It also has a review section.

>http://www.thegaymalebody.com/go/adult/01014/Escort%20Agency/1/rating/

>Louis

 

Thank You..........

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Ah, nothing sexier than a guy who's face looks like a glazed doughnut...

 

BN

[Funseeker 22]

>Ah, nothing sexier than a guy who's face looks like a glazed

>doughnut...

>

>BN

 

Ouch. Kitty has claws...

>>

>> Be nice now. Don't make me spank you.

 

This comment sound familiar ?. wink*

>>

:)