Cached Reviews from M4M

[Boston Guy]

For those who are looking for reviews but can't remember the name of the escort they are interested in, try this:

 

Google this combination: male4malescorts.com reviews

 

Note that there is a space before "review". As of right now, this search will return 553 cached review pages. You can access any one of them by clicking on "cached" at the bottom of each listing.

 

However, these cached pages will likely become stale and disappear soon. Anyone who wants to save this material should consider loading the html pages they want and saving them to their own computer.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

For those who are looking for reviews but can't remember the name of the escort they are interested in, try this:

 

Google this combination: male4malescorts.com reviews

 

Note that there is a space before "review". As of right now, this search will return 553 cached review pages. You can access any one of them by clicking on "cached" at the bottom of each listing.

 

However, these cached pages will likely become stale and disappear soon. Anyone who wants to save this material should consider loading the html pages they want and saving them to their own computer.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

I thought I could generate links to the cached escort index pages (i.e, the ones that listed escorts by state). If those were available, they'd contain links to each escort that could then be used as Google search terms, allowing pretty much any escort to be located.

 

Unfortunately, those pages were loaded in frames and I haven't yet found the correct links. The frame pages themselves are not valid in the cache.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

I thought I could generate links to the cached escort index pages (i.e, the ones that listed escorts by state). If those were available, they'd contain links to each escort that could then be used as Google search terms, allowing pretty much any escort to be located.

 

Unfortunately, those pages were loaded in frames and I haven't yet found the correct links. The frame pages themselves are not valid in the cache.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

Searching Google Images with the term male4malescorts brings up a few dozen cached images. Ironically -- and appropriately, I think -- HB's avatar was the first one listed for me.

 

BG

[+ deej]

The only thing that worries me about hitting the Google cache is that enough activity may trigger their spiders, which will then discover the page no longer exists and MAY dump the cache AND the "live" search results stored in their database.

 

It's an interesting experiment, though.

[Boston Guy]

Yeah, well, the cache is going to get dumped sooner or later. But I have no idea when sooner or later will actually come. Conventional wisdom suggests the Google keeps cached pages longer than many webmasters would prefer.

 

BG

[+ deej]

LOL! Yeah, but fortunately it's working in our favor FOR NOW.

 

I just hope it continues to hold! It doesn't have to last for long, but I sure hope we don't experience the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: observing an experiment alters the outcome of that experiment.

 

VEOH was popular until people started talking about it (and driving traffic). I'd hate to see something similar happen with the Google cache just because we're sending traffic there.

[Guest n2colour]

I tried checking the wayback machine (http://www.archive.org/web/web.php) but it is now reporting that it is "blocked by the site owner via robots.txt." It wasn't a week ago, when I went looking for something that has long since been removed.

[IceFireWizard]

There are two good ways of recovering old (defunct) web pages, to the extent they have not been blocked for webcrawler (robot) access.

 

1. Go to http://www.google.com and search for the URL you want but look only in "cached" form.

 

2. Go to http://www.archive.org and search for the URL you want in their "time machine".

 

In #1, the cached version may be deleted the next time the robot visits that URL, so #1 is not a true archive. #2 is a true archive, if the robot can enter. Unfortunately, the access to the M4M site has been blocked and the archive is not available.

[IceFireWizard]

The algorithm that decides when the google webcrawler will visit again

is a trade secret. Somewhat surprisingly, sites that are updated too frequently will cause the robot NOT to waste its time dumping a new image into cache.

 

On the other hand, what the robot will do with a defunct site whose cache is attracting lots of activity is not so clear.

 

So, yes, for all practical purposes there is a Heisenberg uncertainty here vis a vis the google robot algorithm.

[+ deej]

>Unfortunately, the

>access to the M4M site has been blocked and the archive is not

>available.

 

Several times over the years, escorts have presented completely legitimate reasons for taking review pages down NOW. Not being archived is helpful, useful even, in those cases.

 

archive.org and the Google cache are a gold mine for law enforcement (and stalkers). :-(

[IceFireWizard]

It looks like Google is already starting to dump the cache on some pages. It would be wise to save any reviews you wish to keep (if you haven't done so already) on your machine until daddysreviews.com goes on-line.

 

IFW