John "Roughscort" Orlando

[Quincy]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

>Maybe. But I just started a few months ago.

 

And you're already obsessing and fretting about the review process. Why don't you get some more experience and just try to have some fun? Then you will have less questions and concerns about writing reviews, like those of us who've been hiring for years.

[IceFireWizard]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

>Maybe. But I just started a few months ago.

 

I've read your postings from the very first one. Hiring is about having a good time. You're missing something...

[KY_TOP]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

>

>I agree but I don't think that's what TNT was saying. I think

>he thinks that a "no chemistry" review is somehow going to

>help him. But I don't see how it would help me to know that a

>certain escort didn't click with someone else.

 

But if people wrote "no Chemistry" reviews would it then make a difference if the Escort hadn't "clicked" with several clients?

[Mouth]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

Clearly I've hit a nerve here. As someone who has hired frequently, and written about my experience in great detail on this site, I've more than learned a few things. I wrote a negative review (my only negative review, by the way) about an escort experience in which we had zero chemistry. I was shocked, and later after I posted the review, I regretted it. Now the ony way I would post a negative review would be if someone had blatantly ripped me off, or made me feel afraid of him, etc. I've hired more than my fair share of less than stellar escorts, but to be fair, they mostly delivered what they promised and in most cases had good reviews. There is a very popular escort with many great reviews here whom I hired and had a terrific time with. He later e-mailed me requesting that I write a review and then suggested things I might write about our session. I was appalled, and wrote back saying I wasn't used to having escorts dictate how I might review them and told him to buzz off. He got the message and I never heard from him again, nor did I write a review. This was a pity, as we really did have a a lot of fun. I've even written excellent reviews of escorts I didn't have any expectations of hiring again. They deserved their good notices. I post fewer reviews than in the past but I don't regret the good reviews I have submitted. I'm just being more selective.

 

But I'm asking people to really look at the content of this latest review of John "Roughscort." It was really nasty and agenda-driven--as though he really wanted to hurt John's business. I've seen escorts write defenses of bad reviews in which they were brutally criticized over for being too angry or too arrogant. And in many of these cases, I understood the escort had gone too far. So why isn't it a two-way street. This reviewer was really personal in his attack. Nearly every review has praised Roughscort for his good physical conditioning, and his topping skills. Why suddenly after so many good notices, is he out of shape, looking old, reeking of pot, etc. Doesn't add up. If John did reply (which I doubt he will--he hasn't so far), he'd probably be criticized for that as well. Roughscort doesn't strike me as a scam artist that someone like, say, Cole Ramsay, is. That guy has a huge number of reviews that are less than flattering and many are that are downright hostile (but does that stop fools from hiring him???).

[Guest TNT Ted]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

"And you're already obsessing and fretting about the review process."

 

Help me understand, Quincy, why you think I'm obsessing about the review process. The escort review section is the primary purpose of this web site, is it not? And since I use the review section almost exclusively to help with my hiring, I think it's only fair that I contribute to it as well. Which means I will not only write reviews, but will do what little I can to encourage more balanced and fair reviews.

 

 

"Why don't you get some more experience and just try to have some fun?"

 

Are you saying that inexperienced guys don't have any fun? Not likely!

 

 

"Then you will have less questions and concerns about writing reviews, like those of us who've been hiring for years."

 

And, I assume that for all those years, especially for the times you've used this web site, you've done your fair share by contributing objective reviews. Am I correct?

[Quincy]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

>And, I assume that for all those years, especially for the

>times you've used this web site, you've done your fair share

>by contributing objective reviews.

 

Similar to what Mouth said below, I would only write a negative review if the escort stole my money, threatened me, couldn't get hard, or was unprofessional in any way. If the guy was hard, came for me (I request that in advance), was friendly, on-time, didn't watch the clock, and if I got off and didn't feel rushed, then I see no value in posting a negative review. If I didn't see fireworks or connect on some deeper level, then why nitpick over every minor detail and hurt someone's business for my personal satisfaction or the sake of being "fair and balanced"?

[Guest TNT Ted]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

Well, now you're putting words in my mouth. Who was nitpicking over details? Or worse, who said anything about experiencing fireworks or connecting on a deeper level? And worse yet, who want's to hurt a guy's business?

 

If I got everything you listed as being important, I'd be in hog heaven. What negative thing COULD you write? But that begs the question: When you don't get everything on your list, do you write a negative review? And I'm not talking stealing your money -- that's a pretty obvious one -- but what if, say, you didn't think he was friendly?

 

And finally, where are your reviews? I'd like to read some.

[KY_TOP]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

>Clearly I've hit a nerve here.

 

Why does expressing one's opinion mean you've hit a nerve?

 

>As someone who has hired

>frequently, and written about my experience in great detail on

>this site, I've more than learned a few things. I wrote a

>negative review (my only negative review, by the way) about an

>escort experience in which we had zero chemistry. I was

>shocked, and later after I posted the review, I regretted it.

 

What occurred or made you regret it?

 

>Now the ony way I would post a negative review would be if

>someone had blatantly ripped me off, or made me feel afraid of

>him, etc. I've hired more than my fair share of less than

>stellar escorts, but to be fair, they mostly delivered what

>they promised and in most cases had good reviews.

 

If they delivered what they promised, why did you consider them less than stellar?

 

> There is a

>very popular escort with many great reviews here whom I hired

>and had a terrific time with. He later e-mailed me requesting

>that I write a review and then suggested things I might write

>about our session.

 

This has also happened to me and I've had escorts ask if they could edit a review before I submitted. I never told them to buzz off but just wrote what i had intended in the first place. I even had an escort ask me to write a review and then I pointed out to him I had and if he read his reviews he would see it had already posted. Got a good laugh from that one.

 

> I was appalled, and wrote back saying I

>wasn't used to having escorts dictate how I might review them

>and told him to buzz off. He got the message and I never

>heard from him again, nor did I write a review. This was a

>pity, as we really did have a a lot of fun. I've even written

>excellent reviews of escorts I didn't have any expectations of

>hiring again. They deserved their good notices. I post

>fewer reviews than in the past but I don't regret the good

>reviews I have submitted. I'm just being more selective.

 

Why more selective in writing reviews?

 

>

>But I'm asking people to really look at the content of this

>latest review of John "Roughscort." It was really nasty and

>agenda-driven--as though he really wanted to hurt John's

>business.

 

Have you met John "Roughscort" to verify that the reviewer is incorrect in his comments?

 

> I've seen escorts write defenses of bad reviews in

>which they were brutally criticized over for being too angry

>or too arrogant. And in many of these cases, I understood the

>escort had gone too far. So why isn't it a two-way street.

 

It is, that is why the escort gets to respond and have the last word.

 

>This reviewer was really personal in his attack. Nearly every

>review has praised Roughscort for his good physical

>conditioning, and his topping skills. Why suddenly after so

>many good notices, is he out of shape, looking old, reeking of

>pot, etc. Doesn't add up.

 

What if some of those glowing reviews by first time reviewers are fake reviews?

 

> If John did reply (which I doubt

>he will--he hasn't so far), he'd probably be criticized for

>that as well. Roughscort doesn't strike me as a scam artist

>that someone like, say, Cole Ramsay, is. That guy has a huge

>number of reviews that are less than flattering and many are

>that are downright hostile (but does that stop fools from

>hiring him???).

 

I hope he does respond, politely, honestly and with class.

[Quincy]

RE: John "Roughscort" Orlando

 

I met a few who had a bit of an attitude but that alone wasn't worthy of a negative review. I look at the total picture, I don't keep a list as you put it.

 

My reviewer name is different from my posting name.