NO Show Escort Posting

[UncleNYC]

this was not a pre-paid session...but, I thought I'd seen a previous no show report on this escort...took a chance... and he was a no show...want to post it..can't figure out how...

[Steven_Draker]

Please, could you translate that, UncleNYC :+ :*

[whipped guy]

Unc... I need no translation. I understand exactly where you are coming from. If you check the FAQ page you will see the following:

 

I made a date with an escort and he never showed up. How do I let people know he is unreliable?

 

With the following response:

 

We’re currently “Holding” all “No Shows” reviews until we determine the final policy. The previous policy was not consistent and difficult to verify and enforce.

[Steven_Draker]

Appreciated your private message, Uncle.

See you next time in NYC.

 

Steven Draker ~

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/steven_draker_brussels.html

[UncleNYC]

thanks..the escort was Damon Phoenix

[Barry]

>We’re currently “Holding” all “No Shows” reviews until we

>determine the final policy. The previous policy was not

>consistent and difficult to verify and enforce.

 

Personally I don't understand that. No Shows shouldn't be any more difficult to "verify" than any other negative review. In fact, if the arrangements were made and confirmed by email, verification would be easier than "he didn't get hard".

 

Barry

[JamesK840]

>We’re currently “Holding” all “No Shows” reviews until we

>determine the final policy. The previous policy was not

>consistent and difficult to verify and enforce.

 

I'm pretty sure it's still inconsistent because I could swear I've seen reviews that were just no-shows recently.

[Steven_Draker]

I think the original poster meant that a no-show review won't be published unless it was pre-paid.

 

Steven Draker ~

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/steven_draker_brussels.html

[+ deej]

>>We’re currently “Holding” all “No Shows” reviews until

>we

>>determine the final policy. The previous policy was not

>>consistent and difficult to verify and enforce.

>

>I'm pretty sure it's still inconsistent because I could swear

>I've seen reviews that were just no-shows recently.

 

Yep. Bottom line seems to be to go ahead and submit the review.

 

Worst case scenario it will end up in limbo, but isn't that pretty much the same for any review submitted? <shrug>

[+ deej]

>>We’re currently “Holding” all “No Shows” reviews until

>we

>>determine the final policy. The previous policy was not

>>consistent and difficult to verify and enforce.

>

>I'm pretty sure it's still inconsistent because I could swear

>I've seen reviews that were just no-shows recently.

 

Yep. Bottom line seems to be to go ahead and submit the review.

 

Worst case scenario it will end up in limbo, but isn't that pretty much the same for any review submitted? <shrug>

[Barry]

Yes, you're right but that's the new "rule" about no-shows that I don't understand. The review must have some proof of money lost by the client. Copy of a plane ticket or money order or Pay Pal transaction. No other type of review has that minimum standard of proof required to be published and that's what I don't understand.

 

Barry

[Guest 8mile]

I understand this policy. It could be quite possible that an escort calls his client maybe 1 hour before set time for an appointment and cancels. If it's a pretty late appointment say 11 o'clock it's already too late to contact another escort, in conclusion...he doesn't get laid. As revenge, or maybe he feels justified, he sends in a "no show" review, which he can show proof that an appointment had been set up, however it would be quite hard for an escort to counter with I called "left a message" or "spoke to you personally." So to lean to the side of the escort deserves golf claps in my opinion.

 

 

As Usual

Zachary