Minimally active escorts

[vikingguy]

I'm following up on a discussion I recently had with an escort and a few friends of mine.

 

I'm amazed at how many escorts are out there who aren't very "active" with their clients. I can understand everyone has limits to what they do ... and should be respected for that.

 

So what do you guys think of escorts who don't kiss, won't perform oral, won't bottom, and prefer that you jerk yourself off? This is the description of a new guy in Philly. All he's willing to do is be a top with not a whole lot of other physical contact.

[Guest HonkingGoose]

>I'm following up on a discussion I recently had with an

>escort and a few friends of mine.

>

>I'm amazed at how many escorts are out there who aren't very

>"active" with their clients. I can understand everyone has

>limits to what they do ... and should be respected for that.

>

>So what do you guys think of escorts who don't kiss, won't

>perform oral, won't bottom, and prefer that you jerk yourself

>off? This is the description of a new guy in Philly. All

>he's willing to do is be a top with not a whole lot of other

>physical contact.

>

>

I think (know) I wouldn't hire him.

[JT Brooklyn]

Honk...LOL.. EXACTLY! That's why a Review Good-Bad or Sometimes Ugly, is definitely a Plus to those who read them.

 

"IF for No Other Reason" than to Remind a guy, To Always Ask Upfront what will and Probably will not happen, during a Hookup!

 

There's a Hunk visiting NYC soon, BUT Apparently, he has Trouble answering very Basic Questions? So my Spring Short List, just got a little shorter! LOL

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Escorts who don't perform like escorts should probably find another line of work. Telemarketing perhaps...

 

Bluntly: If you don't enjoy sex or things of a sexual nature in a versatile, variety of ways, then DON'T become an escort. I've had this discussion with several of my guys who have, at times, told me what other escorts they see will 'do' and the usual much longer list of what they 'won't do.'

 

Why the hell would i want to suck someone's dick if they insist on wearing a condom while doing so? What's with a 'touch, but don't taste' policy? Who wants to spend 100% of their hard-earned money on a 40% soft-serve service? Not me.

 

Yes, longterm appointments involve much more than just the physical side of things, but ultimately it all comes down to being able to be flexible and pleasing on an intimate level. It can't be robotic, rehearsed sex. It's got to be real. If it's not, people will eventually realize it and see that the connection (sexual or otherwise) just isn't there. There goes a repeat meeting.

 

Being a good escort, if not a great escort, isn't easy. There are far too many guys doing this who treat it as a means to quick cash without ever knowing or caring about the people they see. If an escort only thinks 'cash is king' then they seriously have a screwed up monarchy on their hands...

 

 

~BN

[DelawareGuy]

Would this be the guy that just showed up on RentBoy and was formerly with a well known Philly agency?

[Chuck50]

How do you say gay for pay??? Well probably cant even say that as most of them do more. HUGS Chuck

[Guest ncm2169]

< Bluntly: If you don't enjoy sex or things of a sexual nature in a versatile, variety of ways, then DON'T become an escort.

 

Bluntly, you're flat wrong. I'm a close friend of an escort who I introduced to "The Biz" who is bi-curious and very limited in his interaction. I was apprehensive about how many clients he'd attract, but he was an immediate hit and continues to get many requests for his time every week. And, this is in a Midwest market (not Chicago).

 

The bottom line is, there is a client market for all kinds of escorts who offer a range of services. }(

 

Finally, Ben, please stop disparaging your competition, if even indirectly. It's very unseemly. x(

[Guest ncm2169]

P.S. Just so this isn't taken as yet another "Bash Ben" post (not that I give a flying fuck if it gets deleted), you could have said something like, "I find that my clients like a versatile escort, which I am. I also recognize that other escorts offer more limited services, and there are clients who also have more limited interests. Different strokes for different folks - it's what makes the world go around."

 

If you don't realize that fact, Ben, wake up. :*

[Rick Munroe]

>Escorts who don't perform like escorts should probably find

>another line of work.

 

Hmmm...well, I don't think it's important to "perform like an escort." I also don't think it's necessary to state what our fellow escorts should or shouldn't do. For me personally, I think it's important that everyone have a good time, that nobody's limits are disrespected (unless that's what they're looking for) and that the client feels like he just spent time with a fun sex buddy. If I thought I had to "perform like an escort," I'd probably start talking bad porn-speak ("Yeah, suck that cock! You like that tasty ass?!"), which would only make Derek laugh, and then how could he be a nasty top? :+

 

>Bluntly: If you don't enjoy sex or things of a sexual nature

>in a versatile, variety of ways, then DON'T become an escort.

 

I completely disagree. I'm versatile but there are lots of guys who are strictly top or strictly bottom or "oral only," etc., and I'm sure their clients are more than satisfied, since they know going into it what the escort truly enjoys and they can find a good match for their needs. Often, a "total bottom" client strongly prefers a "total top" escort, and vice versa. Being versatile is just not a requirement for being an escort.

 

>Why the hell would i want to suck someone's dick if they

>insist on wearing a condom while doing so?

 

Everyone has their own level of comfort -- their own sexual safety zone -- and we should all respect that, not disparage it. If your partner only gets sucked with condoms and you're not into it, then simply find another partner. It's that easy.

[Rick Munroe]

>P.S. Just so this isn't taken as yet another "Bash Ben" post

 

Well, it might be taken as a "Bash JT" post since you posted it as a reply to JT. :+

[Guest alanm]

>< Bluntly: If you don't enjoy sex or things of a sexual

>nature in a versatile, variety of ways, then DON'T become an

>escort.

>

>Bluntly, you're flat wrong. I'm a close friend of an

>escort who I introduced to "The Biz" who is bi-curious and

>very limited in his interaction. I was apprehensive about how

>many clients he'd attract, but he was an immediate hit and

>continues to get many requests for his time every week. And,

>this is in a Midwest market (not Chicago).

>

>The bottom line is, there is a client market for all kinds of

>escorts who offer a range of services.

 

I had almost exactly the same experience with a straight friend who had a full time job, but wanted to earn some extra money. There's a bigger market out there for straight guys than I realized. As to Ben, I stopped reading his message at the point when he said "my guys tell me...." I assume that "my guys" means his clients in Ben-speak.

[+ Axiom2001]

...that is why I prefer guys who are "versatile" or are "versatile tops." Last year I hired a guy who wouldn't kiss, something that is very important to me. I think he stated in his information that he was versatile.

 

When he chose NOT to be interactive, I chose NOT to continue with the appointment, so I gave him more $$$'s than I should have and aborted his and my time.

 

------------------------------If I want to jack off, there is NO NEED for me to have an escort by my side to the tune of some $250 and upwards.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Rick, I have a feeling that no matter what i would have posted, you would have found a way to disagree.

 

To each his own. That's what make us individuals

 

 

~BN