A GLOWING REVIEW FOR ANTHONY HOLLOWAY

[Guest regulation]

>Reg...I must have missed Anthony's post

>somehow the lsat time I

>posted, but HOLY SHIT!!

 

>So Boston Guy was right, he

>does occasionally treat the client

>right, and he confirmed what

>I knew all along: he

>does rip people off.

>

>If nothing else, I have gained

>a new respect for Anthony

>for finally telling the truth!

>

 

I wouldn't celebrate too soon if I were you. If history is any guide, we will soon see claims that the post is really by someone else or that AH's password was "stolen" by the nefarious unknown persons who are trying to discredit him. And then BG will solemnly urge us not to "dismiss that explanation out of hand." What do you want to bet? I'll give you two to one. :-)

[BewareofNick]

>I wouldn't celebrate too soon if

>I were you. If

>history is any guide, we

>will soon see claims that

>the post is really by

>someone else or that AH's

>password was "stolen" by the

>nefarious unknown persons who are

>trying to discredit him.

>And then BG will solemnly

>urge us not to "dismiss

>that explanation out of hand."

> What do you want

>to bet? I'll give

>you two to one.

>:-)

 

 

Well, it manifested itself sooner than I thought. I was going to copy and save the IM conversations I was having with Anthony and BiCuriousCoolman and now I'm kicking myself in the ass that I didn't.

[Guest regulation]

>Well, it manifested itself sooner than

>I thought. I was

>going to copy and save

>the IM conversations I was

>having with Anthony and BiCuriousCoolman

>and now I'm kicking myself

>in the ass that I

>didn't.

 

Just remember, they are NOT your enemies. They just want to discredit you and shut you up, that's all. :-)

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

LOL... sincere thanks for brightening my day with a good chuckle. :-)

 

"The human capacity for self-deception is almost infinite. "

 

Once again, we are in agreement.

[Guest regulation]

>Once again, we are in agreement.

 

Speak for yourself. I wouldn't agree with a schlockmeister like you if you insisted that the Atlantic Ocean contains water. :-) And don't get on your high horse about "negativity" and "personal attacks" now or ever again. Your posts in this thread have provided me with plenty of ammunition to use the next time you get up the nerve to criticize others for doing the same thing you do. I'm looking forward to it. :-)

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

"I wouldn't

agree with a schlockmeister like

you if you insisted that

the Atlantic Ocean contains water. "

> :-)

 

Reg, the smiley face seems to be in contradiction to the 'tone' of your words... or is it meant to express joy at the namecalling?

 

> And don't

>get on your high horse

>about "negativity" and "personal attacks"

>now or ever again.

 

Oops... should have read this before I posted above...

 

>Your posts in this thread

>have provided me with plenty

>of ammunition to use the

>next time you get up

>the nerve to criticize others

>for doing the same thing

>you do.

I'm looking

>forward to it. :-)

>

 

What surprises me here is not your willful misinterpretation of my comments (and the comments of others) but your overly dramatic wounded reaction as though YOUR ox has been gored.

 

Pick is a big boy and plenty capable of making his positions clear, maybe a little too clear. He chose to bring up certain subjects, I chose to explore them a little with his willing participation. He spoke his thoughts in his own words and I pointed them out -- in context, not out of context as some try to do. So relax and don't get you panties in a bunch. The ad hominem attacks on his part (which I guess you are embracing) was an attempt change the focus of the discussion, nothing more. Somehow I know your view will be different.

 

BTW, I'm also in agreement with some of your comments in one of the threads in the Attack on America forum and will be posting accordingly -- so, in light of your statement above, you might want to be readty to retract your orignial posts -- just a heads up for you.

[Guest regulation]

>Reg, the smiley face seems to

>be in contradiction to the

>'tone' of your words...

>or is it meant to

>express joy at the namecalling?

>

 

Who are you to accuse anyone else of namecalling, you bloody hypocrite? :-)

 

>What surprises me here is not

>your willful misinterpretation of my

>comments (and the comments of

>others) but your overly dramatic

>wounded reaction as though YOUR

>ox has been gored.

>

 

What surprises me about your post is . . . absolutely nothing. As usual, you accuse all around you of bad behavior while characterizing your own vicious crap-throwing as a harmless bit of fun. Your hypocrisy is nothing short of breathtaking. Good thing I do a lot of aerobics. :-)

 

 

>Pick is a big boy and

>plenty capable of making his

>positions clear, maybe a little

>too clear. He chose

>to bring up certain subjects,

>I chose to explore them

>a little with his willing

>participation. He spoke his

>thoughts in his own words

>and I pointed them out

>-- in context, not out

>of context as some try

>to do. So relax

>and don't get you panties

>in a bunch. The ad

>hominem attacks on his part

>(which I guess you are

>embracing) was an attempt change

>the focus of the discussion,

>nothing more. Somehow I

>know your view will be

>different.

 

 

My view is that, as you so often do, you attacked the speaker because you wanted to deflect attention from his message.

 

You didn't like the subject of this thread, which is a suspicious review by a hooker who has been accused by several clients of stealing. So, you engaged in personal attacks on one of the people who was talking about it so that THAT, rather than Anthony Holloway, would become the subject of the thread. Are you always this transparent? And save the girly-talk for your fellow nellies, would you? As a REAL queen once said, we are not amused. :-)

 

 

>

>BTW, I'm also in agreement with

>some of your comments in

>one of the threads in

>the Attack on America forum

>and will be posting accordingly

>-- so, in light of

>your statement above, you

>might want to be readty

>to retract your orignial posts

>-- just a heads up

>for you.

 

 

If you agree with anything I've said on the issue of the recent events, then I really need to re-think my positions. That would be a sure sign that I'm on the wrong track.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Reg,

 

Get a grip...

 

:-)

[Guest regulation]

>Reg,

>

>Get a grip...

 

 

Tamp,

 

Get some new cliches. :-)