Real Versus Fake Reviews

[Guest creosote]

>Whether any given review is fake

>will always be a matter

>of opinion, which makes it

>rather absurd to demand that

>people who express suspicions about

>a review or reviews must

>produce evidence to support their

>suspicions. In every case

>every site member must decide

>the issue for himself.

 

That about sums it up as far as I'm concerned.

[BuckyXTC]

>I did not write a review

>of Neil but probably should

>have. He provided excellent

>service; the only reason I

>did not use him again

>is that he was out

>of town when I was

>in Philadelphia.

 

I wish you would write a review of Neil; I've been seriously considering an appointment with him and would like to have all the information possible. He looks very cute in the posted photo.

 

As for the issue raised about Neil's reviews in an earlier post, that it might be generated by the agency trying to promote a new escort.....that could be true, but I'm more inclined to think that after we read a lot of these reviews, we tend to "unconsciously" incorporate some of the review lingo in our reviewing vocabulary.

 

I just wrote my first review a few days back (should be posted soon) and when I went back to read what I had written, I have to say that some of my phraseology could sound a bit trite or canned. That was not my intent. I was very happy with my first experience with an escort, and very appreciative of his efforts, hence a review that stated my satisfaction in honest words of appreciation. This will be the first review posted for this escort, and my experience with him necessitated a very positive review.

 

By nature, I'm a tough critic, but this young man exceeded my expectations to the degree that I've already set up another session. That said, I would also say that "first experiences", if positive, can be so special to the person having it that the same experience might be judged differently by someone who had hired many escorts.

 

Since my tastes run to the "kinky" side, not everyone will be interested in my recent "find". But for those with similar tastes, I think they'd be quite satisfied.

[BuckyXTC]

>I did not write a review

>of Neil but probably should

>have. He provided excellent

>service; the only reason I

>did not use him again

>is that he was out

>of town when I was

>in Philadelphia.

 

I wish you would write a review of Neil; I've been seriously considering an appointment with him and would like to have all the information possible. He looks very cute in the posted photo.

 

As for the issue raised about Neil's reviews in an earlier post, that it might be generated by the agency trying to promote a new escort.....that could be true, but I'm more inclined to think that after we read a lot of these reviews, we tend to "unconsciously" incorporate some of the review lingo in our reviewing vocabulary.

 

I just wrote my first review a few days back (should be posted soon) and when I went back to read what I had written, I have to say that some of my phraseology could sound a bit trite or canned. That was not my intent. I was very happy with my first experience with an escort, and very appreciative of his efforts, hence a review that stated my satisfaction in honest words of appreciation. This will be the first review posted for this escort, and my experience with him necessitated a very positive review.

 

By nature, I'm a tough critic, but this young man exceeded my expectations to the degree that I've already set up another session. That said, I would also say that "first experiences", if positive, can be so special to the person having it that the same experience might be judged differently by someone who had hired many escorts.

 

Since my tastes run to the "kinky" side, not everyone will be interested in my recent "find". But for those with similar tastes, I think they'd be quite satisfied.

[Laurent]

Neil is exactly what the Premier site says. I'm strictly vanilla and, therefore, don't know how he would be for kink. He does have a small ring in one nipple, a nice body, and a very handsome face. Sexually, he was dynamite, and I definitely will ask for him again.

[Laurent]

Neil is exactly what the Premier site says. I'm strictly vanilla and, therefore, don't know how he would be for kink. He does have a small ring in one nipple, a nice body, and a very handsome face. Sexually, he was dynamite, and I definitely will ask for him again.

[Matt_Vancouver]

Ok gurls back in your corners.

Fuck potato potaato...

If you want to talk about the limitations of a text based communication, go to a lauguage insititute and hash it out over tea and crumpets.

no offense intended.

matt(writes all of his own reviews)

http://go.to/mattsplace

matt_escort@yahoo.com

[Matt_Vancouver]

Ok gurls back in your corners.

Fuck potato potaato...

If you want to talk about the limitations of a text based communication, go to a lauguage insititute and hash it out over tea and crumpets.

no offense intended.

matt(writes all of his own reviews)

http://go.to/mattsplace

matt_escort@yahoo.com

[Matt_Vancouver]

Oooops, I mean 'writes all his own reviews' except for the one submitted by JT, Tampa Yankee, Graymit, Barry, Deej, NYObserver, CTDick, Swiftone, Scorpio, SFJeff, NiceGuy, Torjon, and anyone else I failed to mention: )

http://go.to/mattsplace

matt_escort@yahoo.com

[Matt_Vancouver]

Oooops, I mean 'writes all his own reviews' except for the one submitted by JT, Tampa Yankee, Graymit, Barry, Deej, NYObserver, CTDick, Swiftone, Scorpio, SFJeff, NiceGuy, Torjon, and anyone else I failed to mention: )

http://go.to/mattsplace

matt_escort@yahoo.com

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

A point of clarification here...

 

Matt does not write the reviews but he does script them -- setting the atmosphere, the dialog, the close-ups, the tension and release, more dialog, more...

 

:-)

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

A point of clarification here...

 

Matt does not write the reviews but he does script them -- setting the atmosphere, the dialog, the close-ups, the tension and release, more dialog, more...

 

:-)