SA: YOU'RE FIRED!!!

[+ deej]

To contact management follow the long-standing instructions:

 

Write to daddy@male4malescorts.com

 

It has been that way for ages, woodie. You know this.

[woodlawn]

>To contact management follow the long-standing instructions:

>

>Write to daddy@male4malescorts.com

>

>It has been that way for ages, woodie. You know this.

 

 

It took you how long to read and respond to my previous post -- five minutes? And you are still pretending that "management" would be in the dark about the information BoN posted on this board unless and until he went to the trouble of emailing them about it? Do you really think that is going to fool anyone?

[+ deej]

I am not management.

 

If you wish to engage management, that information has been publicly available for ages. In fact, only the name has changed in the last five years.

[Guest CTguy]

This whole SA thing is so blown out of proportion. If he lied about his age claiming he was 18 when really he was 16 or 17 its a terrible thing. He should not of done that. But it happened 2 or 3 years ago, he was a teenager then, how many teenagers do stupid things??? Nobody got hurt or went to prison. In fact I don't think anybody would of known about it if it wasn't brought up on this Message Board. Lets move on. I hire escorts because I think they are hot and want to have a good time with them , I'm not trying to hire a saint. I wouldn't care what he did as a teenager, or if he didn't tell the truth on some Message Board, or whatever else people are claiming he did.

[woodlawn]

>I

>wouldn't care what he did as a teenager, or if he didn't tell

>the truth on some Message Board, or whatever else people are

>claiming he did.

 

If you're not interested in finding out how escorts have treated their clients in the past, there really isn't much point in your visiting this site, since that is what it is for. In addition to BoN's comments, two other longtime posters have described their experiences with SA on this board. But of course, as you're not interested in the history of the escorts you hire, you won't care about what they have to say either.

[Guest CTguy]

Just to clarify. My comments were geared to the fact that SA lied about his age as a teenager and escorted when he was underage. If I was considering hiring him now, the fact that he did this a few years ago as a teenager would really not influence my decision too much. However, I read some other posting, I believe by KYtop, and his experience with SA would give me second thoughts about seeing him.

[Richard]

CTGuy has been a voice of reason in all this. So much that has been written here lacks that tone of balance. My advice is to be in touch with Scott Adler (or not) if he appeals to you (or doesn't). He seems to be a source of delight to many, with repeat business it seems. Others have other interests, which is the way it's supposed to be. To each his own. This is no uni-scort, who appeals to all, all the time.

 

The youthful indiscretions of Scott Adler strike me as ancient history, much as Congressman Henry Hyde, Great Puritan of Capitol Hill, tried to portray his illegitimate child when the story broke. (Of course, I think Henry was in his 30's or 40's at the time when he was dipping his wick where it didn't belong.) An ill-advised action by a teenager several years ago is hardly newsworthy. Thank God, most of them survive it and grow out of it. What would be appropriate to this board is whether Scott delivers a pleasant experience to his clients right now. For some, the answer is a rsoundin yes, for others, no thanks.

 

Some posters on this and related threads took some very cheap shots at a few posters who said supportive things about Scott, effectively claiming that these people were being fools and deceived into thinking that Scott really cared about the client. Wow, Scott's studly wiles must be really first class. But, shame on those posters who launched those attacks. To go after another poster who offered an opinion based on personal experience by ascribing motive or some special insight into the thoughts of the author is beneath contempt and I am afraid reflects poorly on the character of the author.

 

As someone who would have a second home by now if I hadn't so ardently pursued my hiring hobby, most people who hire an escort are not merely renting orifices or objects to fill their own. It's a connection, however brief, and living out a fantasy which, otherwise, would not take place. I note how many reviewers state that they prefer to hire guys for a few hours to include a meal so they can get to know the guy as though it's a friendly get together, one which is highly likely to lead to some close personal contact. Sure the clients who begin doodling their names and that of their favorite escort in their notebooks during homeroom are deceiving themselves, but most clients have too much sense or are happy to engage in the fantasy.

 

To me, at least, the distinction in terminology I have seen here is that the guys who want a blowjob in the alley are hiring streetwalkers or hustlers. People who want to meet a guy and live out a fantasy for an hour or a week are hiring escorts. I think labelng escorts strrt trash, hustlers or #### is just name calling.

 

I would ask that everyone who has been posting here recently on Scott, particularly the ones with with many, many replies and rejoinders go to their local ATM, get some cash, hire an escort who appeals to them and then write a review. I didn't have the time to do a thorough analysis, but my casual observation is that most of the repeat SA posters have submitted very few reviews.

[Epigonos]

Richard I had promised myself that I was finished posting on these Scott Adler threads and then along comes your rational, reasonable, and intelligent post and I am forced to break that promise. I couldn't agree with you more. Everyone on of your points is well taken. I for one did exactly what you recommend that clients of Scott do. Long before all of the furor regarding Scott began I spend a great evening with him having dinner and two hours of great sex. If anybody cares to know what I thought of that evening all they have to do is read Scott's review #16 on this site. Even after reading all the multitude of inane comments regarding Scott posted here I wouldn't change a word of that review. Thanks again for a great post.

[woodlawn]

>I am not management.

 

That statement ranks with statements like "The Iraqi insurgency is in its last throes," and "I would be glad to send more troops to Iraq if our military commanders asked for them."

[+ deej]

Believe whatever you want. You will anyway.

 

Here's a copy of the email. If you doubt this was sent, ask Barry and Cooper. They were copied.

 

Would you like to spread any more lies? Or is one enough for today?

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: deej [mailto:deej@dfapam.com]

Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 3:27 PM

To: 'Daddy'

Cc: 'Barry'; 'Cooper II';

Subject: Resignation

 

Dear Daddy,

 

I resign from all involvement with M4M.

[woodlawn]

>Believe whatever you want. You will anyway.

 

I certainly will.

 

>Here's a copy of the email.

 

Your email is dated July of this year. As I stated in a previous post in this subthread, you were part of management for a long period while the information BoN unearthed was posted on this site, and you did not uncover it or take any action in regard to it. But that indisputable fact does not stop you from criticizing BoN for performing a valuable service for this site that you, ostensibly one of the persons most concerned with protecting it over a period of years, failed to perform. The word "ingrate" comes to mind. Among others.

 

 

>Would you like to spread any more lies? Or is one enough for

>today?

 

The reason you have a problem with what BoN said is NOT that it's a lie, but that it's the truth. I think that says it all.

[Guest alanm]

>As someone who would have a second home by now if I hadn't so

>ardently pursued my hiring hobby, most people who hire an

>escort are not merely renting orifices or objects to fill

>their own. It's a connection, however brief, and living out a

>fantasy which, otherwise, would not take place. I note how

>many reviewers state that they prefer to hire guys for a few

>hours to include a meal so they can get to know the guy as

>though it's a friendly get together, one which is highly

>likely to lead to some close personal contact. Sure the

>clients who begin doodling their names and that of their

>favorite escort in their notebooks during homeroom are

>deceiving themselves, but most clients have too much sense or

>are happy to engage in the fantasy.

 

I agree completely with the above paragraph. I've done the 1 hour hiring and the overnights, but 2-3 hours seems just right to me because you get to know the escort a little as a person. That's just me. I do not have enough money to hire escorts for overnights on a regular basis even if I wanted to.

 

Some people may see this thread as a lot of bull over not very much. Not me. The last week or so remind me of the old days when people argued all the time. Giving any information, especially the handle of the reviewer, about the early reviews may have been a compromise decision, but was still a mistake. I know that I would not my name

still posted.

[+ deej]

Woodlawn, qualified legal opinions do not agree with your assessment of the situation. Then again, you're passing judgement without knowing what the fuck you're talking about as usual.

 

So you're wrong as well as telling a lie. How proud you must be!

 

As I said, if you wish to contact management write to daddy@male4malescorts.com.

[VaHawk]

Since when has woodlawn EVER admitted he was wrong???? Doesn't matter how much irrefutable facts you use, the dude just WON'T admit he is wrong! :7

 

He'd argue that the sky isn't REALLY blue, but rather that you are color blind! :7

[woodlawn]

>Woodlawn, qualified legal opinions do not agree with

>your assessment of the situation. Then again, you're passing

>judgement without knowing what the fuck you're talking about

>as usual.

 

The fact is, I'm in a position to summon far more qualified opinions far more quickly and easily than you or anyone else associated with this site. Those I have consulted agree with me. You, on the other hand, know absolutely nothing about this subject -- people who do have some knowledge of the subject could tell you anything, and you'd swallow it because you don't know any better.

 

 

>So you're wrong as well as telling a lie. How proud you must

>be!

 

Your habit of vicious and hateful responses to anyone who questions any of your actions is what led to your downfall here. Mind you, I'm not complaining about that, as it afforded me much amusement (and still does). But someone needs to tell you that if you don't break this habit, it will only lead to more trouble for you in the future. It's a pity you don't have any friends who care enough about you to be honest with you about this.

[+ deej]

Contact management by writing to daddy@male4malescorts.com.

 

Oops. After all these years, I mistyped the URL.

[+ deej]

>Since when has woodlawn EVER admitted he was wrong????

 

Never has and never will. And I know it. But it's fun to get him all puffed up and watch him fume. }( Sorta like watching 4th of July fireworks, but without the danger or smell.

 

It's particularly fun to watch him fume when he IS so dead wrong and totally has no clue about it.

 

Now he's "summoning up" legal opinions. Is he holding a seance!?!?!?!

 

Completely laughable.