When Two Worlds Collide...

[Traveller]

>I can't imagine why anyone would think that being on the other

>side of an argument from you or the other weirdos who

>congregate here would constitute "trouble." What are the

>consequences of being in such a position -- that some

>anonymous old poof I'll never meet won't like me? Why would I

>or anyone give a shit about that?

 

Shit, W-man. You appear to be in serious trouble again. Woe is you. Alan has you by the short ones and he's not releasing - praying for release, but not releasing. Neither is Lucky, and he's usually pretty easy. Glad I could come to your rescue yet another time.

 

>I posted a good deal in this thread before learning that

>Cougar had made a fool of himself (by his own admission) by

>re-hiring someone who had ditched him on a previous occasion

>-- only to be ditched again. I don't know why you want to lie

>about something that is right on the board for everyone to

>see.

>

>In previous threads you've said that I spend so much time

>posting here that it shows I have nothing to do while you, on

>the other hand, are a busy working man. It must now be

>obvious to everyone that you have plenty of spare time to read

>and respond to my posts, although you've also said that I

>always write about things that in your words, "bore us all."

>Your posts reveal nothing much about me, but they do reveal

>you to be a fantasist and hatemonger.

>

 

You posted far too many words with these two paragraphs, so pardon me if I ignore them. They're probably really, really good, but the retired Spaniard is coming over to pound my butt before I join the guy I'm currently dating to go to an Oscar party. Next time I promise to read your entire post, but remember to keep it under 1000 words.

 

Later.

 

PS. "Old poof" is a bit harsh. Use either "mincing fairy" or "lisping nancy" next time.

 

PPS. Shockheaded Peter is clever. Drink a double espresso beforehand.

[woodlawn]

>Shit, W-man. You appear to be in serious trouble again. Woe

>is you. Alan has you by the short ones and he's not releasing

>- praying for release, but not releasing. Neither is Lucky,

>and he's usually pretty easy. Glad I could come to your

>rescue yet another time.

 

Yes, do please rescue me from this dreadful predicament. If I have to read one more of alanm's boring, repetitious tirades, I'll . . . give a great big yawn.

 

 

> Next time I promise to read your entire post, but

>remember to keep it under 1000 words.

 

Will do.

 

 

>PS. "Old poof" is a bit harsh. Use either "mincing fairy" or

>"lisping nancy" next time.

 

 

Duly noted.