Jump to content

Escort Jake Walker

kjun

By kjun
in The Deli

This topic is 6015 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

kjun Proficient

kjun

Posted
Posted

Todays review of Jake Walker says he is in his 20s. Jake was my first escort and he is a great escort. But he is not in his 20s. He is in his 30s. I would reccomend Jake to anyone. He is that good. Just don't expect a twink.

 

the Cajun

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

He's well into his 30s. It's been ten years since I first hired him, and he was in his mid-20s then. It's amazing he still escorts since he has a lot of other things going for him. I guess he enjoys the extra cash every once in a while. Nice guy, but shame on him for such a big lie!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Adono

Guest Adono

Posted
Posted

Your choice, of course, but if you were looking for a twink why did you call him in the first place? Jake may not have updated his age, and doing so wouldn't hurt his business at all, but he doesn't advertise himself as a twink. He does emphasize how good he is as a top, and that is really truth in advertising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

>Jake may not have

>updated his age

 

Oh, for God's sake. He's used the same picture for just about a decade now. It's incredibly dishonest. I wouldn't blame someone for walking out on him. It serves him right. The picture and age description are such big lies, it's insulting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jake Walker Newbie

Jake Walker

Posted
Posted

Thanks for your kind words Kjun. I do remember you. And being a fellow Cajun, I appreciate your kind heart.

 

To set the record straight: I've been escorting for 7 years now, so it's funny that "Unicorn" claims to have hired me 10 years ago. Barring the ability to travel through time, I'm not sure how he could have hired me prior to when I started working in the biz.

 

And the signature B&W body pic I use on my site was taken in July of '99, and my website didn't go online until January of 2000 - only 4 years ago - not the "about a decade" Unicorn claims. The other pics - on the XXX page of my site - are even more recent, and they are all very accurate.

 

So if anyone was unhappy with me, I apologize about that. I see well over 200 clients per year, so I surely can't please everyone all the time ... anymore than any of you could. We're only human afterall.

 

In any event guys, keep in mind that one should never believe everything you read online. Many of the negative things written on this site are written anonymously by other escorts pretending to be clients, so they can trash their competitors, hoping to hog all the business for themselves. One would be wise to ignore much of the negative things you read about escorts online.

 

So please: be good to each other, and don't waste your time arguing. Life's way too short!

 

Best to you all,

Jake Walker

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest random

Guest random

Posted
Posted

Jake's answer was appropriate. He should not be forced to answer a no win question. If he said he was 31 or 36 someone here will not believe him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boston Guy Community Regular

Boston Guy

Posted
Posted

Clearly "straight up" is a persona created expressly for the purpose of criticizing Jake Walker: all three posts have been in this thread.

 

I see several possibilities:

 

1) "Straight Up" is a fellow escort who is trying to compete with Jake and has taken this approach in an attempt to diminish Jake. (Possible.)

 

2) "Straight Up" is someone who is new to the Message Center but has chosen to begin his career here with a single-minded critique of a long-standing, well-regarded escort. (Not too likely.)

 

3) "Straight Up" is someone who has posted here before but wants to keep his other Message Center persona hidden from this thread. In that case, one must question his motives for posting in this thread. (Most likely.)

 

In any event, "Straight Up" seems to be anything but straight up. Jake Walker has been a popular, well-regarded escort for more than five years. His clients have always seemed to be quite satisfied with him, at least by and large, and his reputation as a classy guy is well known.

 

As Jake himself says, no one can satisfy everyone all of the time. But if he didn't provide a good service, the word would have been out a long time ago. Instead, his clients tend to sing his praises.

 

I've never met Jake but almost did a few years ago while in San Francisco. Worked popped up at the last minute and I had to cancel with little notice. Jake handled the situation with grace and aplomb.

 

And, if I recall correctly, Jake was going to retire three or four years ago and announced a retirement date. He was convinced by lots of loyal clients not to retire. I seem to remember a few busy threads at Atkol about Jake and even back then people loved the guy. He's definitely not 20 and he probably is in his early 30s. Based on what I hear, he's a good example of a good escort becoming even better over time.

 

Straight Up seems to me to have an underhanded motive in his participation in this thread. I hope Jake understands that he is being baited by someone who does not have his interests at heart. I would recommend that he simply stick with the classy reply he posted above.

 

BG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Julian Kaye

Guest Julian Kaye

Posted
Posted

This Picture Was Used

 

http://www.topsfstud.com/TopSFstudA.JPG was used by Jake to cruise on AOL as early as 1997 so could not have been taken in 1999.

 

Jake's bio on his site says he's 29. This woulda made him 22 when we met.

 

Jake IS a nice guy. The XXX shots MAY BE "even more recent" (whats that mean, 2000? 2001?) and they MAY BE "all very accurate" but hard to know without paying, eh Jake. You could throw some NON XXX shots on that are also "even more recent" - - how bout it, big guy?

 

>And the signature B&W body pic I use on my site was taken in

>July of '99, and my website didn't go online until January of

>2000 - only 4 years ago - not the "about a decade" Unicorn

>claims. The other pics - on the XXX page of my site - are

>even more recent, and they are all very accurate.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 6 months later...
woodlawn Explorer

woodlawn

Posted
Posted

>Clearly "straight up" is a persona created expressly for the

>purpose of criticizing Jake Walker: all three posts have been

>in this thread.

 

That may well be, but the most telling criticisms in this thread come from longtime posters like glutes and Unicorn. Do you think they are also escorts who are trying to trash the competition?

 

>In any event, "Straight Up" seems to be anything but straight

>up. Jake Walker has been a popular, well-regarded escort for

>more than five years.

 

>And, if I recall correctly, Jake was going to retire three or

>four years ago and announced a retirement date.

 

If he's only been an escort for five years or so and was going to retire three or four years ago he must have had a mighty brief career at that point.

 

Aside from the fact that there are some posters who will defend almost any conduct by an escort, what this thread illustrates is the difficulty of knowing an escort's precise or even approximate age. I don't think most clients here care about the precise age, they just don't like it when escorts post ads or pictures that are so obviously out of whack that it seems clients are being scammed. If, as glutes said, the escort looks so different from his pictures that a new client might be shocked by the difference, there's a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VaHawk Enthusiast

VaHawk

Posted
Posted

"Aside from the fact that there are some posters who will defend almost any conduct by an escort, what this thread illustrates is the difficulty of knowing an escort's precise or even approximate age. I don't think most clients here care about the precise age, they just don't like it when escorts post ads or pictures that are so obviously out of whack that it seems clients are being scammed. If, as glutes said, the escort looks so different from his pictures that a new client might be shocked by the difference, there's a problem."

 

Well said woodlawn. IMO, you hit the proverbial nail on the head! I really don't understand either the need of some posters to defend any conduct from an escort, ALWAYS stating that any problem is the FAULT/MISUNDERTANDING/LACK OF CHEMISTRY of/by the client, nor the emphasis placed on "precise age".

 

I really could not personally tell that an escort who advertises as being 22 is really 25, and really I don't see why it is such a BIG deal in that type of scenario. WHO really cares, as long as the escort looks like his currently posted photos?

 

Looking like the current photos posted is the IMPORTANT fact, not the biological age of the escort! Anyone who is HUNG up on age alone, despite the physical presentation (which is the MAIN reason, imo, any client would seek further info), has his own issues to deal with, most of them shallow. Such an attitude is a real disservice to the escort/client business, when HOT men have to lie about their real age, just because many clients can't fathom that sexiness, hotness, and sexual appeal has NOTHING to do with age. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eastbayguy Enthusiast

eastbayguy

Posted
Posted

>I really could not personally tell that an escort who

>advertises as being 22 is really 25, and really I don't see

>why it is such a BIG deal in that type of scenario. WHO

>really cares, as long as the escort looks like his currently

>posted photos?

 

Neither can I. Reliable authority tells me the only way to know for sure is cut 'em down and count the rings. This is rarely practical.

 

:p

 

--EBG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Axiom2001 Grand Master

+ Axiom2001

Posted
Posted

>I saw him several years ago and he looked at least 30 then.

>I also didn't have so very good experience with him. He was

>one of the worst kissers.......

 

 

My time with Jake was "not all that" either! Since our time together was indeed marginal, I decided NOT to write any kind of review of him!

 

And I definitely concur with the initial respondent here: "He was one of the worst kissers...!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Contact Info:

The Company of Men
5834 C. North Kings Hwy #4343
Alexandria, VA 22303

Email: moderators@companyofmen.org

Help Support Our Site

Our site operates with the support of our members. Make a one-time donation using the buttons below.

$10 $25 $50 $100 $200

Make a recurring donation

Additional Resources

×
×
  • Create New...