Cheap at twice the price?

[Guest sdmuscl4hire]

naw,,,, they told me if i made my lips all pouty like that I could charge 400 too, I just couldnt get it right though,,,,,,,, damn

[VaHawk]

>My, my vahawk--do you actually read what you write? It's like

>sometimes you are an OK guy and then othertimes (more often it

>seems now) you REALLY go off the deep end:( Maybe it will

>help if Congress passes the prescriotion drug package for

>Medicare recips--then you don't have to choose between "guns

>and butter" or to make it simpler for you, between escorts

>and Lithium :+

 

Nope, I seldom read what I post, as I write what I feel at the moment, but how about you?

 

LOL, if you think that I am old enough to be on medicare (believe me, I will never live that long).

 

OOOH! Guns and Butter? Well didn't you have to endure freshman economics 101 in college? BRAVO!! Well, I guess I really am a simpleton, as you really need to expound upon a domestic economic theory and how that relates to a choice between hiring escorts and buying lithium, as I really don't get the connection?

 

Deep end? Isn't everything deep to the shallow?

 

LOL, don't you know by now that HAWK has many personas, and as such that he loves them all and that he lets each and everyone have the full reign of his thoughts and voice? Each is allowed to come out and play, from sweet suck up Mary Jane (everyone's least favorite, btw, as her sugary treacle makes the rest of us puke) to raving Randy (he surely is a raving, belligerent lunatic, not the favorite but in the top 3). At the present time old mild Marvin is posting, not offensive, just mellowed out.

 

We all thank you for your pop psycho analyis as it is appreciated, but really all of us are in a totally different universe than you and as such you and we speak totally different languages.

 

>throw it away so it doesn't have to be seen here--oh look,

>maybe that's what you are doing here:

 

LMFAO! Flower, but really has your sense of humor never progressed past the grade school playground level?

[Guest YFSC]

> but of course only you have the right to gush on about any escort you

>have the "hots" for right? The rest of us who do so, are "mean spirited",

>"jerks", and "bastards" if we do what you do, right?

 

How nice to see you say this.

 

It's interesting that here you passionately defend the right of "the rest of us" to "gush on" about an escort that someone "[has] the 'hots' for," while elsewhere you repeatedly and viciously castigate the fans of Bruno Gaucho for (as you claim) doing exactly that (even though that is *not* what their posts were about and you were misrepresenting them). Is it only *you* that has that right??

 

Another supersized helping of hypocrisy, anyone?

[VaHawk]

I love the way you just pipe right up without having any idea of what was posted on the thread previously and/or what prior posts were exchanged by me and Flower on other threads, leading to this post here.

 

You must be a pimp for BG, as you never miss an opportunity to bring him up do you? Your railing indignations about my BG posts are really insipid, tiring and above all BORING to me and probably everyone else here. So give it a rest, and crawl back under your rock.

[Guest YFSC]

>I love the way you just pipe right up without having any idea

>of what was posted on the thread previously and/or what prior

>posts were exchanged by me and Flower on other threads,

>leading to this post here.

 

There you go again...

making outrageous statements and claims about something which you *clearly* *cannot* know anything about. How do you presume to know what I have an idea of, or what I have or have not read? Just another example of you blowing hot air.

 

And do you *really* think that it's not possible that I read "what was posted on the thread previously" or something else that is in the MC? I read every word, sweetie pie, and I know exactly "what was posted on the thread previously." And I wasn't reading it to check up on you: I was reading it to read it, when I came upon your astonishingly hypocritical and self-contradictory remark.

 

Aside from which, it doesn't matter if I know "what was posted on the thread previously." The point of my comment is to expose your hypocrisy. I was comparing your comment here to your previous comment(s) elsewhere, and it doesn't matter whether I know "what was posted on the thread previously."

 

>You must be a pimp for BG, as you never miss an opportunity to

>bring him up do you?

 

You are true to form yet again. When you are caught with your pants down and can't wriggle out of the situation, you just ignore the substance of the remarks and counter with an invented insult. I'm not Bruno's pimp, and it's not that I miss or don't miss an opportunity to bring him up. Bruno is tangential to the point here. He just happens to be the focus of your trashy remarks that I was comparing this one to, so when I refer to them I can't help bringing up Bruno. *You* chose him, not me.

 

The point, which you are trying to obscure, is to expose your hypocrisy and your self-contradictory pronouncements.

 

OK. Now you can again ignore the substantive point and make another response with other irrelevant, misleading and insulting remarks. That's OK, and you can have the last word. I have made my point here and I will leave it at that.

[VaHawk]

Well not to disappoint you yet again, I will indeed remain true to form and tell you once again, what a boring asshole you are.

[Doug69]

Hey, Hawk - I hadn't read this thread for awhile and just checked up on it. I'm glad to see you're making friends again.

 

>Hey Skunkweed got your cock all hard and out of shape for

>Rick? This is only the umpteenth post on this board that your

>dick has dribbled precum about him, . . .

 

Flower does one of 2 things on this Board: he (1) puts on an apron and lipstick and then, fully gussied up, oogles over escorts in the girliest, most maternal, most feminiely judgmental manner; or (2) gives rancid, incoherent, incredibly trite lectures to other people about their behavior, sometimes (most nauseatingly) including his shallow understanding of the law which is typical of two-bit car accident/petty personal injury lawyers like him.

 

It looks like here, in the post to which you responded, he combined (1) and (2) in a single repulsive post oogling over Rick. What a bonus.

 

>BTW: As soon as I find

>a picture of a limp, shriveld old cock with pustules dripping

>syhilitic ooze, I will be sure to post it here on the message

>center with your name attached to it, but then again I'm sure

>that would be an insult to the syphilitic cock.

 

If you do this, all the little stunted first-graders will giggle at this funny joke, just like they loved Flower's super creative, incredibly funny posting of pictures with people's names next to them!

 

Either that, or they will get upset and tell the hall monitors that you're a bad boy for writing people's names next to pictures of syphllitic penises and beg the hall monitors to stop you.

 

Have any guesses?

[VaHawk]

>Hey, Hawk - I hadn't read this thread for awhile and just

>checked up on it. I'm glad to see you're making friends

>again.

 

LMAO! Like anyone is a friend in cyberspace? Unless you actually meet someone here, and I do believe most people who post here are okay, how can you call someone on a message board a "friend"?

 

What is with all the Purple Barney bs "I love you" and "you love me"? I truly expect any day now to click here and find Barney as cover boy of the day! I mean everyday, this site degenerates into an Aunt Bea sewing circle with our good bud Flower as the queen bee peering down his little glasses and snapping his scissors as he lectures us.

 

But let's not forget all the self-satisfied ones who come here and pimp their "favorites" and deny all the time that they're pimping. I bet old YFSC just loved to see my post so he could post his ridiculous denials and accusations. I can just picture him now, oooh, oooh oooh I can launch an attack against the Hawkster, regardless of whether I know anything about the facts. I bet he got so damn het up that the saliva dribbled out of both corners of his mouth and dribbled down his double chins while he popped his 3 inch hardon.

 

Damn it Doug69, you do know how to bring out the raving Randy persona in me! Not complaining, btw.

 

>Either that, or they will get upset and tell the hall monitors

>that you're a bad boy for writing people's names next to

>pictures of syphllitic penises and beg the hall monitors to

>stop you.

>

>Have any guesses?

 

Well, there are so many to choose from! that I just don't know where to start.

[Guest YFSC]

>But let's not forget all the self-satisfied ones who come here

>and pimp their "favorites" and deny all the time that they're

>pimping. I bet old YFSC just loved to see my post so he could

>post his ridiculous denials and accusations. I can just

>picture him now, oooh, oooh oooh I can launch an attack

>against the Hawkster, regardless of whether I know anything

>about the facts. I bet he got so damn het up that the saliva

>dribbled out of both corners of his mouth and dribbled down

>his double chins while he popped his 3 inch hardon.

 

You got it, VaHack, baby. I live just to blast the Hackster. But you shouldn't make it so easy. It's not as much fun.

 

And others are pimping if they write about their favorites but, of course, it's not pimping when *you* fawn over Benjamin Nicholas or David Gartner or Sebastian the Confederate or any of the others. Can you say "HYPOCRISY," boys and girls?

 

But you got a couple of things wrong, Hack. It's *triple* chins, not double, and that's cum dribbling down.

 

As for "the facts," they're all there in blue and white on your screen and everybody else's. You put them there yourself, in this thread and in others, for all to see.

[VaHawk]

>You got it, VaHack, baby. I live just to blast the Hackster.

>But you shouldn't make it so easy. It's not as much fun.

 

Well, here you are responding yet AGAIN, so I think my point is game,

set and match!

 

>And others are pimping if they write about their favorites

>but, of course, it's not pimping when *you* fawn over Benjamin

>Nicholas or David Gartner or Sebastian the Confederate or any

>of the others.

 

Well let's start with David, as I guess if some compliments and expressed interests in what he posts and in meeting him makes that "fawning" then so be it. But you DID NOTICE that unlike you I'm not saying he is a great escort without doubt, without ever having met him, unlike you and others who PRAISED BG and branded anyone who questioned your out and out pimping bs as BRUNO BASHERS. What's the matter, are you finding that BG is "yesterday's news" and not lining your pimp assed pockets as much as he did during his last grand tour of the USA? I bet Bruno is a great guy, but unfortunately for him, he ran into pimp slime like you!

 

As far as Benjamin and Bastian, I will express my feelings about each as I see fit, as I have engaged the company of Benjamin twice and Bastian once and for never less than an overnight encounter. I have flown both here to DC and spent the weekend with both, so when I praise them, I am speaking from experience. Have you done the same with those escorts you "fawn over" or are you yet, once again just passing gas in the wind? I'd bet on the latter!

 

But then again, you only post about Montreal where the exchange rate for American dollars buys you more bang for the buck and Brazil where the bang for the buck is even better! I bet you wouldn't pay anything more for than $20 American for any escort, ergo your praises for Brazil. I don't like the term whore, but if there is such a thing as a "cheap whore" then you are the epitome of "cheap whoremonger"!

 

 

Can you say "HYPOCRISY," boys and girls?

 

"That's OK, and you can have the last word. I have made my point here and I will leave it at that."

 

NOPE, NO SIR, NO WAY, ABSOULUTELY NO HYPOCRISY HERE!

And I do believe everyone who posts here is a man, not either a boy or a girl, unless you mean "pussy" which you are.

 

>

>But you got a couple of things wrong, Hack. It's *triple*

>chins, not double, and that's cum dribbling down.

>

OOOOOH! Aren't you the fat little sex pig! I bet when you go to Rio you hire a whole gang of $15 boys to piss and cum all over you, don't you? I bet there is cum dripping out of your eyes, your butt, your ears and dribbling down your chin? OOOH SQUEAL SEX PIG!

[Guest YFSC]

>Well, here you are responding yet AGAIN, so I think my point

>is game, set and match!

 

No way, Jose. I said that I had made my point and was done in that *other* conversation. That one is over and you had the last word there.

 

Now you have started up again in another context, in your post #37715. I didn't say I would not respond to your outrageous, distorted and abusive attacks in other places. You were responding to Doug69 and I was not part of that conversation, but you just had to take a cheap shot at me, didn't you.

 

And the Hackster seems to have a VERY strange idea of " game, set and match, " or even getting a "point." If you think you have "won" because I responded to your scurrilous comment you are even more seriously deluded than I thought. It's more like you keep shooting yourself in the foot with your abusive rants.

 

>Well let's start with David, ...

>As far as Benjamin and Bastian, ...

 

You set about justifying your "qualifications" to comment on these escorts. That's totally irrelevant to the issue here, and you needn't have done so. And, by the way, even though by now you may have hired Benjamin and Bastian, your panting over them on the MC began *before* you knew or hired them (that's documented in these archives), so your justification is irrelevant.

 

You missed the point entirely. Or maybe you got the point but deliberately chose to try to twist it into something else. You are entitled to praise or pant over any escort you want, whether you know him or not. I NEVER said that you or anyone else couldn't or shouldn't. That's opposed to your pronouncements, when you have blasted posters for doing just that, and then you turned around and did the same thing yourself. (THAT's hypocrisy.)

 

And I didn't say above that you were wrong to comment on those 3 escorts. All I said (READ it, Hack, especially after accusing me of not having read the posts) was that when others do it you call it "pimping," but it's apparently not "pimping" when *you* do it. I didn't fault the activity; only the label. I merely pointed out that, while you feel free to praise or pant over escorts yourself, whether you know them or not, you castigate others for doing the same thing. Understand now? How can I make it clearer?

 

>But you DID NOTICE that

>unlike you I'm not saying he is a great escort without doubt,

>without ever having met him, unlike you and others who PRAISED

>BG and branded anyone who questioned your out and out pimping

>bs as BRUNO BASHERS.

 

*WRONG WRONG WRONG*

*FALSE FALSE FALSE*

*DISTORTION DISTORTION DISTORTION*

 

You continue to LIE and DISTORT and to repeat your invented, uintrue and unsupported claim that I have said Bruno is a great escort. I have chanllenged you in the past to find such a comment from me, and you have not been able to. Yet you continue to propagate your scurrilous falsehood and then to castigate me for it.

 

I have NEVER -- that's NEVER -- said anything in the MC about the my opionion of the escort performance, either positive or negative, of Bruno or any other escort, either knowing him or not (though once or twice I may have referred to the remarks of others, with clear indication that the remarks were somebody else's).

 

I do not comment on the performance of escorts here in the MC. I write reviews in the review section when I want to comment on their performance. Here I limit myself to commenting on principles and issues, expressing my likes or dislikes, asking for or supplying concrete information (other than evaluations of escorts' performance, and usually in response to a request for the information), pointing out unfair, unsupported or baseless allegations (that's how I got involved in the arguments over Bruno), drawing attention to discrepancies (such as the hypocrisy of your position), etc.

 

What I *did* do regarding Bruno was to take issue with you and 2 other mean-spirited posters who were obsessed with unfairly bashing him, and to point out your (the 3 of you) distortions, untruths, half-truths, illogic, unfairness, invented assertions and unsupported allegations. And here you are again doing the same thing in anther context: making false, invented allegations and spreading distortions about me and what I said.

I CHALLENGE YOU AGAIN TO FIND JUST ONE COMMENT FROM ME, EITHER PRO OR CON, ABOUT THE ESCORT PERFORMANCE OF BRUNO OR ANYONE ELSE.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

 

>As far as Benjamin and Bastian, I will express my feelings

>about each as I see fit, as I have engaged the company of

>Benjamin twice and Bastian once and for never less than an

>overnight encounter. I have flown both here to DC and spent

>the weekend with both, so when I praise them, I am speaking

>from experience.

 

Well, gee, aren't you the high roller. But a) you started salivating over them in the MC *before* you knew them (so your "experience" is irrelevant to the point at hand), b) I am not questioning and have not questioned your prerogative to write anything you want about them, whether you know them or not, and c) I am not questioning and have not questioned their performance as escorts.

 

>Have you done the same with those escorts you

>"fawn over" or are you yet, once again just passing gas in the

>wind? I'd bet on the latter!

 

I don't "fawn over" or express my opinion of ANY escort here in the MC, no matter what I have or have not done with him.

 

>But then again, you only post about Montreal where the

>exchange rate for American dollars buys you more bang for the

>buck and Brazil where the bang for the buck is even better! I

>bet you wouldn't pay anything more for than $20 American for

>any escort, ergo your praises for Brazil.

 

False again. You lose the bet and you quite obviously don't know what you are talking about. Besides Montreal, I post about the US too. And I *do not* post about Brazil. I have NEVER posted about Brazil. You are again making it all up.

 

>> "That's OK, and you can have the last word. I have made my

>> point here and I will leave it at that."

>

>NOPE, NO SIR, NO WAY, ABSOULUTELY NO HYPOCRISY HERE!

 

Do you see the word "here"? This is a different context, one which *you* created by your gratuitous slam at me in the middle of a go-around with Doug69. I never said that I would not expose you for what you are or point out your misstatements and distortions. That's NOT hypocrisy.

 

>> Can you say "HYPOCRISY," boys and girls?

>

>And I do believe everyone who posts here is a man, not either

>a boy or a girl, unless you mean "pussy" which you are.

 

You are showing your apparent ignorance of American popular culture and inability to recognize a cultural allusion and common colloquial espression. Perhaps you should get out more.

 

>I bet when you go

>to Rio you hire a whole gang of $15 boys to piss and cum all

>over you, don't you? I bet there is cum dripping out of your

>eyes, your butt, your ears and dribbling down your chin?

 

You lose the bets. All of them. It seems you're just an all-around loser.

 

>your out and out pimping

>not lining your pimp assed pockets...

>he ran into pimp slime like you!

>or are you yet, once again just passing gas in the wind? I'd bet on the latter!

>I bet you wouldn't pay anything more for than $20...

>you are the epitome of "cheap whoremonger"!

>unless you mean "pussy" which you are.

>OOOOOH! Aren't you the fat little sex pig!

>you hire a whole gang of $15 boys to piss and cum all over you, don't you?

>there is cum dripping out of your eyes, your butt, your ears and dribbling down your chin?

>OOOH SQUEAL SEX PIG!

 

Your puerile outburst ('puerile' - look it up) and scurrilous ad hominem attacks (yeah, look up 'ad hominem' too) only go to prove to one and all that you have no firm ground to stand on. That is the last resort of someone who has no valid facts or substantive arguments to present.

[Trixie]

RE:Tom Boswell

 

Shriek!!!~ You have to admit VAHawk, our lovely posey got you on this one!

La Trix

[VaHawk]

RE:Tom Boswell

 

Et tu Trix?

 

No one "gets me" on this one or any other one. Why? Because Hawk is not out to "get anyone"! Hawk's major flaw is to keep thinking that the rest of the world, "gets" his views of what constitutes wry humor, parody and subtle role playing.

 

SIGH, I keep coming here as every now and then I run across a poster who is humorous and holds out promise, such as yourself, but what's the damn point anymore? It seems ALMOST everyone else here, is so SERIOUS! But like most encounters in my life, I find that I'm speaking Venutian and they're speaking Martian. A lot seems to get lost in the translation.

 

There are people here, who "get" me sometimes, none that "get" me all the time and some who just don't "get" me at all! As such, I never totally connect with anyone here. It is mostly the ones that don't "get" me at all, that hurl the most insulting comments at me and presume to tell me all about what/who I am, and those are the ones that I in return, most misinterpret as wanting to play the insulting game. What was I thinking? as everything just goes "way, way over the moon, sight unseen" with these guys.

 

Oh, well Hawkster is definitely getting bored with the scene, which is why he loves to see someone like Doug69, someone who has a sense of humor and loves to "rile" things up come along.

 

Oh well, as Miss Scarlett said, "Tomorrow is another day" x(

[Pierce_NYC]

RE: That's all Folks!

 

>Hawk is not out to "get anyone"

>SIGH,

>Oh, well Hawkster is definitely getting bored with the scene,

 

>Oh well, as Miss Scarlett said, "Tomorrow is another day" x(

 

Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn!