Scott Adler's review seems fishy

[bigguyinpasadena]

Does anyone else get a smell coming of Scott Adlers reviews?I hope I'm wrong-as the kid is gorgeous-but at least 3 of the 4 reviws seem to be written by someone usising the same style.

[bigguyinpasadena]

Does anyone else get a smell coming of Scott Adlers reviews?I hope I'm wrong-as the kid is gorgeous-but at least 3 of the 4 reviws seem to be written by someone usising the same style.

[Guest ncm2169]

Well, here goes. Every time I dive into a discussion about Scott I get my head bitten off, by him and/or a moderator. x(

 

(Deej, I promise to be good here). ;-)

 

HEADS UP: I wish Scott nothing but the best and I've told him that over and over again privately and here on this Board. I'll return to that at the end of this post. :-)

 

This is the second time questions have been raised here about the authenticity of Scott's reviews. In the one today, there are at least 3 curious items even before you get to the body of the review:

 

1. In answer to the question, "Did he live up to what he promised?", the reviewer says, "No."

2. For height, the reviewer says, "5'5". All other reviewers say he's 5'10" or so.

3. For cut/uncut, the reviewer says, "Uncut." All other reviewers say he's cut.

 

OK. We've all seen reviews that have obvious typos, and these might very well be that innocent. On the other hand, it's interesting to speculate whether a fake reviewer might deliberately make those "mistakes." :o

 

I also find it coincidental that this reviewer takes great pains to emphasize that Scott doesn't/didn't write his own reviews, as this review was the first to appear since the last time questions were raised about his reviews' veracity. Draw your own conclusions.

 

He does, however, seem to be developing quite a following among educators, and fortunately they're getting more ethical. :7 (I'm personally waiting for a middle school horndog math teacher who's into early post-pubescent boys but who will, of course, ethically settle for an 18 y/o). :+

 

Like I say, draw your own conclusions about Scott's reviews' authenticity. :* Of eight reviews, six are by firstimers. Nothing wrong with that. I was recently a first time reviewer myself. I hired based on first time reviews and was VERY happy.

 

Finally, I am in contact with a member of this site whose integrity, IMHO, is unimpeachable. He tells me he had a WONDERFUL time with Scott.

 

From here it looks like, YES, some of Scott's reviews are questionable, and YES, he is worth hiring.

 

Good luck, Scott. :-)

[Guest ncm2169]

Well, here goes. Every time I dive into a discussion about Scott I get my head bitten off, by him and/or a moderator. x(

 

(Deej, I promise to be good here). ;-)

 

HEADS UP: I wish Scott nothing but the best and I've told him that over and over again privately and here on this Board. I'll return to that at the end of this post. :-)

 

This is the second time questions have been raised here about the authenticity of Scott's reviews. In the one today, there are at least 3 curious items even before you get to the body of the review:

 

1. In answer to the question, "Did he live up to what he promised?", the reviewer says, "No."

2. For height, the reviewer says, "5'5". All other reviewers say he's 5'10" or so.

3. For cut/uncut, the reviewer says, "Uncut." All other reviewers say he's cut.

 

OK. We've all seen reviews that have obvious typos, and these might very well be that innocent. On the other hand, it's interesting to speculate whether a fake reviewer might deliberately make those "mistakes." :o

 

I also find it coincidental that this reviewer takes great pains to emphasize that Scott doesn't/didn't write his own reviews, as this review was the first to appear since the last time questions were raised about his reviews' veracity. Draw your own conclusions.

 

He does, however, seem to be developing quite a following among educators, and fortunately they're getting more ethical. :7 (I'm personally waiting for a middle school horndog math teacher who's into early post-pubescent boys but who will, of course, ethically settle for an 18 y/o). :+

 

Like I say, draw your own conclusions about Scott's reviews' authenticity. :* Of eight reviews, six are by firstimers. Nothing wrong with that. I was recently a first time reviewer myself. I hired based on first time reviews and was VERY happy.

 

Finally, I am in contact with a member of this site whose integrity, IMHO, is unimpeachable. He tells me he had a WONDERFUL time with Scott.

 

From here it looks like, YES, some of Scott's reviews are questionable, and YES, he is worth hiring.

 

Good luck, Scott. :-)

[Uncle Bill]

I've met with Scott a couple of times (once socially and once for "business"), and my review of him should be posted soon -- I guess tha HooBoy is still catching up on the backlog, and there is the 10-day separation rule. Anyway, you'll see from that review that I had an absolutely great time with Scott and that I intend to see him again.

 

I completely understand the suspicions on this board about some of his reviews and the issue about his rates not being posted in any of the reviews (except for the overnight). I have used this site very successfully for over 3 years to help me sort out the guys (although I've only been posting on this board for about 9 months), and I had the same questions about Scott as many of you did. However, he was so cute, and I had some private information on him from another poster on this board, so I decided to contact him -- and I couldn't be happier that I did.

 

Regarding the rate issue, I discuss that in my review, but I'll say in summary that his rates are comparable to those that other good escorts charge for an evening (he charges by the session, and it depends on what you want to do, but he doesn't watch the clock at all, and the session with me included dinner, lots of private fun, and coffee afterwards). As for the reviews, in my view, he really is everything that they describe. I also believe that the last review (from the HS teacher) is on the up-and-up based on some things that happened and information I learned during my time with Scott (I won't go into the details on that, but I'm pretty sure that the reviewer is a real guy and that he had a great time with Scott).

 

From a purely selfish point of view, part of me hopes that all of you guys will stay away from Scott so that I don't have trouble getting time with him (he has a VERY busy schedule between school, work, escorting and trying to have a life). However, that's not what this site is about, and that wouldn't be fair to Scott. If he sounds like your type, email him and find out more about what he's like (be patient on email responses -- he's not always the fastest in responding, but your patience will be well rewarded). If you get along on email, he'll probably offer to meet you off the clock over coffee to get to know each other a little better (which was very enjoyable for me). After that, well, I had an evening that I won't forget for a very long time (and which I plan to repeat with him many more times). If you want more of a date-like experience rather than just a quickie, and you like very cute, young, versatile, affectionate and intelligent guys, I really don't think that you can go wrong with Scott.

 

Did Scott write any of his own reviews? I don't know for sure, and, at this point, I don't really care. I do know that he didn't write this message or my upcoming review on him.

[Uncle Bill]

I've met with Scott a couple of times (once socially and once for "business"), and my review of him should be posted soon -- I guess tha HooBoy is still catching up on the backlog, and there is the 10-day separation rule. Anyway, you'll see from that review that I had an absolutely great time with Scott and that I intend to see him again.

 

I completely understand the suspicions on this board about some of his reviews and the issue about his rates not being posted in any of the reviews (except for the overnight). I have used this site very successfully for over 3 years to help me sort out the guys (although I've only been posting on this board for about 9 months), and I had the same questions about Scott as many of you did. However, he was so cute, and I had some private information on him from another poster on this board, so I decided to contact him -- and I couldn't be happier that I did.

 

Regarding the rate issue, I discuss that in my review, but I'll say in summary that his rates are comparable to those that other good escorts charge for an evening (he charges by the session, and it depends on what you want to do, but he doesn't watch the clock at all, and the session with me included dinner, lots of private fun, and coffee afterwards). As for the reviews, in my view, he really is everything that they describe. I also believe that the last review (from the HS teacher) is on the up-and-up based on some things that happened and information I learned during my time with Scott (I won't go into the details on that, but I'm pretty sure that the reviewer is a real guy and that he had a great time with Scott).

 

From a purely selfish point of view, part of me hopes that all of you guys will stay away from Scott so that I don't have trouble getting time with him (he has a VERY busy schedule between school, work, escorting and trying to have a life). However, that's not what this site is about, and that wouldn't be fair to Scott. If he sounds like your type, email him and find out more about what he's like (be patient on email responses -- he's not always the fastest in responding, but your patience will be well rewarded). If you get along on email, he'll probably offer to meet you off the clock over coffee to get to know each other a little better (which was very enjoyable for me). After that, well, I had an evening that I won't forget for a very long time (and which I plan to repeat with him many more times). If you want more of a date-like experience rather than just a quickie, and you like very cute, young, versatile, affectionate and intelligent guys, I really don't think that you can go wrong with Scott.

 

Did Scott write any of his own reviews? I don't know for sure, and, at this point, I don't really care. I do know that he didn't write this message or my upcoming review on him.