Inquiring Minds. . .

[Guest fukamarine]

>>>hey f-marine, Let's get something straight before your

>>>dementia really kicks in. It was Taylor who called you

>the

>>>"RESIDENT IDIOT" when you posted under the name t-buns,

>>>REMEMBER? ...

>>

>>As a matter of fact - I don't. Why would I keep track of

>his

>>drivel?

>>

>>I'm certain Taylor will appreciate how you have

>>>chosen to use his "tell it like it is" descriptions. It's

>>a

>>>wonderful compliment to his great insight....

>>

>>You think?

>>

>>You must be an elderly shriveled up looser, lusting after

>a

>>20 year old twink whose IQ is only marginally greater than

>the

>>length of his dick.

>>

>

>>Nitey nite dear Cooper, and have a wonderful weekend.

>

>

>

>

>======================================================================

>thunderbuns,fuckamarine,or whatever other tags a cowardly punk

>like you hides behind......you showed how much of a lump of

>shit you really are by attacking cooper the way you did. coop

>has NEVER in any way said anything to me that would even

>remotely suggest he is interested in anything but my

>friendship.you hide behind the anonymity of a tag on a cyber

>board spewing your hatred of people that are more likey than

>not your betters, here you feel you have some importance

>,where you can project your manufactured image to people you

>don't have the balls to face.i'm sorry you spend your days

>having to ask people "do you want fries with that" over and

>over day after day, but as sad as that is it is no excuse to

>dump on decent people like coop.please for your own sanity get

>help,a job training program,or maybe some goverment funded

>mental health facility,or maybe a 12 step program,whatever you

>feel would be

>best.......taylorky@07:00-11/16/02......................oh by

>the way WTF is a henryj????????shalom:-) have a nice day and

>watch that hot grease

 

MY MY MY - such venom from such a sweet little guy! Feel better now?

Does your mommie know what you're doin'? Y'all have a good weekend now.

 

fukamarine

[Guest fukamarine]

>

>>Honey - you only WISH you were a fucked-marine. If your

>body

>>is as bizarre as you petite mind, no wonder you wish you

>could

>>get fucked. But don't give up - SOMEONE out there will

>>probably give you a charity hump!

>>

>>And if you choose not to believe me - that's perfectly OK

>>with me, Thunderbuns and whoever the fuck "STAN" may be.

>The

>>amount of sleep I will miss over that? Z E R O.

>>

>>Nitey nite dear Cooper, and have a wonderful weekend.

>>

>>fukamarine

>..............................................................................................................

>

>Hey T-buns, ALRIGHT, I'LL HUMOR YOU, F-BUNS, How many times

>must I tell you, that when writing a response to a message,

>stay FOCUSED on the issue and stop trying to attack the

>author. Your messages come across looking STUPID AND

>IMMATURE....I also find it amusing that you now have a picture

>of me in your mind, in fact, you're probably dreaming about me

>right now? AND, is that because you feel guilty about

>something?...Hey dude, WHATEVER TURNS YOU ON...

>

>So, before wacking off on your key-board and spitting out

>whatever comes to your demented mind, try to compose yourself,

>take a deep breath, and think about this. Why is it that

>Lucky, Taylor, and I all know that you are posting under a new

>name? Why is it that you continue to perpetuate your LIES. Is

>it that you are so obsessed with this message board that your

>lonely, loser life can only find happiness here? THAT'S REALLY

>SICK MAN.

>

>Another LIE of your's, which has raised many eyebrows around

>here, is your so called "THELMA and LOUISE" adventures. You

>informed us (to the delight of many) that you would be gone

>for over a month, but then, 2 weeks later, you're back

>spitting out senseless messages on every thread. What happened

>did your new "PINTO" break down?

>

>Finally, F-buns, you will make a great guest on the Jerry

>Springer Show. TOPIC: people with multiple-identity-disorders.

>

>You can be introduced as the man who has more user-names than

>bin laden has hiding places! Perhpas there, you will be able

>to find the professional help you truly need. REMEMBER,

>admitting that you have a problem is the first step to

>recovery...Then, of course, there is always the possibility of

>just telling the truth.

>

>WHATEVER F-BUNS, you are still a fucking liar! and that

>leaves you with NO CREDIBILITY on this board....OH, let me not

>forget to mention this to you, regarding Taylor, (since my

>mind is not perverted like your's) it is possible to make

>friends on this board. Unlike you, many of us have.

>

>................ "C :( P E R" .........

 

There there Cooper. Just calm down, take deep breaths and try and count to 10. You can do that, can't you? You and your hayseed pup have such poison in your veins and hatred in your heart that's it's a wonder you can function at all.

 

Do I care if you believe me? I'll let you guess the answer to that one!

 

As to whether I have any friends on this board? Well it may surprise you, but personal emails I receive from several members would discredit your assumption.

 

But the biggest puzzle of all is why do you even waste your time to spew out all your hatred. Surly you can put your time to better use. You say I need professional help? Could it be that it's is really you who needs help to get focused on what is important in life. I'm not important in your life - at least i shouldn't be. But as long as you stay fixated as to whether or not I have two identities, whether or not I am a liar, whether or not I need help - then you'll never get better yourself. Move on Cooper. Just ignore me. I won't go away, but there's no need for you to let me get under your skin. It ain't worth it Cooper - at least trust me on that one.

 

Your cyber buddy

 

fukamarine

[Guest fukamarine]

>

>>Honey - you only WISH you were a fucked-marine. If your

>body

>>is as bizarre as you petite mind, no wonder you wish you

>could

>>get fucked. But don't give up - SOMEONE out there will

>>probably give you a charity hump!

>>

>>And if you choose not to believe me - that's perfectly OK

>>with me, Thunderbuns and whoever the fuck "STAN" may be.

>The

>>amount of sleep I will miss over that? Z E R O.

>>

>>Nitey nite dear Cooper, and have a wonderful weekend.

>>

>>fukamarine

>..............................................................................................................

>

>Hey T-buns, ALRIGHT, I'LL HUMOR YOU, F-BUNS, How many times

>must I tell you, that when writing a response to a message,

>stay FOCUSED on the issue and stop trying to attack the

>author. Your messages come across looking STUPID AND

>IMMATURE....I also find it amusing that you now have a picture

>of me in your mind, in fact, you're probably dreaming about me

>right now? AND, is that because you feel guilty about

>something?...Hey dude, WHATEVER TURNS YOU ON...

>

>So, before wacking off on your key-board and spitting out

>whatever comes to your demented mind, try to compose yourself,

>take a deep breath, and think about this. Why is it that

>Lucky, Taylor, and I all know that you are posting under a new

>name? Why is it that you continue to perpetuate your LIES. Is

>it that you are so obsessed with this message board that your

>lonely, loser life can only find happiness here? THAT'S REALLY

>SICK MAN.

>

>Another LIE of your's, which has raised many eyebrows around

>here, is your so called "THELMA and LOUISE" adventures. You

>informed us (to the delight of many) that you would be gone

>for over a month, but then, 2 weeks later, you're back

>spitting out senseless messages on every thread. What happened

>did your new "PINTO" break down?

>

>Finally, F-buns, you will make a great guest on the Jerry

>Springer Show. TOPIC: people with multiple-identity-disorders.

>

>You can be introduced as the man who has more user-names than

>bin laden has hiding places! Perhpas there, you will be able

>to find the professional help you truly need. REMEMBER,

>admitting that you have a problem is the first step to

>recovery...Then, of course, there is always the possibility of

>just telling the truth.

>

>WHATEVER F-BUNS, you are still a fucking liar! and that

>leaves you with NO CREDIBILITY on this board....OH, let me not

>forget to mention this to you, regarding Taylor, (since my

>mind is not perverted like your's) it is possible to make

>friends on this board. Unlike you, many of us have.

>

>................ "C :( P E R" .........

 

There there Cooper. Just calm down, take deep breaths and try and count to 10. You can do that, can't you? You and your hayseed pup have such poison in your veins and hatred in your heart that's it's a wonder you can function at all.

 

Do I care if you believe me? I'll let you guess the answer to that one!

 

As to whether I have any friends on this board? Well it may surprise you, but personal emails I receive from several members would discredit your assumption.

 

But the biggest puzzle of all is why do you even waste your time to spew out all your hatred. Surly you can put your time to better use. You say I need professional help? Could it be that it's is really you who needs help to get focused on what is important in life. I'm not important in your life - at least i shouldn't be. But as long as you stay fixated as to whether or not I have two identities, whether or not I am a liar, whether or not I need help - then you'll never get better yourself. Move on Cooper. Just ignore me. I won't go away, but there's no need for you to let me get under your skin. It ain't worth it Cooper - at least trust me on that one.

 

Your cyber buddy

 

fukamarine

[Guest 7Zach]

well, for someone who complains about adrian, you sure can loop a thread to bring in Israel... he's got u going, huh?

[Guest 7Zach]

well, for someone who complains about adrian, you sure can loop a thread to bring in Israel... he's got u going, huh?

[Cooper]

You're right THUNDERBUNS, my work on this thread is complete. You've been red flagged, exposed for your lies, and have NO CREDIBILITY left on this board. So enjoy your imaginary friends and your pathetic life....Once again, truth and justice prevail.

[Cooper]

You're right THUNDERBUNS, my work on this thread is complete. You've been red flagged, exposed for your lies, and have NO CREDIBILITY left on this board. So enjoy your imaginary friends and your pathetic life....Once again, truth and justice prevail.

[Guest fukamarine]

>You're right THUNDERBUNS, my work on this thread is

>complete. You've been red flagged, exposed for your lies, and

>have NO CREDIBILITY left on this board. So enjoy your

>imaginary friends and your pathetic life....Once again, truth

>and justice prevail.

 

Just knew you would post again - you're so predictable.

But then, as the board's self-styled life style guru, detective extraordinaire and chronicler of public opinion, I guess you had no choice, did you!

 

Gosh, you must be sooooo busy these days with all that responsibility.

And to think it's a non-paying job too. Pity! Life just isn't fair, is it?

 

Now if you could only manage to pry your head out of your colon.

 

fukamarine

[Guest YFSC]

>I have never seen a post from ad rian containing any

>'nastiness.' If you know of any, please point it out.

 

Well, woodlawn, since you ask, how about these for openers, all from just last week, in the 5-day period before you wrote this comment?

______________________________________________________________

 

ad rian Sun Nov-10-02 11:45 AM

Member since May 11th 2002

229 posts, 1 votes, 2 points

#28330, "RE"

In response to Reply #0

 

I for one have no interest in an escort who is booking 12 guys a day for 2 hours each. There is no way he could possibly live up to his hype here.

<speaking of Bruno Gaucho, and castigating him for behaviour which is obviously impossible and invented by Adrian out of thin air solely for the purpose>

______________________________________________________________

 

ad rian Wed Nov-13-02 08:51 AM

Member since May 11th 2002

229 posts, 1 votes, 2 points

#28453, "RE: Today's (11/10)"

In response to Reply #51

 

For the umpteenth time, you idiot, ...

<speaking to me, when insisting against all evidence and against all reason "for the umpteenth time" that Bruno Gaucho's glowing review #2 is actually a negative one>

______________________________________________________________

 

ad rian Sat Nov-09-02 02:12 AM

Member since May 11th 2002

229 posts, 1 votes, 2 points

#28158, "RE: Appointments with Bruno Gaucho"

In response to Reply #0

 

I suspect he is helping him with more than just his English. I never thought of a pimp as a "friend" before, but then again I guess since he is helping with the English, he chose a nicer translation.

<speaking of Brazil Nut (?) or someone else who is helping Bruno Gaucho with his English, and calling him a pimp for doing so>

______________________________________________________________

 

ad rian Tue Nov-12-02 06:24 AM

Member since May 11th 2002

229 posts, 1 votes, 2 points

#28374, "RE: Appointments with Bruno Gaucho"

In response to Reply #21

 

I for one won't hire an around the clock whore who leaves his phone on and impresses people disinterested in sexual performance.

<speaking of Bruno Gaucho, and detailing the telltale signs of how to recognize an "around the clock whore">

______________________________________________________________

 

>I have seen plenty of posts from others containing personal

>attacks against him, including yours, to which he always

>replies without resorting to the same, and he is one of very

>few people here who can make that claim.

 

So the above, you think, do not contain any personal attacks? or nastiness?

[ad rian]

><speaking of Bruno Gaucho, and castigating him for behaviour

>which is obviously impossible and invented by Adrian out of

>thin air solely for the purpose>

 

Let's see now the guy's "handler" writes in and says that Bruno has been swamped with requests and his phonemail is filled and defends his two hour minimum and scheduling problems, can't I be permitted a little speculation, if not irony? Irony does not mean nasty necessarilly.

 

><speaking to me, when insisting against all evidence and

>against all reason "for the umpteenth time" that Bruno

>Gaucho's glowing review #2 is actually a negative one>

 

There you go again. I was repeatedly explaining why I perceived the phone being left on and the reviewer's self description as events which I would have regarded as negative had they involved me. The fact that you still fail to see the subtlety of this point and that I have nowhere described the reviews as negative, I think justifies my frustration with you here. How many times do I have to teach you logic?

 

><speaking of Brazil Nut (?) or someone else who is helping

>Bruno Gaucho with his English, and calling him a pimp for

>doing so>>______________________________________________________________

 

Well, have you got a better word for that? Funny, that the word "pimp" would have a nasty connotation to a user of an escort site?

 

 

><speaking of Bruno Gaucho, and detailing the telltale signs

>of how to recognize an "around the clock whore">

 

Bak to the top, read my first explanation.

 

>>I have seen plenty of posts from others containing

>personal

>>attacks against him, including yours, to which he always

>>replies without resorting to the same, and he is one of

>very

>>few people here who can make that claim.

 

Oh, now do you think that I have not been subjected to personal attacks here, or that I might not have been replying to a few? Look, hire the kid if you want, but I will continue to expose this unprecedented marketing campaign for what it is.

[Guest YFSC]

>><speaking of Bruno Gaucho, and castigating him for behaviour

>>which is obviously impossible and invented by Adrian out of

>>thin air solely for the purpose>

>

>Let's see now the guy's "handler" writes in and says that

>Bruno has been swamped with requests and his phonemail is

>filled and defends his two hour minimum and scheduling

>problems, can't I be permitted a little speculation, if not

>irony? Irony does not mean nasty necessarilly.

 

There you go again, Adrian, twisting, distorting and fabricating the Big Lie. So few words and so many misrepresentations:

That was posted by Bruno in the flesh, so to speak ;-), not by any "handler" (your term)

The post does not say anything about defending "his two-hour minimum and scheduling problems." It just talks about guidelines for email.

Swamped with requests and phonemail does not mean that he accepts all of it or even any of it as bookings. You have no idea of how much or how little he accepts -- or were you one of the ones that didn't get an appointment? Is that what this is all about?

That is not speculation, and it is not irony (go look in a dictionary). It is just nasty.

No, you can't be permitted "a little speculation," not when you insist on maintianing that "the phone didn't stop ringing" is to be taken absolutely literally and similar such nonsense.

 

>><speaking to me, when insisting against all evidence and

>>against all reason "for the umpteenth time" that Bruno

>>Gaucho's glowing review #2 is actually a negative one>

>

>There you go again.

 

Thanks, Adrian. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

 

> I was repeatedly explaining why I

>perceived the phone being left on and the reviewer's self

>description as events which I would have regarded as negative

>had they involved me. The fact that you still fail to see the

>subtlety of this point and that I have nowhere described the

>reviews as negative, I think justifies my frustration with you

>here.

 

No, you were repeatedly trying to claim that the review was negative, and yes you did characterize it as negative, more than once. I'm not going to waste time citing them here.

 

>How many times do I have to teach you logic?

 

That will be the day...

 

>><speaking of Brazil Nut (?) or someone else who is helping

>>Bruno Gaucho with his English, and calling him a pimp for

>>doing so

>

>Well, have you got a better word for that?

 

Yes, actually I do. It's called "friend", just like it said in the original before you tried to pervert it.

 

>><speaking of Bruno Gaucho, and detailing the telltale signs

>>of how to recognize an "around the clock whore">

>

>Bak to the top, read my first explanation.

 

As irrelevant and distorted here as it was there.

 

>>>I have seen plenty of posts from others containing personal

>>>attacks against him, including yours, to which he always

>>>replies without resorting to the same, and he is one of very

>>>few people here who can make that claim.

>

>Oh, now do you think that I have not been subjected to

>personal attacks here, or that I might not have been replying

>to a few?

 

Well, honey, and I thought you claimed to be a "careful reader".

That quote was from your admirer woodlawn, and he was defending you. And you chose to attack it because you thought it was from me.

 

Also, you missed the point entirely, or maybe just are trying to twist it into something else, as you have done so many times in your other answers. You can reply to anything you want. The post was not about whether you have the right to reply. woodlawn claimed "I have never seen a post from ad rian containing any 'nastiness.' If you know of any, please point it out." I was pointing out the nastiness. That has nothing to do with whether you can reply, it has to do with how you reply and with his claim of how you reply. I was just pointing out that his claim was wrong. And you have essentially tacitly admitted here that it was nastiness.

 

>Look, hire the kid if you want, but I will continue

>to expose this unprecedented marketing campaign for what it

>is.

 

You are entitled to try to do so, if that's the way you feel about it, and I never said you couldn't. But your posts should not distort and twist the facts. And in order to do that you do not have to trash the individual/s involved (no, don't try to claim that you never did that either, because you have already admitted to that in a post).

[ad rian]

>No, you were repeatedly trying to claim that the review was

>negative, and yes you did characterize it as negative,

>more than once. I'm not going to waste time citing them

>here.

 

Well, its all there in black and white for those who care to read it. I have conceded that the subjective intent of the reviewers might not have been negative, but the objective facts disclosed could be and would be interpretedd as negative by me if I were the reviewer. I can't make it any more simple for you. Sorry that you can't seem to understand that rather fundamental but admittedly subtle distinction.

 

>I was pointing out the nastiness. That has

>nothing to do with whether you can reply, it has to do

>with how you reply and with his claim of how you

>reply. I was just pointing out that his claim was

>wrong. And you have essentially tacitly admitted here that it

>was nastiness.

 

No such admission, just the opposite, but again any nastiness was in response to nastiness directed at me, not initiated by me.

 

>But your posts

>should not distort and twist the facts. And in order to do

>that you do not have to trash the individual/s involved

>(no, don't try to claim that you never did that either,

>because you have already admitted to that in a post).

 

Again, I don't know what motivates you and others here, but I will continue to expose this marketing campaign. I note again I would not hire an escort who: (1) was better looking than his sexual mechanics; (2) left his phone on during appointments; (3) let stand unrefuted a negative no-show review; and (4) has such a persistent team of PR enforcers for 6 months (other escorts here seem to manage to make out without that. So you disagree, that's your right. Spend your money on him.

[Guest YFSC]

>>No, you were repeatedly trying to claim that the review was

>>negative, and yes you did characterize it as negative,

>>more than once. I'm not going to waste time citing them

>>here.

>

>Well, its all there in black and white for those who care to

>read it. I have conceded that the subjective intent of the

>reviewers might not have been negative, but the objective

>facts disclosed could be and would be interpretedd as negative

>by me if I were the reviewer. I can't make it any more simple

>for you. Sorry that you can't seem to understand that rather

>fundamental but admittedly subtle distinction.

 

No, you are the one who doesn't understand. Or, rather, I think you do but you just don't want to admit it and are trying to weasel out of it. There is a big difference between "negative to you" and just "negative period." Throughout almost all of that "discussion" you were claiming that the review was negative. No qualifier. Only at the very end did you start to say that it was "negative to you." And, in fact, your own metaphor about apples and pears applied against your point. Just because you call it negative does not make it so.

 

>>I was pointing out the nastiness. That has

>>nothing to do with whether you can reply, it has to do

>>with how you reply and with his claim of how you

>>reply. I was just pointing out that his claim was

>>wrong. And you have essentially tacitly admitted here that it

>>was nastiness.

>

>No such admission, just the opposite, but again any nastiness

>was in response to nastiness directed at me, not initiated by

>me.

 

I notice that you do not dispute the main point (that his claim was wrong and I was showing it), just the ancillary comment at the end about your tacit admission. And guess what, babe. Right here again, in disputing my statement, you have affirmed it once more, claiming that the nastiness was only in response to nastiness directed at you.

Aside from that, your claim of response is patently false, at least in most of the cases I cited. While you might think that the nastiness directed towards me was in response for nastiness you think I directed at you (I disagree), the main nastiness that I cited was entirely gratuitous and was directed at Bruno Gaucho. Perhaps you could explain to us just what nastiness it was that Bruno directed at you. I would guess that Bruno is unaware of your very existence. How could he have directed any nastiness at you. Unless, maybe, did he cancel your appointment with him and you are getting back at him?

 

>>But your posts

>>should not distort and twist the facts. And in order to do

>>that you do not have to trash the individual/s involved

>>(no, don't try to claim that you never did that either,

>>because you have already admitted to that in a post).

>

>Again, I don't know what motivates you and others here, but I

>will continue to expose this marketing campaign.

 

You've done it all already. What more can you do? Why do you keep obsessing over it?

 

>I note again

>I would not hire an escort who: (1) was better looking than

>his sexual mechanics; (2) left his phone on during

>appointments; (3) let stand unrefuted a negative no-show

>review; and (4) has such a persistent team of PR enforcers for

>6 months

 

We know that already. Many times over. You have made your points. Now go home and hire someone else.

 

>(other escorts here seem to manage to make out

>without that.

 

Generally other escorts here also speak English well enough to say or write what they want, although it's very possible that some of the them from other countries are getting help with their English too but just aren't saying so and you don't know about it. Bruno was honest enough to say so. So your trumped-up marketing campaign comes down to the fact that he needs help with putting his words into English and he's honest about it. Big deal.

 

By the way, did you notice in the Escort Travels section (sure you did, you're such a "careful reader") that the advertisement (that's right - advertisement; that section is designed for advertising by escorts, and yes, Bruno advertises there, and yes, you include that in the advertising that you fault him for) - the current advertisement for Tamar Souza's trip was posted not by Tamar Souza, but by Talvin de Machio. Hmmmm. Must be something nefarious there. Talvin must be his "handler." I wonder how much his cut is.

 

>So you disagree, that's your right. Spend your

>money on him.

 

Guess what, honey. I can't afford him. And that's the truth. But that doesn't make me want to trash him. I can't afford a Lamborghini either, but it's a nice car.

[ad rian]

>And, in fact, your own metaphor

>about apples and pears applied against your point.

>Just because you call it negative does not make it so.

 

Again, I am just sharing my subjective impression based on the objective facts disclosed about Bruno on this site. If others interpret those facts differently, go out and rent him. I won't for the reasons stated.

 

>I notice that you do not dispute the main point (that his

>claim was wrong and I was showing it), just the ancillary

>comment at the end about your tacit admission. And guess

>what, babe. Right here again, in disputing my statement, you

>have affirmed it once more, claiming that the nastiness was

>only in response to nastiness directed at you.

 

No, it's called a conditional clause, go back and read what I wrote. I denied your comment in the first instance, and then said that any nastiness was responsive. Sorry, Charlie, I have not admitted your claim.

 

>While you might think

>that the nastiness directed towards me was in response for

>nastiness you think I directed at you (I disagree), the main

>nastiness that I cited was entirely gratuitous and was

>directed at Bruno Gaucho.

 

You are right on one point if Ihave been nasty to you, it has been simply responsive.

 

>Perhaps you could explain to us

>just what nastiness it was that Bruno directed at you.

 

None, to my knowledge, bt I don't know exactly what are his arrangements, financial or otherwise, with his facilitators who have been repeatedly nasty to me here. Also, I do not agree that I have directed anything more than irony not nastiness towards him.

 

>So your

>trumped-up marketing campaign comes down to the fact that he

>needs help with putting his words into English and he's honest

>about it. Big deal.

 

For 6 months of repeated threads and posts here? Hmmh?

 

>By the way, did you notice in the Escort Travels section

>(sure you did, you're such a "careful reader") that the

>advertisement (that's right - advertisement; that section is

>designed for advertising by escorts, and yes, Bruno

>advertises there, and yes, you include that in the advertising

>that you fault him for) -

 

Where have I done that? My objections have been to the posts in the Lounge, Delli, and South America lounges, although if I recall somebody else might have placed one on his behalf in the TRravel Lounge, and yes I would include that in the marketing campaign that I have critiqued here.

 

>Guess what, honey. I can't afford him. And that's the

>truth. But that doesn't make me want to trash him. I can't

>afford a Lamborghini either, but it's a nice car.

 

Well, I can afford him, but I am not impressed.