Escort responses on March 1

[CT Dick]

Having posted critiques of escort responses several times (see Kip O'Brien, most recently) it is only fair that I comment on three responses posted today:

 

In all three cases, the review was a first time poster. This is a red flag for me. (Kip's reviewer was a first-timer, too, but it was Kip's response that got my attention.)

 

Also, in all three cases, the escort handled the negative review well.

 

Dick Hunter in Tampa, Matt in London, and Scott #2 in Fort Lauderdale, I buy your replies and commend you for handling yourselves well.

 

Dick

[Guest regulation]

I must disagree. The response of Scott #2 - Fort Lauderdale makes two points. First, he will not have sex with a client who has not showered and clipped his toenails. Second, if he shows up for an appointment he expects to be paid in full whether his behavior satisfies the client or not.

 

When arranging an appointment with an escort, I always give him a chance to mention any requirements or ask any questions he may have -- though that is really his responsibility whether I bring it up or not. So far as I'm concerned, any requirements he decides not to mention are not part of our bargain. That includes a cancellation fee; if an escort normally charges such a fee I expect him to tell me that beforehand so that I can consider it when deciding whether to hire him. If he doesn't mention it beforehand, it isn't part of the bargain and I will not pay it. What Scott seems to be saying is that he expects to be able to charge such a fee whether or not he mentions it beforehand.

 

I can understand that an escort would prefer that his clients be clean. I'm not sure why he would care about the length of their toenails. In any case, an escort who has any particular requirements about the cleanliness or appearance of his clients needs to mention that beforehand as well, rather than simply assume that he and the client have the exact same standards. It's his responsibility to bring these things up, not the client's. If he fails to do so and the appointment goes badly for that reason, it's his own fault.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Is toesucking safe?

 

Like other sexual activities, toesucking can be dangerous, if not deadly, when the nails are not clipped. Fungal infections are not usually a problem, but if you have ever cut your tongue on a dangling toenail, you will understand why clipping is necessary.

[Guest Ant415]

RE: Is toesucking safe?

 

Dangling toenails, unless in the state of Florida, really are not a problem.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

RE: Is toesucking safe?

 

>Dangling toenails, unless in the state of Florida, really

>are not a problem.

 

Is that anything like a dangling participle?

 

Thunderbuns