Rentmen.eu vs rent.men

[DMonDude]

1 hour ago, Simon Suraci said:

Did a little experiment today uploading a naughty photo to my public gallery. It shows on my end when I am signed in that the photo is in my public gallery and visible. When I log out and view my ad, the naughty photo is blurred and when I click on it, the site prompts me to upgrade to view it. RM is deliberately showing advertisers one thing and clients another. I’m boycotting by not posting nudes until RM changes their policy.

I think that's because you were viewing while not signed into any account. A client account should still be able to see that public nude. I can see public nudes still, but if i log out of my free client account entirely, then that's when i see what you saw with the nudes all being blurred and i get a prompt to login/subscribe. But if you go in to create an account, you still have the option to just setup a free account. They're basically trying to get a new user to go right to make a paid account, but at least as of right now, if they make a free account they still can see the public nudes, but the new user doesn't know that of course. It's a sneaky tactic to point a new user to the paid tier on initial sign up by making them think nudes all require a Premium account even though they actually don't at the moment.

Not to say you shouldn't boycott or do whatever you're going to do, just sharing what i found is happening.

Edited October 9, 2025 by DMonDude

[+ mds1]

2 hours ago, Simon Suraci said:

Did a little experiment today uploading a naughty photo to my public gallery. It shows on my end when I am signed in that the photo is in my public gallery and visible. When I log out and view my ad, the naughty photo is blurred and when I click on it, the site prompts me to upgrade to view it. RM is deliberately showing advertisers one thing and clients another. I’m boycotting by not posting nudes until RM changes their policy.

I know one escort that put all of his pictures on a Twitter account (that he doesn’t use normally, he only created it for naughty pictures) and then he linked that Twitter to his ad. This might be a way around the issue, maybe? Not ideal, but it gets pictures to us clients for free.

[+ jimbosf]

8 hours ago, Simon Suraci said:

Unfortunately only a fraction of viewers will click through to visit a twitter or other social page or a business website. 

I am probably the odd person out...but I actually read the text on ads in addition to viewing the photos.  I always check the contact info of someone I am interested in to see if they have provided a twitter link in addition to their number.  

[sydneyboy]

On 9/7/2025 at 10:57 PM, Pensant said:

I’m not a fan of sites and businesses that changed things when things didn’t need changing, especially when the replacement is sub-par.

How true! The classic example is Planet Romeo. The “new” site is years old but for the life of me I have never been able to navigate it.