Jump to content

Dick the Hung Redneck is TAKING a LOAD Live!


Guest pay4tops
This topic is 8383 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Guest pay4tops

I heard today that nasty SF TOP guy, Dick the Hung Redneck, is gonna take a raw load up his reputedly virgin butt tomorrow (Monday, 7/2) night, live on his website at http://www.redneckcam.com.

This, if it comes off, will be a voyeurs delight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Fin Fang Foom

WHAT A SHOCK! It's a PAY site!

 

Do I smell an advertisement from a first time poster?

 

FFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jizzdepapi

pay4tops. who are you? i would think (hope) that the event you report will be damaging to Dick's career as an escort. are you for real or do you have an ax to grind and a hidden agenda? maybe you could have dick make a post as to the truthfulness of your report.

 

just a thought,

jizz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest pay4tops

No ax to grind. I heard it from Dick himself as a matter of fact. And to the other poster that was shocked by the fact Dick's is a pay site, Tell me of ONE escort that has a a live cam for FREE!

But, good idea about asking Dick to confirm everything. I'll get a hold of him and ask.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jizzdepapi

>...is gonna take a raw load up his reputedly virgin butt...

 

thanks, dick. now do i have this right? an escort is going to take an unprotected dick up his ass and then that dick is going to unload a "raw load" of cum? does this guy also bareback? have never been to barebacking site; couldn't stomach it.

 

this is so repulsive to me that my question re poster was really whether he is trying to hurt Dick's career. his previous reviews are irrelevant.

 

thanks,

jizz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

an escort is

>going to take an unprotected

>dick up his ass and

>then that dick is going

>to unload a "raw load"

>of cum? does this guy

>also bareback? have never been

>to barebacking site; couldn't stomach

>it.

 

Hi Jizz,

 

Dick does have an advertisement on a bareback site called "bareback central" (http://www.barebackcentral.net/escorts/

You will find his ad there under the name of Hung Redneck (from SF) once you click on the "bareback escorts" section. According to that ad, he is a bareback TOP. However I'm not sure whether the recent post about his taking a load live is real or not.

 

JT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DJPerez

jizz:

 

It's "Live & Learn" time. Does it shock that some escorts might CHOOSE to Bareback to make some $$$'s?

 

They're out there; there's a market requesting "raw" sex. There are small video companies making bareback videos that advertise in magazines like UNZIPPED Monthly. As amatter of fact, I dropped my subscription to UNZIPPED because I didn't want to put money into the support of such advertising.

 

Now that doesn't mean you have to patronize that escort or even bareback with him, if you don't want to. Just realise that there are some that are willing to bareback for whatever their reasons, and make your choices accordingly.

 

Peace & Pleasure!

 

DJP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sdmuscl4hire

Well at least he will know the day, time and who it was with, and have alot people watching him get his hiv injection : )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HungRedneck

BOYS BOYS BOYS!!

 

I heard there was a bit of a dust-up on here about me..and jeez..how you guys like to talk!

 

Simmer down everyone while I give you the real facts!

 

First, yes i AM Dick...the "Hung Redneck" the nationwide escort currently based in SF. You can see my reviews here on this site..all good..and all with the highest rating..(even tho i was left out of the 'escort of the year' lists every year)

 

Second, yes what pays4tops says is true..even though I have been known as a hardore no-limits top escort, I not only will be spreadin my legs for another dude tonite..but yes he will be shootin his jizz in my gut. And yes this is the first time this will have ever happened....EVER. To repeat: the Redneck is goin down! ALL the way down and bein a total fag..takin sperm up my butt..just like all the fag bottoms I have always admired! Those of you know me know that i LOVE guys who are man enough to be a fag for me.

 

Third, it will be viewable on my site http://www.HungRedneck.com tonite, Monday, July 2 at @830 pm pacific time. Keep in mind that since the sperm is goin in me..it wont be like a porno shoot where you can see it.

 

Now..to addresss some of your 'concerns' etc. While I certainly appreciate the concerns about my career and my health expressed by 'jizz' (whats with that name anyway?) and some of you others, but frankly its not really anyone's business but mine.

 

Pay Site:

Yeah..my new site requires a membership fee (a whopping 3 bux for the first 5 days, followed by 40 bux/month if you dont cancel). The 3 bux represents 1% of my hourly escort rate...so its a chance to 'hire' me for 99% off my normal rate. If this upsets you..please dont join...go buy a porno video for $75 bux.

 

Health:

As far as I can tell, we all still live in a 'free' country and the point of where we live is that every person gets to make his own choices about things that affect his life. If you are 'disgusted' by the thought of sex without condoms, you are certainly free to feel that way...and there is a simple solution: DONT DO IT!...but please save your 'disgust' for gay bashers, child rapists, serial killers and others who really deserve it. (The idea of covering a beautiful man cock with latex is kind of disgusting to me actually.)

 

Its my ass, my health and my decision. Even tho the guy who is gonna seed me tonite says he is neg, I fully accept that he may not be and I may spend the rest of my life on medication. MY CHOICE! I would appreciate it if yall kept the speculation on my status to a minimum. It seems to me its between me and the people I fuck...if you arent gonna be doin it with me..I dont see the relevance to you.

 

Career:

Since my new site went up, I have entered semi-retirement as an escort. Although I still say 'yes' every now and then to interesting proposals from clients, mostly I am no longer available for hire. And for those of you who really care, yes I have been working as a bareback top escort for quite a while...and yes..there is a market for it: guys are making choices for themselves. For the record I have ALWAYS left the safety decisions up to my clients..if a client doesnt specifically request condoms then he doesnt get one...but again ..it was ALWAYS the client's choice.

 

FINALLY: if seeing a big top guy get taken down and made to 'fag out' gets you off...by all means tune in to my site tonite to see it live. The top is a buddy who is big, muscular and hairy and is TOTALLY into being the first to seed me. He will also be spending the nite with me in his arms...finally giving me what I have been giving my clients for years: a hard man-fuck, some man-sperm in a gut, and big strong man arms to sleep in. ISNT IT ABOUT TIME?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jizzdepapi

deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

dick: to be honest, your self-serving response is indicative only of your greed in the face of the AIDS crisis and indifference to the state of other gay mens' health. i'm going to ignore your response and quote from a person who died of AIDS. her words seem significant to me and show concern for people infected with the AIDS virus and those who had already died unnecessarily.

 

jizz

 

p.s.: if you'd like to come back after your promoting-death-for-bucks cam tonight to discuss issues about violence and social justice in this country, i, and others, would be glad to share our personal activist experiences with you.

 

"A wealthy, well-connected hetero friend recently said to me, "I'm amazed that you guys haven't turned to terrorism-everybody's afraid of you anyway. Why not use that fear to save yourselves?" Make no mistake. This is what we're left with. If you choose to negotiate your life away with scum bags, fine. But I'm going out fighting. This is my message to everyone with AIDS: If you think the end is near, take someone with you. Hold the president of a drug company hostage. Splatter your blood across the desk of a politician. Trash an AIDS researcher's home. When some silly-assed, blow-dried, brain-dead TV reporter asks you a stupid question about living with AIDS, spit in his face. Call the police and tell them you've put LSD in the water supply in retaliation for our genocide. Do it so they'll know what it's like to have your life ripped apart.

 

"Unfortunately, we are a 'gentle, loving people.' Many of us lack the strength and conviction required for these brave actions. A friend of mine said the other day that as long as we were threatening a drug company, get him into its compassionate-use drug trial: 'I'm so tired of what we have to do to stay alive.' Me, too, baby. Me, too. But do it we must.

 

"To all you supportive HIV-negatives: I call on you to make this sacrifice as well. This is not just tough talk. I truly believe that the current state of AIDS will not change unless radical steps are taken immediately. If you don't believe me, then take a good, hard look at the war on cancer.

 

"Creating terror is not just screaming, making an artistic statement or getting in touch with your anger. True anger is not a flame. True anger is ice. True anger is calm and sure. It does not require legions of people to succeed. It requires determination as strong as steel. An act of terror can be large or small, innately personal or massively public. Let's use our queerest gift--creativity--to Do the Right Thing. I know some of you are shaking your heads as you read this. Many of you will no doubt shrug it off. Go ahead. But remember, I want to live. By any means necessary."

 

--Kiki Mason, “I am Someone with AIDS and I Want to Live by Any Means Necessary, POZ magazine, June-July, 1996

 

and here's the link: http://www.actupny.org/diva/CBnecessary.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DCescortBOY

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

how does murdering someone else lessen the tragedy of someone's own death?

if dick wants to be a bareback bottom, that's his choice. he's accepted the risks & takes responsibility for his actions.

splattering HIV-infected blood on somoeone, holding someone hostage, spitting on someone who hasn't expressly asked you to do so... these are ALL WRONG, regardless of the message you'd like to convey. "taking someone out with you" really doesn't accomplish anything; you still die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jizzdepapi

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

>how does murdering someone else lessen the tragedy of someone's own death?

 

kiki's point is that "someone" is an agent of a corporations/the U.S. government which have neglected their responsibility and have sometimes profiteered from the deaths of people with AIDS, not just any old "someone." a radical proposal but one not unheard of in the more grim circles of people dying of AIDS.

 

 

>if dick wants to be a bareback bottom, that's his choice. he's accepted the risks & takes responsibility for his actions.

 

has he taken responsibility for the people he has infected, and the people they have infected, etc., etc.? in some peoples' minds, he has committed murder. at least, he has certainly done damge to the efforts to educate people about safer sex.

 

 

>splattering HIV-infected blood on somoeone, holding someone hostage, spitting on someone who hasn't expressly asked you to do so... these are ALL WRONG, regardless of the message you'd like to convey. "taking someone out with you" really doesn't accomplish anything; you still die.

 

i don't think most AIDS activists really want to committ/see committed the acts described above. i do think they have always wanted, and many people dead of AIDS would have liked, to see corporations (pharmaceuticals, especially) and the U.S. government fully engaged in the battle to fight AIDS and prevent as many deaths as they could have, irrespective of the profit motive and political repurcusions. if a person's lover and/or circle of friends have died a horrible death from AIDS, a perosn might think differently about how to convey that message.

 

i think that's what this is all about and, in a limited way, describes the battle AIDS activists have waged for over 20 years.

 

profiteering by a bareback aficionado who WILL influence others in the deadliest sexual activities, as was the reluctance of bathhouse owners in the early 1980s to modify their activities pale in comparison to the number of past, present and future deaths due to AIDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

>how does murdering someone else lessen

>the tragedy of someone's own

>death?

>if dick wants to be a

>bareback bottom, that's his choice.

>he's accepted the risks &

>takes responsibility for his actions.

>

>splattering HIV-infected blood on somoeone, holding

>someone hostage, spitting on someone

>who hasn't expressly asked you

>to do so... these are

>ALL WRONG, regardless of the

>message you'd like to convey.

>"taking someone out with you"

>really doesn't accomplish anything; you

>still die.

 

Oh, where to begin??

 

I cannot imagine anyone who's alive today who was out and lived through the worst of the epidemic in the 80's taking this stance.

 

You say it's his choice, he's accepted the risks and is taking responsibility for his actions. To me, that's insane logic.

 

First, starting backwards, will he still take responsibility for his actions if and when he becomes sick? Will he pay all his own medical bills? Or will he expect insurance or the government to support him? On the simplest level, do you have any idea how much money it costs society -- meaning all of us -- to care for one HIV patient??

 

Do you have any idea how much pain will be suffered by that person's friends and family as they watch him get sick and die? Do you know that people are still dying, and not in small numbers? Do you know that infection rates in younger men are climbing??

 

I cannot imagine anyone who has cared for a dying HIV friend or family member accepting this kind of 'responsibility'.

 

And then while he says he is mostly retired, he is still escorting. And he says he only uses condoms if someone explicitly asks him to. So is he taking responsibility for them as well, if he infects them? What will he say to their parents, their friends, their lovers? "Sorry -- I didn't want to feel a condom???" "Sorry, I was too selfish to even take a minor precaution with the health of this person that I was having sex with?"

 

He talks about getting 'seeded' as if it's a romantic thing. He tries to make the whole thing sound alternatively macho and somehow adventurous/romantic (in the sleazy romance novel kind of way).

 

Well, getting HIV is not romantic, in any sense of the word. Becoming sick and dying is not macho and it isn't an adventure I would want to share with any more of my friends.

 

I've had too much experience with HIV. I've seen too much pain, too much suffering, too many beautiful men cut down, men who danced the dance brought to a point where they can't even walk to the bathroom alone. I've seen wonderful, intelligent, thoughtful men turned into zombies who couldn't complete even a single sentence any more. I've seen loving men be brought to a place where trying to make love was almost impossible and was always accompanied by guilt. I've seen out men brought back into a new, ugly closet. I've seen far too many friends die.

 

What he is doing, how he is doing it, how he is publicizing it, how he trying to make money off it, how he is trying to romanticize it, the kind of message he is sending to who knows how many possibly impressionable younger people -- it disgusts me. I see nothing good in it, nothing defensible in it. It disgusts me and I find it reprehensible.

 

At some very basic level, we all owe the people around us a certain amount of responsibility. There is a social compact that binds us together. We do not kill each other on dark streets even if we could. We do not rob each other even if the opportunity is presented. We do not purposefully harm one another. And we do not commit suicide to escape our lives.

 

But what he is doing is very possibly suicidal, very possibly robbing society of resources by purposely becoming infected with a dangerous disease that is very costly to treat, very possibly taking a step that will bring great pain to those who call him friend or brother or son, and quite possibly setting the stage for killing future clients by infecting them with this disease.

 

I see nothing to applaud here. And I see no applicable 'freedom of action' arguments that make these steps defensible. Anyone who doesn't understand should go find the quilt, wherever it is, and read a few thousand panels. Or go find an HIV shelter and listen to the stories. Look into the faces. Feel the pain. If that's not enough, go find the families, the lovers, the friends, the ones left behind. Ask them about their pain.

 

Then tell me how romantic HIV is.

 

Getting seeded indeed. I feel only disgust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jizzdepapi

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

jizz to BG: there is great love in all that you say.

 

thank you,

jizz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HungRedneck

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

JEEZ JEEZ JEEZ

 

guys you sound so fuckin self-righteous it makes me think this is a church...not an online whore house!! keep your preachin for the street boys

 

first and foremost...the entire foundation of this country is personal responsibility...and i take responsibility for all my actions..and i have NEVER forced anyone into a position he didnt want to be in the first place.

 

who the fuck am i to tell someone that even if he wants me raw he cant have me because i am 'taking responsibility' for HIM! how completely insulting is that to his whole being?? when im done with that maybe i should go out to the freeway and stop every car to see if they are wearing seatbelts!!

 

jeeeeeez. EVERYONE out there knows the score...personal choice is personal choice...u guys..can you say 'co-dependancy'...

 

for the record

i was a founding member of the aids prevention action league

i have buried both friends and lovers

and i fuckin KNEW kiki mason and HE was a GUY you ignorant fool and three times the man you are jizz....and he, i know for a FACT would have no problem with my behavior...HOW DARE YOU THROW HIS WORDS AT ME!!!!

 

wear your fuckin condoms and have your fuckin sex ...and live to be 100...did i say you shouldnt? but you can take your 'civic responsibility' and shove it up your tight assholes...and make sure you cover it with latex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

I'm still HIV neg. However, back in the days it was practically a death sentence, I would sometimes fantasize about, if I ever became HIVpos, getting a gun, learning to shoot well, and going about, in cold blood with ample premeditation and no remorse, taking out one of the conservative supreme court justices.

 

I think I understand the frustration and rage that the writer expresses . . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

>I'm still HIV neg. However,

>back in the days it

>was practically a death sentence

 

Stop right there boss. I will repeat this statistic one more time.

 

The number of HIV infections cured to date is EXACTLY ZERO.

 

It is *still* a death sentence. Modern treatments can prolong life, ihibit the virus, and sometimes let people appear to have "normal" lives for a while. (And those same medications can be hell on the patient.)

 

But the disease is still deadly, and still has no cure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Fin Fang Foom

How I long for the days when all we argued about was fashion.

 

Nostalgically yours ,

 

FFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jizzdepapi

Kiki would NOT have tuned in tonite!!

 

Redneck Dick:

 

I am sorry to hear that Kiki was a friend of yours. I had wanted to elevate the discussion a little so I found a piece on the internet that I thought raised the bar a little on this thread. Your reactionary response prodded me to research further. I found, as you know, that Kiki was a specialist in the area of Karposi's Sarcoma. I did find one pertinent piece regarding safer sex and prevention, though, which I have attached in its entirety. I have taken the liberty of typing key words in caps.

 

Sex Panic in NYC appears to be/have been an ad hoc group formed to resist attempts to shut down commercial sex establishments. The following piece was signed by a number of people, among them Kiki Mason. the document, as well as all signatures, are on the website.

 

 

A CALL FOR REAL HIV PREVENTION ACTIVISM

 

--Sex Panic, NYC, 1995 http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/Heights/5777/call.htm

 

We, the undersigned individuals, support the concept of community organization and activism to address the spread [of] the HIV disease in our communities. However, we reject the approach recently proposed by some community members to strictly enforce State regulation and close commercial sex establishments.

 

1. There are many different viewpoints in our communities about how to address the problem of rising HIV infection rates. All of them stem from a commitment to end the spread of HIV transmission. Self-appointed community members should not act as community police, forcing their particular solution onto the gay community, particularly without first engaging in a debate about our choices. The call for the closure of commercial sex establishments as an effective HIV prevention effort is not representative of the views of the gay and lesbian community.

2. State regulations that purportedly protect the public health do not differentiate between PROTECTED AND UNPROTECTED INTERCOURSE. Nor do those regulations define the significant differences in the DEGREE OF RISK between oral and anal sex. It is dangerous to invoke regulations that control our sexuality WITHOUT REGARD TO RISK FACTORS. It is even more dangerous to ask the State, through its enforcement mechanism - the Police Department -to enforce these over-inclusive regulations.

3. The closing of commercial sex establishments will not stop gay men from having anonymous sex. Anonymous sex is something that has been part of the lives of gay men for centuries. Whether or not one thinks this activity is "good" or "bad", it exists and is a very powerful force in the lives of many gay men of all ages and backgrounds. The closure of the bathhouses will not bring it to an end. Instead, the activity will move to the streets, parks, piers and alleyways where it will be much harder to provide HIV education and where we will be subject to further arrest and violence.

4. Rather than promote behavior change, the key to the success of HIV prevention efforts, the closure of commercial sex establishments stigmatizes behavior, making communication even harder than it already is. Discussing our attitudes and feelings about the kinds of sex we have and about how we deal with the ever-present risk of HIV infection is the most important thing we can do to stop the spread of HIV.

5. It is THE KIND OF SEX, not where it takes place, that creates a risk of HIV infection. There is much data that shows that it is in the bedroom where most risks are taken. The proposal to shut down commercial sex establishments does not address the real problem of sexual safety in out relationships and sustaining SAFER SEX throughout our sexual lives.

6. If one believes that it is in the interest of public health to prohibit gay sex (UNDIFFERENTIATED BY RISK FACTOR) in public, then why not prohibit gay sex in private as well, where the risk of transmission is even greater. Perhaps community members who advocate bathhouse closure would draw the line there. Unfortunately, the politicians that will use the statements of those advocates for their own vicious means, will draw no line at all.

7. Owners of commercial sex establishments, bars, clubs, and phone sex lines must be much more responsive to the needs of the communities from which they make their money. CONDOMS, lube, and/or information and referral must be free and available at all gay social establishments upon entry. Patrons should encourage CONDOM AND INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION and boycott those establishments that do not provide them.

8. Do not demonize gay men because of where we choose to have sex. Do not take away our ability to make choices for ourselves. Do not characterize gay men as victims who have no ability to control ourselves. It is important for us to have a dialogue about the role that sex plays in our lives and our community. Do not polarize the discussion before it even begins.

9. It is EVERYONE’S RESPONSBILITY TO BE A PREVENTION ACTIVIST, to create and implement strategies to stop the spread of HIV, to fight for funding for HIV prevention in gay and lesbian communities, and TO HAVE SEX SAFELY, well and often.

 

jizz

 

p.s.: interesting comments you sent on a personal level. thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DCescortBOY

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

LIFE is a death sentence. could someone please tell me ONE PERSON who was ever born who has not died, or will not die?

if you live, you die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DCescortBOY

RE: Kiki would NOT have tuned in tonite!!

 

if you're such the activist, why don't you know it is KAPOSI'S SARCOMA? there is no R in KAPOSI!

i'm sorry, but the self-righteous & vainglorious should be damned-near perfect if they insist on being sanctimonious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DCescortBOY

RE: deja vu. greedy bathouse owners, early 1980s

 

perhaps you can explain what role the SUPREME COURT plays in the fight against HIV???

 

<<in cold blood with ample premeditation and no remorse, taking out one of the conservative supreme court justices.>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...