Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Currently in San Diego… the pic on Masseurfinder looks AI-retouched or maybe even fully AI-generated.

He does have more realistic photos on his RentMen profile:
https://rentmen.eu/Turbook

image.thumb.png.4e15bbffbbde22101cdb0fe66dde735e.png

 

image.thumb.png.fe5034e1f7b73e3f3b4963cd885ba389.png

 

Below is a summary of previous comments and drama, on the link posted by @glutes

 Positive Reviews:

  • Multiple users reported positive in-person experiences, describing him as cute, sweet, polite, and looking exactly like his photos.

  • Sessions were said to be enjoyable, unhurried, and respectful, with some clients noting they would gladly see him again.

  • One user clarified that he’s more of a top, but willing to bottom if requested.

  • Some clients defended him, saying the deposit issue was a misunderstanding, and that he eventually refunded the money.


 

⚠️ Controversy:

  • A major dispute arose when DC Guy 92 accused him of a deposit scam, saying he was misled into sending $200 for a supposed trip that never happened.

  • DC said the masseur requested more money, then disputed the original payment, causing DC’s Venmo account to freeze.

  • Several users backed DC’s claims, calling it a deliberate scam and warning others not to send deposits, especially via non-refundable methods.

  • The masseur responded in a lengthy post, denying bad intent, blaming the dispute on miscommunication, ghosting clients, and Venmo mechanics.

  • He admitted he hadn’t bought a ticket and was waiting to secure more clients before committing to the trip.

  • After pressure, he issued a partial refund, then reversed it. Eventually, Venmo resolved the dispute in favor of the client.


 

🔄 Name Change & Fallout:

  • During the dispute, the masseur changed his Rent.Men username from Gringotuyoo to Turbook, prompting more skepticism.

  • Reactions to the name change were mixed: some saw it as a red flag, others as a reasonable attempt to escape negative attention.

  • The thread sparked a broader debate on escort ethics, client protections, and the risks of using deposits in unregulated services.

  • Ultimately, forum moderators closed the thread after the dispute was resolved.


 

💡 Takeaways:

  • Avoid sending deposits unless you’re sure of the provider’s reputation and payment method.

  • Misunderstandings over travel arrangements and communication style played a large role in escalating this dispute.

  • While some users still vouch for him, others view the situation as a serious trust violation.

  • This case became a cautionary tale for both clients and providers in handling money, expectations, and professionalism.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...