Legalities and texting etiquette

[Papua]

I'm a fairly new provider, and wondering how to best navigate the terrain of dealing with overt questions like "do you provide sensual/erotic" etc. I've looked through other posts on here and it seems some providers are being careful to not respond to these direct questions to avoid legal trouble. Yet at the same time, sites like rentmen or rentmasseur exist and they hide nothing about the nature of the business. 

I know jurisdiction varies by state, but are people really getting into trouble for providing a sensual massage? Or is law enforcement generally more concerned with human trafficking when it comes to sex work?

[Keenan]

Just be smart about how you respond.  Keep things vague if you can.  Never promise that you will do anything keeping in mind that the rate is for your "time".  A good client will understand your responses.  It depends on where you live how concerned law enforcement is but in more liberal states like NY, Maryland, etc... as long as you are smart about what you are doing they are more concerned about other types of crime.

[pubic_assistance]

3 hours ago, Papua said:

know jurisdiction varies by state, but are people really getting into trouble for providing a sensual massage? Or is law enforcement generally more concerned with human trafficking when it comes to sex work?

Human trafficking laws can be used in a variety of ways depending on jurisdiction and political campaigns. Since your data is now being stored by organizations like META and completely accessible by law enforcement, especially CIA ...it's absolutely advisable to NEVER directly discuss sex in exchange for money, at any point in time or any location.

You can discuss fees for your time.

You can discuss your sexual INTERESTS

You can discuss the interests that you SHARE with a customer.

You should keep all these conversations as separate.

You should NOT have a documented conversation with a customer where you say: "I will fuck you up the ass and cum in your mouth for $500" .

 

Edited January 25 by pubic_assistance
grammar