Jump to content
This topic is 804 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I observed a particular msg board sitch where the account of a poster was called into question as far as its veracity.

A “challenge” was thrown in by Player 1, oddly very attentive in following the material of a poster while criticizing such material as attention-seeking, such that the poster could be cast as adding more details to the narrative already construed as gossip, or maintain status quo, the net option thereby maintaining tittle-tattle status or maintaining withholder status. 

An inadvertent paradoxical prescription is not that uncommonly lobbed by trolls and bad relations alike.

I think that there are better ways to engage for the sake of information-seeking, whether that desire ranges from well-intentioned to voyeuristic.

Player 2’s best conceived counter paradox? I think it’s the prescription “Don’t pay attention to me.” That’s the one I think I’d go for. I think it could be then declared: And … match.

I think it would be at least as effective as the over-embellished more snitty less clean directive “Pay servile attention to me.” 😉😏

Edited by SirBillybob
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...