Clients Are You Embarassed

[Guest regulation]

>It's all a matter of context and judgment. I think

>"Regulation" is a brittle, obnoxious and self-hating

>homosexual. But then, as Dennis Miller would put it, that's

>just my opinion and I might be wrong.

 

I'm afraid the truth is much, much worse. The truth is that I often waste my time trading pointless insults with pathetic old queens left over from the Disco Era like you. If any of the real human beings I know ever found out about that, it would embarrass me totally.

[Guest Willy]

>I guess there's no need for you to worry about whether

>they're infected, then. Too late for that, eh? :-)

 

What a bizarre comment. Not for the subject matter, but for the manner of phrasing and the context.

 

>Ummmm . . . except that there's no such thing as 'the

>generic,' that's a wonderfully clever argument.

 

You must not hang out in ordinary grocery stores, then. They are chock full of generic products.

 

>Hmmmmm . . . I don't know. People like you who get angry

>and nasty when anyone says something uncomplimentary about

>hookers obviously have a lot invested in maintaining a

>rose-coloured image of the whole thing.

 

I'm neither angry nor nasty, nor do I have a "rose colored image" of rental meat.

 

>Let's just say they are not quite on the same level as

>Burton's Arabian Nights or the Kamasutra and leave it at

>that.

 

Who's looking for great literature? As I wrote quite a while back, hiring an escort is about getting a hug, a squirt and some B-grade community theatre. You won't tell us why you like escorts, but you sure seem to hate 'em ... along with yourself for needing them.

 

>So that means when you said convicted whores don't need to

>register as sex offenders you didn't know what the hell you

>were talking about. That comes as quite a shock. Well,

>perhaps not. :-)

 

I've never heard of escorts having to register as sex offenders. I thought that was for child molesters and rapists. Do you have different information? You seem to know a lot more about the subject than I do. Why is that, by the way?

[Guest Willy]

>I don't think I give a shit what you and the other members

>of the nelly brigade think. Just remember, it isn't

>ourselves that the rest of us hate, it's you. :-)

 

"The rest of us?" Reg, the only "ones" who hate me is you, including all the new personalities you've invented. What is this, The Three Faces of Regulation?

[Guest delhi]

>What a bizarre comment. Not for the subject matter, but for

>the manner of phrasing and the context.

 

What a stupid thing for you to say! If you are going to proudly proclaim to the world that you swallow, you mustn't complain if people draw the logical conclusion. :-)

 

>You must not hang out in ordinary grocery stores, then. They

>are chock full of generic products.

 

Give us the name of a popular 'generic' laundry detergent then.

 

>

>>Hmmmmm . . . I don't know. People like you who get angry

>>and nasty when anyone says something uncomplimentary about

>>hookers obviously have a lot invested in maintaining a

>>rose-coloured image of the whole thing.

>

>I'm neither angry nor nasty, nor do I have a "rose colored

>image" of rental meat.

 

Lying about the angry, nasty words in your posts in this thread won't change what is written on the board for all to see.

 

>Who's looking for great literature? As I wrote quite a while

>back, hiring an escort is about getting a hug, a squirt and

>some B-grade community theatre. You won't tell us why you

>like escorts, but you sure seem to hate 'em ... along with

>yourself for needing them.

 

Is this what you thought your life would be? Yelling ludicrous accusations at total strangers on a message board and writing fourth-rate porn to cover your rage at the fact you have to pay someone to get your member up? When you were young did you look forward to being the foul-tempered old poof you are today?

 

>I've never heard of escorts having to register as sex

>offenders. I thought that was for child molesters and

>rapists. Do you have different information? You seem to know

>a lot more about the subject than I do. Why is that, by the

>way?

 

You lied and said something was true when the truth is you have no idea whether it's true or not. I'm not so dishonest as to do that, nor am I so lazy that I would remain in ignorance of laws that could affect me when I can learn all about them by leafing through a couple of books.

[Guest Willy]

>Give us the name of a popular 'generic' laundry detergent

>then.

 

Sheesh, are you really this dumb? This is my point. Very little laundry detergent is sold generically. This is why it's not completely a commodity. I don't buy detergent, I buy Arm & Hammer detergent. The branding introduces some level of differentiation, slight as it may be.

 

If you want to see commodities at the grocery store, take a walk over to the produce section, the meat counter and, in purest form, the lobster tank.

 

>Lying about the angry, nasty words in your posts in this

>thread won't change what is written on the board for all to

>see.

 

I'm not angry with you and I'm not lying. My attitude is part amusement, part pity and part fascination of the kind normally associated with accidents on the highway. You're a sad, bitter individual. I've only said what needs to be said here.

 

>Is this what you thought your life would be? Yelling

>ludicrous accusations at total strangers on a message board

 

Let us consider the other things you've written. You consider escorts less than human -- commodities not people, "whoremongers," liars.

 

You disdain the customers. They are weird and deluded, all the more so when they enjoy (and, God forbid describe) the services they buy and indicate respect for those who provide them. You consider the trade in temporary companionship "dehumanizing." You insert a smiling icon next to a reference to disease. (I'll admit that one began to make me mad, given that I've bured friends.) Yet you hire escorts yourself, exposing yourself to disease just as I do. Would you smile if you contracted HIV?

 

Is is ludicrous of me to think that you, "Regulation," are a twisted and deeply conflicted guy, tortured by his homosexuality? I don't think so. In fact, I think I've nailed you. I've got your number, and I think you know it, which accounts for your increasingly brittle and hysterical responses.

 

Funny thing is, I'd be surprised if you're really this whacked out in real life. I'd wager that what's happened here is you've verbally painted yourself into a corner and don't quite know how to get out. For my part, since this is a virtual exchange, I'm having a lot of fun watching the behavior of a trapped rat. I feel no guilt because this is harmless and either of us can leave at will. In that sense, it recalls the mental institution in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. We are voluntary patients here ...

 

Keep it up, "Regulation." Let's see how you get out of this maze. Let me give you a hint: Say uncle