Only Fans/Just for Fans: the good and bad ones

[tarquinius]

I'm curious what you guys who subscribe define as a "good" site. What gets your attention?

The good sites give content of full sessions -- like 20 or 30 minutes long -- as opposed to only "promos" of a minute or just a few seconds for which you are supposed to pay again to see the full thing. This ruse is a ripoff and defeats the purpose of a subscription. I check to see how many videos a guy has posted and then scroll down to see how long they are. I prefer it if there are brief legends saying who is involved. In other words if I'm paying for it, I want to know who is in it and whether they are full scenes or not. I don't think that is too much to expect.

What is curious to me is that some guys have on OF or JFF site that has a lot of long, good content that is frequently added to. Where as some are, what I consider to be scams: short promos, not many videos, not many partners.

THe other thing is quality. Sometimes there's content of interest but so poorly shot you can't really see it. Poor lighting, shakey telephone camera, bad sound. I HATE music being played instead of letting me hear what is going on.

I listed the good sites imo, and the disappointing ones. I haven't tried yours yet, but I will if you think I'd like it.

[tarquinius]

Sorry, I forgot to reply. He is LipeScorpion. (@ScorpionLipe)

 

Rhy

[tarquinius]

Rhyheim seems to be posting still. His content is very well shot, usually by a third party, so much better than a guy with a phone trying to have sex and film at the same time. My only complaint is that he often uses loud music that covers the sounds of the sex and what the guys are saying. Sound is an important part of the sexual experience, and the music is annoying. But he doesn't always do this. He is an amazing performer, and I hope he will post video with LipeScorpion who looks incredible.

[+ TylerandAce]

The good sites give content of full sessions -- like 20 or 30 minutes long -- as opposed to only "promos" of a minute or just a few seconds for which you are supposed to pay again to see the full thing. This ruse is a ripoff and defeats the purpose of a subscription. I check to see how many videos a guy has posted and then scroll down to see how long they are. I prefer it if there are brief legends saying who is involved. In other words if I'm paying for it, I want to know who is in it and whether they are full scenes or not. I don't think that is too much to expect.

What is curious to me is that some guys have on OF or JFF site that has a lot of long, good content that is frequently added to. Where as some are, what I consider to be scams: short promos, not many videos, not many partners.

THe other thing is quality. Sometimes there's content of interest but so poorly shot you can't really see it. Poor lighting, shakey telephone camera, bad sound. I HATE music being played instead of letting me hear what is going on.

I listed the good sites imo, and the disappointing ones. I haven't tried yours yet, but I will if you think I'd like it.

Thanks fir the feedback. You’re describing what we do on ours, so I’m glad we align. We hate the bait-and-switch concept where you pay twice. That seems disingenuous. We also try to give lots of long play (12-30 minutes) and shorter (2-8 minutes) to mix it up. Lots of Porn hookups and newbies. It’s pretty much just our lives. So, sure I think you’d like it, but I wasn’t soliciting subscribers. It’s just nice to know where guys heads are in this new world of exhibitionism! ??