Jump to content

Is he for real!?!??!?!?! Manitoudavid in LA


TooSchoolForCool
This topic is 1297 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

He's frozen his membership. You can't contact him at this time.

 

~Boomer~

Then we definitely scare "them". The scheme group must have decided to freeze that profile until we lose interest and forget about him then change pictures, description and everything and pop-up back in L.A. in the future. I would strongly suggest that someone buddy-lists them and follow-up closely as I smell some serious shit, probably something beyond just a $cam, hopefully nothing that puts clients in danger.

 

In order to erase all traces "they" even removed the profile of the client that had reviewed the other "Latin Escorts": https://rent.men/Dbcammarata

This other profile is the one that gave a 5-star review today: https://rent.men/TorresSA

 

These are other Escort profiles that were reviewed by either Dbcammarata or TorresSA, besides https://rent.men/Phanto

It doesn't necessarily mean that they are directly involved, but just in case:

https://rent.men/Alvarousa

https://rent.men/Datilobf

https://rent.men/RCummings

https://rent.men/CubanXLmacho

Edited by orville
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There is a one-star review on RM now which states photos are not accurate.

The review states that the escort got $300 for doing very little. The review also states that the photos are fake.

Which is still very fishy and probably submitted just to make us think it's just a guy with fake pics:

1. That reviewer https://rent.men/magicmaker submitted this review in the US, with text?

2. All the other escorts Magicmaker has reviewed up until August are located in FL, and now he magically reviews an escort in L.A?

3. Magicmaker is a Bottom and his review mentions that he was sucked?

Edited by orville
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is still very fishy and probably submitted just to make us think it's just a guy with fake pics:

1. That reviewer https://rent.men/magicmaker submitted this review in the US, with text?

2. All the other escorts Magicmaker has reviewed up until August are located in FL, and now he magically reviews an escort in L.A?

3. Magicmaker is a Bottom and his review mentions that he was sucked?

 

Interesting. #2 makes sense. does #3 presume that bottom guys generally do not prefer receiving oral?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. #2 makes sense. does #3 presume that bottom guys generally do not prefer receiving oral?

Hi Apprentice who joined this Forum last Saturday. I think there are too many red flags right now for you to try making a point in favor of this scammer.

Edited by orville
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Apprentice who joined this Forum last Saturday. I think there are too many red flags right now for you to try making a point in favor of this scammer.

 

we were all new here at some point (including you just a few months ago!)......though the forum has somewhat of a tradition of newbie suspicion, your melodramatic underlined comment and seeming belittlement of an "apprentice" (that designation is out of his control) aren't helpful....let's see how the newbie does, instead......admittedly, this provider is almost certainly a crook, but Joe's observation that bottoms might also like to receive oral is not an endorsement of the crooked provider - or the reviewer!

Edited by azdr0710
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we were all new here at some point (including you just a few months ago!)......though the forum has somewhat of a tradition of newbie suspicion, your melodramatic underlined comment and seeming belittlement of an "apprentice" (that designation is out of his control) aren't helpful....let's see how the newbie does, instead......admittedly, this provider is almost certainly a crook, but Joe's observation that bottoms might also like to receive oral is not an endorsement of the crooked provider - or the reviewer!

His observation was clearly undue, out of the discussion, and appeared as if played in defense of the scammer, even more, when there are already 3 pages detailing the situation. I'm not melodramatic, I'm upfront.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...