Jump to content

Craigs List in Connecticut


CT Dick
 Share

This topic is 5298 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

This morning's news has a report of our attorney general calling for Craigs List to stop carrying ads for prostitutes. He says they have explicit pix, offers of sex, and rates per hour.

 

Now might be a good time to avoid Craigs List in Connecticut.

 

Dick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest josephga

I have noticed now when posting in the erotic section you have to open an account with the site and get a verification number thats sent to you by phone. then the first time you log in to post you have to enter that verification number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't these idiots have something better to do? I mean, I know it's illegal. I understand that. But where is the crime here? If someone wants to sell their body for sex and someone wants to buy it ... so freakin' what?

 

I will never understand the amount of law enforcement time and resources spent on this kind of thing.

 

And the thing about Craig's List is ... it's one of the few places you can find some gems who are not $300 per hour pros. That, and occasionally, manhunt and adam4adam.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest zipperzone

>Don't these idiots have something better to do? I mean, I

>know it's illegal. I understand that. But where is the crime

>here? If someone wants to sell their body for sex and someone

>wants to buy it ... so freakin' what?

>

>I will never understand the amount of law enforcement time and

>resources spent on this kind of thing.

 

Before you can even hope to understand it, you must firstly understand the small deranged minds of the right wing conservative so-called Christian nutjobs who are the cause of these archaic laws still being on the books.

 

That sir, is no easy task!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>But where is the crime here?

 

Since Spitzer, the press has been full of answers to that question. FEMALE prostitutes are often under aged, coerced, kidnapped, addicted, etc. And, they are regularly abused/beaten. Women working in the thousand dollar bracket are a rare exception. Even liberal Amsterdam is working to trim its red light district.

 

I have seen no mention in all these articles of MALE prostitution. This side of the profession seems to be pretty crime free (other than that obvious technicality).

 

It appears that the authorities don't see the difference.

 

Dick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ncm2169

< I have seen no mention in all these articles of MALE prostitution.

 

An old friend of mine from high school is a nationally prominent First Amendment attorney whose practice for over 30 years has centered on defense of "Adult Activities" in all kinds of venues. He and I recently had lunch and I asked him why it seems that male prostitute raids and stings are far less common than female raids and stings (notwithstanding the sting that caught Jeff in Ohio here and the fairly recent Las Vegas Craig's List sting). He answered quickly, "Because it's hard to get male cops to put themselves in a sexual situation involving another male."

 

Makes sense to me. :7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're joking right? The toughest prostitution law in the nation was proposed by liberals in New York State and signed into law by Eliot Spitzer.

 

Yep, just a bunch of right wing nuts.

 

The biggest activists against prostitution in this country today are the far left wing, feminist bitches who think that prostitution victimizes women.

 

You really are ill-informed on a whole range of subjects, aren't you?

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>You're joking right? The toughest prostitution law in the

>nation was proposed by liberals in New York State and signed

>into law by Eliot Spitzer.

>

>Yep, just a bunch of right wing nuts.

>

>The biggest activists against prostitution in this country

>today are the far left wing, feminist bitches who think that

>prostitution victimizes women.

>

>You really are ill-informed on a whole range of subjects,

>aren't you?

>

>Mark

 

Porn and Prostitution are two things that liberals and conservatives come together on. Truth be told they both agree that if porn and prostitution were both gone the world would be a better place.

 

John Ashcorft hired ~40 Forensic investigators to cull through all of the porn sites and look for 2257 violations in an attempt to bring the industry to it's knees. That is one hell of a waste of tax payer's money. John Ashcroft would hardly be considered a liberal.

 

Mark, I hope you don't miss John Ashcroft. The Free Speech Coalition surely does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest josephga

ncm thats what they said on the local news here too that male cops arnt comfortable being in sexual situations with men so the bust are rare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Porn and Prostitution are two different things. There is a whole range of porn that is -- and should be -- illegal. I have no problem with that at all.

 

On prostitution, it is the far left crazy feminist bitches who are causing these laws to stay on the books and insisting on new laws that go after the "johns." I'm just grateful they don't give a shit about male prostitution.

 

Anyone who doesn't realize those facts is just playing with their partisan-tinted glasses, that's all.

 

It's easy to blame the right for everything but that doesn't require any thinking which I realize is easier.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest zipperzone

>You're joking right? The toughest prostitution law in the

>nation was proposed by liberals in New York State and signed

>into law by Eliot Spitzer.

>

>Yep, just a bunch of right wing nuts.

>

>The biggest activists against prostitution in this country

>today are the far left wing, feminist bitches who think that

>prostitution victimizes women.

>

>You really are ill-informed on a whole range of subjects,

>aren't you?

>

>Mark

 

You know Mark, I really tried hard to like you (I'm sure you cauld care less) but I think I'll abandon the effort - one can only beat one's head against a brick wall for so long.

 

If two people have a differance of opinion and wish to debate the point, that's healthy and constructive. But with you, if someone has a different opinion than yours, your reply always contains some kind of put-down in you superior smug way.

 

FYI - No I wasn't joking. It is the relisious crazies who drive the anti prostitution laws in this country. You may also be right when you state that it is the far left feminist bitches who are the driving force. Perhaps there are even more groups who are involved - who knows? But don't tell me I must be joking just because my opinion is differnt from yours.

 

And as to your smart-assed remark that I really am ill-informed on a whole range of subjects.... take a look in the mirror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who don't know how to have an argument or a debate often resort to this sort of post.

 

You got your facts wrong on Anderson Cooper, Thomas Roberts, Bill Hemmer, Rob Marciano and a host of others.

 

But, somehow, I'm to blame.

 

Why don't you step up, admit your mistakes, and be a man.

 

And, no, I don't care whether you like me or not. Why should I? This is the internet. I don't even know you. People who worry about stuff like that on forums like this really should have their heads examined.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cited two specific examples of far left nuts who are driving the anti-prostitution laws. Why don't you provide two examples of recents laws where the right is driving the anti-prostitution bandwagon?

 

Wouldn't that be a better way of showing that you are correct in your assertions rather than just act like a two year old?

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest zipperzone

>People who don't know how to have an argument or a debate

>often resort to this sort of post.

>

>You got your facts wrong on Anderson Cooper, Thomas Roberts,

>Bill Hemmer, Rob Marciano and a host of others.

>

>But, somehow, I'm to blame.

 

Well now - who would dare to argue with the deluded COUSIN of Anderson Cooper?

 

You haven't addressed the You Tube video where he admits to being gay.

What's the matter - cat's got your tongue?

 

>And, no, I don't care whether you like me or not.

 

Of course you don't - you probably don't give a shit if anybody likes you. With your bloated ego, all you need is yourself - and no doubt, your COUSIN Anderson. I've heard plenty of crap in my day but that one really takes the cake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...