Providers who request a pic

[Guest europeanman]

The point you are missing that in addition to a photo, this photo is attached to potentially explicit text as well. I'm pretty sure that most are more worried about that considering a picture is worthless without context.

so it is not the photo per se but the fucking law. so feel free to send photos you are already fucked up ??

[coriolis888]

The point you are missing that in addition to a photo, this photo is attached to potentially explicit text as well. I'm pretty sure that most are more worried about that considering a picture is worthless without context.

 

 

You connected the dots - thank you

[coriolis888]

 

With all of your concerns about potential blackmail, I wonder whether you actually participate in this hobby.

 

 

What an odd conclusion.

 

"All your concerns about potential blackmail"

 

Early on, I mentioned that I am aware of a client who was the target of a provider who is currently in jail for attempted extortion.

 

From that, you leaped to wonder if I "participate in this hobby"

 

It is a good idea to read associated posts before making an incorrect conjecture.

Edited December 9, 2019 by coriolis888

[Chad Constantine]

so it is not the photo per se but the law. so feel free to send photos you are already messed up ??

 

lol

 

[+ oldNbusted]

I try to understand but still not get it.

 

Your not understanding it is not my problem. An intelligent person would then take my word for it that their particular situation does not apply to me. Think about it.

[former lurker]

I’m guessing a real cop wouldn’t bother sending a fake photo or real photo of himself. I’m not a legal expert, but I’m assuming there are regulations/policies that prevent cops from sending fake pictures or even real pictures to lure escorts, or on the other side, lure clients. I mean, wouldn’t it be illegal for a cop to get someone’s picture off the internet and send it to an escort saying that it’s his own?

 

Nope. Nothing in the law prevents police from misrepresenting who they are, or even outright lying.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Nope. Nothing in the law prevents police from misrepresenting who they are, or even outright lying.

 

Yep.

 

Which brings me to how useless those 'for my time only' disclaimers are that some escorts repeatedly use when corresponding or in their advertising: It won't help you a bit with a pandering or solicitation charge.

 

A good attorney is a wonderful thing

Edited December 9, 2019 by Benjamin_Nicholas

[Guest europeanman]

Your not understanding it is not my problem. An intelligent person would then take my word for it that their particular situation does not apply to me. Think about it.

@oldNbusted also manners and civility do not apply to you.

[+ oldNbusted]

@oldNbusted also manners and civility do not apply to you.

 

You get what you give.

[big dale]

Nope. Nothing in the law prevents police from misrepresenting who they are, or even outright lying.

People watch too much television. Thanks for posting some reality.

[AceHardware]

Nope. Nothing in the law prevents police from misrepresenting who they are, or even outright lying.

 

I had a rude awakening to this reality many years ago. Friend from college became a detective. We reconnected after a decade, talked about our jobs, I asked about his, he told me about busting a drug dealer by bringing the dealer's wife in for questioning and telling her they'd been monitoring the dealer, and he'd been having an affair. Would she like to testify against him? She was furious and gave them testimony right there. But, he told me, they invented the affair. I was horrified, but he said it was business as usual. I'm not anti-police, but I really have an ethical problem with that and still do. (Yes, we're still friends.)