What's that smell?

[twinkboylover28]

RE: What's that smell? Guilt, low self-esteem? Probably.

 

>"you cant blame me for assuming it was

>directed at me"

>

>Sure I can. If you did the assuming then the blame is yours.

>But I've learned not to expect much personal responsibility

>from men in denial.

 

 

Over-sensitive drama queen?

 

You get this pissy because, God forbid, one of your post is so ambiguous that anyone could easily misinterpret whom it was directed towards?... the horror!

 

Right. I'm in "denial", have "low self-esteem", and im full of "guilt"...plus im changing my name to" menance to society" next week.

[twinkboylover28]

>>Do you speak like that to all your patients...doctor?

>

>Hopefully that's exactly how he talks to his patients.

>

>

>Barry

 

 

He wont have many patients left with that judgmental ,condescending attitude, and I don't know many others who would dare put up with it either.

[bigguyinpasadena]

>I guess I'm just a stupid loser. That's what I get for

>sharing.

'nuff said! }(

[+ Tom Isern]

RE: See What Happens When...

 

Boston Guy,

 

You are always a thoughtful correspondent. Thanks.

 

I have promised to find more recent statistics and I will do so…I’ve been distracted the last couple of days and my HIV-professional friend is out of town, but I will get to it.

 

I believe that accurate information in HIV prevention is never a disservice. And I never did imply or state that “all the risks are about the same.” The statistics seem to indicate that the relative risks are in this order: 1. (least risky) receiving a bj w/o condom; 2. (more risky) giving a bj w/o condom; 3. (again more risky) topping w/o condom; and 4. (most risky) bottoming w/o condom.

 

For some reason, as you note, much of HIV prevention discourse presents the two anal “options” together, failing to acknowledge that they are in fact not of equal risk. My friend gets irritated at medical professionals for supplying a one-size-fits-all method of HIV prevention that he thinks has failed.

 

I would like to add that my intention here is not to endorse bareback topping, but to trouble the assumptions associated with oral bottoming (that it's always safe) and the grave danger of bareback bottoming.

[whipped guy]

RE: An Enlightening Discourse

 

Tom and Boston Guy! Thanks to both of you guys for a great exchange of ideas!

 

I am hopeful that for many out there your discourse has proven to be very edifying and enlightening...

 

Given the significance of this dialogue, perhaps you should start a new posting so all the "food for thought" posted above does not get lost in depths of this thread which unfortunately has taken a detour or two into the realm of scoffs, sarcastic comments, and inanity...

[Guest]

Your concern is heartening, but my schedule is full every single day, and my practice is full to the rim. One thing I've never seen you express is concern for is the health of the escorts you've been involved with (or anyone else, for that matter).

[twinkboylover28]

Right. I'm Richard Simmons.

 

Everyone can be superman on the net.

 

We can all be "doctors" with a "full practice" when we call people a "menace to the public health."

 

I also have a mansion in Palm Springs with twinks running all around.

 

God bless the internet.

[+ glutes]

What's that smell?? Bullshit. Your whole story from beginning to end is bullshit.

[twinkboylover28]

:-)

[Guest]

One of the skills a successful doctor needs is to tailor his communication style to each patient. One discusses things differently with a 40 year-old RN than with a 7 year-old boy. In your case, you act like a truant 12 year-old, so I adjust my communication accordingly.

[twinkboylover28]

I'll take that as a compliment.

[twinkboylover28]

I went to this "low-income/people who are uninsured" doctors office because i was having smptoms of prostatitis which i believed was caused from chlamidia/ngu which i contracted from my unprotected anal sex encounter.

 

Prior to this incident, I havent had unprotected anal sex since decemebr 4, 2005.

 

Obviously, if I'm having pain/discomfort between my rectum and testicles just 7 days AFTER i had unprotected anal sex (and i didnt have these symptoms before)..i think it's a safe bet to say that the unprotected anal sex of June 8, 2006 caused my smptoms of today.

 

The bottom line, this doctor refused to treat my pain/discomfort and kicked me out of her office because i refused to have that "needle stuck up my penis" to test for gono and chlamidia. I also refused a prostate exam.

 

I wanted her to treat me empiricaly based on my smptoms like all my previous doctors have.

 

 

There are other ways to test for std's..ie- blood, urine, symptoms.

 

I cant beleive a "doctor" would rather kick someone out of her office and let them suffer throughout the weekend and force them to search for a new doctor just because the patient refused to have that "needle test" and "finger up the butt" test.

 

I find it infurriating that i drove 2 hours (one hour each way) to her office and then waited nearly 2 hours to be seen...only to be told "this isnt working out, i cant be negotiating complex medical procedures with patients."

 

I didnt know doctors appointments had to "work out" ...as if i was on a date.

 

In the past, my urologist (who unfortunately is now retired) would just prescribe 8 weeks of Cipro (500 mg twice a day for 8 weeks) and give me the chlamidia shot and this would solve my smptoms of prostatitis.

 

It's not like i can abuse Cipro... as one might abuse cocaine, heroin, morphine!

 

 

Now I have another appointment with a regualr doctor this Monday; however, I was really planning on having the antibiotc yesterday because the sooner you treat smptoms, the better.

 

I'm never having unprotected anal intercouirse again.

 

I really hope I dont get HIV.

 

I'm having anxiety that this new doctor on Monday might refuse to give me the antibiotic.

[twinkboylover28]

>One of the skills a successful doctor needs is to tailor his

>communication style to each patient. One discusses things

>differently with a 40 year-old RN than with a 7 year-old boy.

>In your case, you act like a truant 12 year-old, so I adjust

>my communication accordingly.

 

 

God forbid anyone with HIV has to come in contact with your "doctors office".

 

They will be called a menace to society, and told they acted like a truant 12 year old because they got HIV.

 

Professional expert medical adivice at its best!

[Funseeker 22]

Attention Ho wants to bring this post back to the top.

I never believed the original post. :+ :+

[twinkboylover28]

>Attention Ho wants to bring this post back to the top.

>I never believed the original post. :+ :+

 

 

Riiiiiiight. I made the whole thing up just so I could get attacked online and bask in all the internet message board "attention."

 

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.

[Guest zipperzone]

>>Attention Ho wants to bring this post back to the top.

>>I never believed the original post. :+ :+

>

>

>Riiiiiiight. I made the whole thing up just so I could get

>attacked online and bask in all the internet message board

>"attention."

>

>HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.

 

Frankly my dear, you have become one very large pain in the ass, and one that no dose of Cipro how ever large, can cure.

 

And eight weeks of Cipro - give me a break. You don't even need that much for a dose of Anthrax .

[twinkboylover28]

Antibiotic treatment with Cipro for prostatitis ranges from 4-12 weeks.

[+ glutes]

The Troll is back amongst us, that is the smell.

DON'T FEED THE TROLL!